军事人员的决策风格、个性和决策结果,一种网络分析方法。

Q4 Psychology
Constantin Roanghesi
{"title":"军事人员的决策风格、个性和决策结果,一种网络分析方法。","authors":"Constantin Roanghesi","doi":"10.24837/pru.v22i1.557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The role of personality factors and decision-making styles is analyzed in the decision-making process, using the Decision Outcomes Inventory (DOI), developed by Bruine de Bruine et al. in a sample of the population of 178 active militaries, of which 135 men and 39 women. The results of the decision-making process are significantly predicted by the anxious decision-making style, i.e., people who tend to experience negative feelings during decision-making end up having better results when making decisions. The strong link between the anxious decision-making style and emotional stability is highlighted by the structure of the network used in the analysis.  Since the opposite pole of emotional stability is neuroticism, we can say that people with an anxious decision-making style face a wide range of feelings specific to this decision-making style, such as fear, and insecurity, so they postpone deciding until they find the best solution.","PeriodicalId":37470,"journal":{"name":"Psihologia Resurselor Umane","volume":"85 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decision-making style, personality, and decision outcomes of military personnel, a network analysis approach.\",\"authors\":\"Constantin Roanghesi\",\"doi\":\"10.24837/pru.v22i1.557\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The role of personality factors and decision-making styles is analyzed in the decision-making process, using the Decision Outcomes Inventory (DOI), developed by Bruine de Bruine et al. in a sample of the population of 178 active militaries, of which 135 men and 39 women. The results of the decision-making process are significantly predicted by the anxious decision-making style, i.e., people who tend to experience negative feelings during decision-making end up having better results when making decisions. The strong link between the anxious decision-making style and emotional stability is highlighted by the structure of the network used in the analysis.  Since the opposite pole of emotional stability is neuroticism, we can say that people with an anxious decision-making style face a wide range of feelings specific to this decision-making style, such as fear, and insecurity, so they postpone deciding until they find the best solution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37470,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psihologia Resurselor Umane\",\"volume\":\"85 19\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psihologia Resurselor Umane\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24837/pru.v22i1.557\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psihologia Resurselor Umane","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24837/pru.v22i1.557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究使用 Bruine de Bruine 等人开发的决策结果量表 (DOI),以 178 名现役军人(其中 135 名男性和 39 名女性)为样本,分析了人格因素和决策风格在决策过程中的作用。决策过程的结果在很大程度上受焦虑决策风格的影响,即在决策过程中倾向于体验负面情绪的人最终会在决策时获得更好的结果。焦虑决策风格与情绪稳定性之间的紧密联系从分析中使用的网络结构中凸显出来。 由于情绪稳定性的对立面是神经质,我们可以说,焦虑型决策风格的人面临着这种决策风格所特有的各种感受,如恐惧和不安全感,因此他们会推迟决策,直到找到最佳解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Decision-making style, personality, and decision outcomes of military personnel, a network analysis approach.
The role of personality factors and decision-making styles is analyzed in the decision-making process, using the Decision Outcomes Inventory (DOI), developed by Bruine de Bruine et al. in a sample of the population of 178 active militaries, of which 135 men and 39 women. The results of the decision-making process are significantly predicted by the anxious decision-making style, i.e., people who tend to experience negative feelings during decision-making end up having better results when making decisions. The strong link between the anxious decision-making style and emotional stability is highlighted by the structure of the network used in the analysis.  Since the opposite pole of emotional stability is neuroticism, we can say that people with an anxious decision-making style face a wide range of feelings specific to this decision-making style, such as fear, and insecurity, so they postpone deciding until they find the best solution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psihologia Resurselor Umane
Psihologia Resurselor Umane Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: The Psihologia Resurselor Umane Journal is the official journal of the Association of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (APIO). PRU is devoted to publishing original investigations that contribute to an understanding of situational and individual challenges within an organizational context and that bring forth new knowledge in the field. The journal publishes primarily empirical articles and also welcomes methodological and theoretical articles on a broad range of topics covered by Organizational, Industrial, Work, Personnel and Occupational Health Psychology. Audience includes scholars, educators, managers, HR professionals, organizational consultants, practitioners in organizational and employee development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信