{"title":"桉树 virgata Sieb.","authors":"Anthony R Bean","doi":"10.7751/telopea18102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Eucalyptus virgata was validly published in 1827, but the name has not been in common usage for several decades. Its identity has been uncertain because the type lacks mature flower buds and fruits, and there was no description provided for bark or habit. The current availability of numerous images of the type has allowed a careful examination of salient characters, and E. virgata is thought to be conspecific with E. oreades R.T.Baker, or possibly E. dendromorpha (Blakely) L.A.S.Johnson & Blaxell. Morphological comparisons are made with other related species that have been attributed to E. virgata over the years.","PeriodicalId":510102,"journal":{"name":"Telopea","volume":" 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The identity of Eucalyptus virgata Sieb. ex Spreng.\",\"authors\":\"Anthony R Bean\",\"doi\":\"10.7751/telopea18102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Eucalyptus virgata was validly published in 1827, but the name has not been in common usage for several decades. Its identity has been uncertain because the type lacks mature flower buds and fruits, and there was no description provided for bark or habit. The current availability of numerous images of the type has allowed a careful examination of salient characters, and E. virgata is thought to be conspecific with E. oreades R.T.Baker, or possibly E. dendromorpha (Blakely) L.A.S.Johnson & Blaxell. Morphological comparisons are made with other related species that have been attributed to E. virgata over the years.\",\"PeriodicalId\":510102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telopea\",\"volume\":\" 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telopea\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7751/telopea18102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telopea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7751/telopea18102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
病毒桉（Eucalyptus virgata）于 1827 年正式发表，但几十年来该名称一直未被广泛使用。它的身份一直不确定，因为模式标本缺乏成熟的花芽和果实，也没有关于树皮或习性的描述。virgata 被认为与 E. oreades R.T.Baker 或 E. dendromorpha (Blakely) L.A.S.Johnson & Blaxell 为同种。virgata 的形态学比较。
The identity of Eucalyptus virgata Sieb. ex Spreng.
Eucalyptus virgata was validly published in 1827, but the name has not been in common usage for several decades. Its identity has been uncertain because the type lacks mature flower buds and fruits, and there was no description provided for bark or habit. The current availability of numerous images of the type has allowed a careful examination of salient characters, and E. virgata is thought to be conspecific with E. oreades R.T.Baker, or possibly E. dendromorpha (Blakely) L.A.S.Johnson & Blaxell. Morphological comparisons are made with other related species that have been attributed to E. virgata over the years.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
