现代日本哲学中的德国唯心主义自由观:考察

Q2 Medicine
Synergy Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI:10.24818/syn/2024/20/1.04
Dennis Prooi
{"title":"现代日本哲学中的德国唯心主义自由观:考察","authors":"Dennis Prooi","doi":"10.24818/syn/2024/20/1.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper surveys the transmission of the German idealist conception of freedom to Japan during the Meiji period and explores its significance to the subsequent development of the Kyoto School of Philosophy. My discussion focuses on, first, mapping the context in which Kiyozawa Manshi first adopted the German idealist conception of freedom; second, showing how Tosaka Jun criticized Nishida philosophy as a disguised form of German idealism; and third, considering Nishitani Keiji’s rejection of the conception of freedom found in Western existentialism in favor of a conception anchored in Nishida philosophy. I show how none of these three philosophers rejects liberalism in toto, but how they reject one form to adopt another.","PeriodicalId":38079,"journal":{"name":"Synergy","volume":"118 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE GERMAN IDEALIST CONCEPTION OF FREEDOM IN MODERN JAPANESE PHILOSOPHY: A SURVEY\",\"authors\":\"Dennis Prooi\",\"doi\":\"10.24818/syn/2024/20/1.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper surveys the transmission of the German idealist conception of freedom to Japan during the Meiji period and explores its significance to the subsequent development of the Kyoto School of Philosophy. My discussion focuses on, first, mapping the context in which Kiyozawa Manshi first adopted the German idealist conception of freedom; second, showing how Tosaka Jun criticized Nishida philosophy as a disguised form of German idealism; and third, considering Nishitani Keiji’s rejection of the conception of freedom found in Western existentialism in favor of a conception anchored in Nishida philosophy. I show how none of these three philosophers rejects liberalism in toto, but how they reject one form to adopt another.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Synergy\",\"volume\":\"118 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Synergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24818/syn/2024/20/1.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Synergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24818/syn/2024/20/1.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文概述了明治时期德国唯心主义自由观传入日本的情况,并探讨了其对京都哲学流派后来发展的意义。我的讨论主要集中在以下几个方面:第一,描绘清泽万世首次采用德国唯心主义自由观的背景;第二,展示户坂纯如何批评西田哲学是德国唯心主义的变相形式;第三,考虑西谷圭司拒绝接受西方存在主义中的自由观,转而采用西田哲学中的自由观。我将展示这三位哲学家是如何全盘否定自由主义的,以及他们是如何拒绝一种形式而采用另一种形式的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE GERMAN IDEALIST CONCEPTION OF FREEDOM IN MODERN JAPANESE PHILOSOPHY: A SURVEY
This paper surveys the transmission of the German idealist conception of freedom to Japan during the Meiji period and explores its significance to the subsequent development of the Kyoto School of Philosophy. My discussion focuses on, first, mapping the context in which Kiyozawa Manshi first adopted the German idealist conception of freedom; second, showing how Tosaka Jun criticized Nishida philosophy as a disguised form of German idealism; and third, considering Nishitani Keiji’s rejection of the conception of freedom found in Western existentialism in favor of a conception anchored in Nishida philosophy. I show how none of these three philosophers rejects liberalism in toto, but how they reject one form to adopt another.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Synergy
Synergy Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信