利用模糊分析层次过程选择建筑材料

L. S. Reddy, N.R.D. Murthy, M. Srikanth, S. Sunil, Pratap Reddy, D. M. Keerthana
{"title":"利用模糊分析层次过程选择建筑材料","authors":"L. S. Reddy, N.R.D. Murthy, M. Srikanth, S. Sunil, Pratap Reddy, D. M. Keerthana","doi":"10.2174/0118741495311020240708045927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Building materials play a vital role in the construction industry as they are directly related to quality, cost, constructability, and location-specific availability of material and skill. Selection of building materials is critical when there are too many alternatives. Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) techniques are widely used to make such decisions simpler. For accurate decision-making, the selection of the appropriate MCDM method is very important. Most of the researchers used TOPSIS or AHP as MCDM techniques for decision-making in the construction industry.\n \n \n \n In the present study, the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (AHP) was used as an MCDM technique. The criteria and alternatives were identified for decision-making. The alternatives selected were locations specific to Hanamkonda, Telangana state, India. The criteria and alternatives were chosen for the building materials like cement, bricks, sand, doors, pipes, and tiles. The weights were calculated for each alternative fuzzy AHP geometric mean method. The weights of alternatives were evaluated and ranked.\n \n \n \n The best materials for cement, bricks, sand, doors, pipes, and tiles were Portland pozzolana, burnt clay bricks, river sand, UPVC, UPVC/CPVC, and marble, respectively.\n \n \n \n Thus, building materials can be selected using fuzzy AHP by the client for the successful execution of a project based on his/her preferences and the location of that project.\n","PeriodicalId":350575,"journal":{"name":"The Open Civil Engineering Journal","volume":"31 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selection of Building Materials Using Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process\",\"authors\":\"L. S. Reddy, N.R.D. Murthy, M. Srikanth, S. Sunil, Pratap Reddy, D. M. Keerthana\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0118741495311020240708045927\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Building materials play a vital role in the construction industry as they are directly related to quality, cost, constructability, and location-specific availability of material and skill. Selection of building materials is critical when there are too many alternatives. Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) techniques are widely used to make such decisions simpler. For accurate decision-making, the selection of the appropriate MCDM method is very important. Most of the researchers used TOPSIS or AHP as MCDM techniques for decision-making in the construction industry.\\n \\n \\n \\n In the present study, the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (AHP) was used as an MCDM technique. The criteria and alternatives were identified for decision-making. The alternatives selected were locations specific to Hanamkonda, Telangana state, India. The criteria and alternatives were chosen for the building materials like cement, bricks, sand, doors, pipes, and tiles. The weights were calculated for each alternative fuzzy AHP geometric mean method. The weights of alternatives were evaluated and ranked.\\n \\n \\n \\n The best materials for cement, bricks, sand, doors, pipes, and tiles were Portland pozzolana, burnt clay bricks, river sand, UPVC, UPVC/CPVC, and marble, respectively.\\n \\n \\n \\n Thus, building materials can be selected using fuzzy AHP by the client for the successful execution of a project based on his/her preferences and the location of that project.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":350575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Open Civil Engineering Journal\",\"volume\":\"31 13\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Open Civil Engineering Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0118741495311020240708045927\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Civil Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0118741495311020240708045927","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

建筑材料在建筑业中发挥着至关重要的作用,因为它们直接关系到质量、成本、可施工性以及特定地点的材料和技术供应。当备选方案过多时,建筑材料的选择至关重要。多标准决策(MCDM)技术被广泛用于简化此类决策。为了准确决策,选择适当的 MCDM 方法非常重要。大多数研究人员使用 TOPSIS 或 AHP 作为建筑行业决策的 MCDM 技术。 在本研究中,模糊分析层次过程(AHP)被用作一种 MCDM 技术。为决策确定了标准和备选方案。选择的替代方案是印度特兰甘纳邦哈纳姆孔达的特定地点。选择的标准和替代品包括水泥、砖、沙、门、管道和瓷砖等建筑材料。每个备选方案的权重都是通过模糊 AHP 几何平均法计算得出的。对备选方案的权重进行了评估和排序。 水泥、砖、沙、门、管道和瓷砖的最佳材料分别是波特兰水泥、烧粘土砖、河沙、UPVC、UPVC/CPVC 和大理石。 因此,客户可以根据自己的喜好和项目地点,使用模糊 AHP 来选择建筑材料,以便成功实施项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Selection of Building Materials Using Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process
Building materials play a vital role in the construction industry as they are directly related to quality, cost, constructability, and location-specific availability of material and skill. Selection of building materials is critical when there are too many alternatives. Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) techniques are widely used to make such decisions simpler. For accurate decision-making, the selection of the appropriate MCDM method is very important. Most of the researchers used TOPSIS or AHP as MCDM techniques for decision-making in the construction industry. In the present study, the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (AHP) was used as an MCDM technique. The criteria and alternatives were identified for decision-making. The alternatives selected were locations specific to Hanamkonda, Telangana state, India. The criteria and alternatives were chosen for the building materials like cement, bricks, sand, doors, pipes, and tiles. The weights were calculated for each alternative fuzzy AHP geometric mean method. The weights of alternatives were evaluated and ranked. The best materials for cement, bricks, sand, doors, pipes, and tiles were Portland pozzolana, burnt clay bricks, river sand, UPVC, UPVC/CPVC, and marble, respectively. Thus, building materials can be selected using fuzzy AHP by the client for the successful execution of a project based on his/her preferences and the location of that project.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信