提高文献综述的影响力:做出有意义贡献的指导方针

Q1 Business, Management and Accounting
Allard C. R. van Riel, Hannah Snyder
{"title":"提高文献综述的影响力:做出有意义贡献的指导方针","authors":"Allard C. R. van Riel, Hannah Snyder","doi":"10.1108/sjme-05-2024-0125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nMost papers and books on conducting literature reviews primarily emphasize achieving technical quality, ensuring reproducibility and validating results. Notwithstanding the need for technical excellence, there is also a need for relevance. The purpose of this study is to address that need and offer practical and constructive suggestions for enhancing the meaningful contribution of a literature review, thereby increasing its impact and relevance for publication.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nIn this conceptual paper, the authors explore strategies to enhance the relevance and contribution of a literature review. By clarifying the needs of diverse audiences and the principles of generating new insights, the authors provide a broad range of options without being prescriptive. Recognizing that every literature review is unique, this paper contrasts various approaches to offer flexible and adaptable guidance.\n\n\nFindings\nLiterature reviews can be enjoyable to read and write, offering a wide range of substantial contributions that meet the expectations of readers and journal editors. This paper offers practical suggestions for prospective authors to make their reviews more relevant, invaluable and engaging, and summarizes these suggestions in a comprehensive checklist.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe paper is not exhaustive but rather complements prevalent literature review methodologies.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nExisting literature offers limited guidance on enhancing a review’s contribution to science, academic inquiry and society. This paper fills that gap by providing both academic considerations and practical recommendations, drawing on the author’s extensive experience in reviewing and conducting literature reviews.\n","PeriodicalId":37428,"journal":{"name":"Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC","volume":"123 43","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing the impact of literature reviews: guidelines for making meaningful contributions\",\"authors\":\"Allard C. R. van Riel, Hannah Snyder\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/sjme-05-2024-0125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nMost papers and books on conducting literature reviews primarily emphasize achieving technical quality, ensuring reproducibility and validating results. Notwithstanding the need for technical excellence, there is also a need for relevance. The purpose of this study is to address that need and offer practical and constructive suggestions for enhancing the meaningful contribution of a literature review, thereby increasing its impact and relevance for publication.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nIn this conceptual paper, the authors explore strategies to enhance the relevance and contribution of a literature review. By clarifying the needs of diverse audiences and the principles of generating new insights, the authors provide a broad range of options without being prescriptive. Recognizing that every literature review is unique, this paper contrasts various approaches to offer flexible and adaptable guidance.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nLiterature reviews can be enjoyable to read and write, offering a wide range of substantial contributions that meet the expectations of readers and journal editors. This paper offers practical suggestions for prospective authors to make their reviews more relevant, invaluable and engaging, and summarizes these suggestions in a comprehensive checklist.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThe paper is not exhaustive but rather complements prevalent literature review methodologies.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nExisting literature offers limited guidance on enhancing a review’s contribution to science, academic inquiry and society. This paper fills that gap by providing both academic considerations and practical recommendations, drawing on the author’s extensive experience in reviewing and conducting literature reviews.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":37428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC\",\"volume\":\"123 43\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/sjme-05-2024-0125\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sjme-05-2024-0125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 大多数关于进行文献综述的论文和书籍主要强调实现技术质量、确保可重复性和验证结果。尽管需要卓越的技术,但也需要相关性。本研究旨在满足这一需求,并为增强文献综述的有意义贡献提供实用的建设性建议,从而提高其影响力和出版相关性。设计/方法/途径在这篇概念性论文中,作者探讨了增强文献综述相关性和贡献的策略。通过阐明不同受众的需求和产生新见解的原则,作者提供了一系列广泛的选择,但并不具有指令性。由于认识到每篇文献综述都是独一无二的,本文对各种方法进行了对比,从而提供了灵活、可调整的指导。本文为未来的作者提供了切实可行的建议,使他们的评论更具相关性、价值和吸引力,并将这些建议总结为一份全面的清单。研究局限性/影响本文并非详尽无遗,而是对现有文献综述方法的补充。本文利用作者在审阅和进行文献综述方面的丰富经验,提供了学术考虑因素和实用建议,从而填补了这一空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing the impact of literature reviews: guidelines for making meaningful contributions
Purpose Most papers and books on conducting literature reviews primarily emphasize achieving technical quality, ensuring reproducibility and validating results. Notwithstanding the need for technical excellence, there is also a need for relevance. The purpose of this study is to address that need and offer practical and constructive suggestions for enhancing the meaningful contribution of a literature review, thereby increasing its impact and relevance for publication. Design/methodology/approach In this conceptual paper, the authors explore strategies to enhance the relevance and contribution of a literature review. By clarifying the needs of diverse audiences and the principles of generating new insights, the authors provide a broad range of options without being prescriptive. Recognizing that every literature review is unique, this paper contrasts various approaches to offer flexible and adaptable guidance. Findings Literature reviews can be enjoyable to read and write, offering a wide range of substantial contributions that meet the expectations of readers and journal editors. This paper offers practical suggestions for prospective authors to make their reviews more relevant, invaluable and engaging, and summarizes these suggestions in a comprehensive checklist. Research limitations/implications The paper is not exhaustive but rather complements prevalent literature review methodologies. Originality/value Existing literature offers limited guidance on enhancing a review’s contribution to science, academic inquiry and society. This paper fills that gap by providing both academic considerations and practical recommendations, drawing on the author’s extensive experience in reviewing and conducting literature reviews.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC
Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC Business, Management and Accounting-Marketing
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expected manuscript profile: SJM-ESIC is especially interested in submissions that include unique and novel contributions on the frontier of knowledge, focused on emerging areas relevant to academic research in marketing or even opening new research niches. New methodologies and techniques are particularly appreciated. SJM-ESIC welcomes a wide array of original contributions (quantitative or qualitative empirical analysis, critical literature reviews, meta-analysis, theoretical papers, agenda for future research, etc.), as well as research that cross the frontiers between marketing and other related areas. Submitted manuscripts can be focused on Spanish, Latin-American, but also any other relevant market. Agenda for Future Research: Considering the interest of the SJM-ESIC for unique and novel contributions on the frontier of knowledge, this section aims to create a space for critical reflection of new directions in which future specialized research in the marketing field should advance. The Agenda for Future Research section welcomes contributions outlining emerging opportunities in the marketing discipline derived, for example, from changes in consumers'' behaviour. New challenges in this evolving field might be also addressed. In sum, this section aims to propose new research avenues for marketing academics in order to inspire future research agendas. Leading researchers in the marketing discipline, either alone or in collaboration, are highly encouraged to contribute to this Agenda for Future Research section. Due to the particularities of this type of contributions, no restrictions on manuscript structure apply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信