疾病诊断中的层次分析法

S. A. Tarasova, V. V. Tarasov
{"title":"疾病诊断中的层次分析法","authors":"S. A. Tarasova, V. V. Tarasov","doi":"10.17587/it.30.367-371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study proposes an approach to diagnostics of diseases based on the analytic hierarchy process, which is as follows: by the method of pairwise comparisons, the weight structures of the symptoms of the alleged disease and the patient's disease are investigated, then the measure of the differences between these structures is evaluated, based on this assessment, we can talk about the reliability of the patient's diagnosis. Unlike the classical analytic hierarchy process, there are no alternatives in the developed modification, and diagnostics is carried out only by comparing the weight structures of the symptoms of the alleged disease and the patient's disease, that is, the approach does not imply the establishment of one of the alternative diagnoses, but only confirms (or refutes) the presence of the patient's disease. The method is tested on the basis of a clinical case of a mental disorder, the index of structural differences showed the identity of the weight structures of the symptoms of the alleged disease and the patient's disease, which confirmed the reliability of the patient's diagnosis. The method can be used to assess the reliability of the diagnosis, and, if repeated, the clinical dynamics of the disease in the course of therapy.","PeriodicalId":504905,"journal":{"name":"Informacionnye Tehnologii","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analytic Hierarchy Process in Diagnostics of Diseases\",\"authors\":\"S. A. Tarasova, V. V. Tarasov\",\"doi\":\"10.17587/it.30.367-371\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study proposes an approach to diagnostics of diseases based on the analytic hierarchy process, which is as follows: by the method of pairwise comparisons, the weight structures of the symptoms of the alleged disease and the patient's disease are investigated, then the measure of the differences between these structures is evaluated, based on this assessment, we can talk about the reliability of the patient's diagnosis. Unlike the classical analytic hierarchy process, there are no alternatives in the developed modification, and diagnostics is carried out only by comparing the weight structures of the symptoms of the alleged disease and the patient's disease, that is, the approach does not imply the establishment of one of the alternative diagnoses, but only confirms (or refutes) the presence of the patient's disease. The method is tested on the basis of a clinical case of a mental disorder, the index of structural differences showed the identity of the weight structures of the symptoms of the alleged disease and the patient's disease, which confirmed the reliability of the patient's diagnosis. The method can be used to assess the reliability of the diagnosis, and, if repeated, the clinical dynamics of the disease in the course of therapy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":504905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Informacionnye Tehnologii\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Informacionnye Tehnologii\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17587/it.30.367-371\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informacionnye Tehnologii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17587/it.30.367-371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该研究提出了一种基于分析层次过程的疾病诊断方法,具体如下:通过成对比较的方法,对所称疾病症状和患者疾病的权重结构进行调查,然后评估这些结构之间差异的度量,在此评估的基础上,我们可以谈论患者诊断的可靠性。与经典的层次分析法不同的是,所开发的改良方法中没有替代方案,仅通过比较指称疾病症状和患者疾病症状的权重结构来进行诊断,也就是说,该方法并不意味着确定其中一个替代诊断,而只是确认(或反驳)患者疾病的存在。该方法在一个精神障碍临床病例的基础上进行了测试,结构差异指数显示所称疾病症状的重量结构与患者疾病的重量结构一致,这证实了患者诊断的可靠性。该方法可用于评估诊断的可靠性,如果重复使用,还可用于评估治疗过程中疾病的临床动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analytic Hierarchy Process in Diagnostics of Diseases
The study proposes an approach to diagnostics of diseases based on the analytic hierarchy process, which is as follows: by the method of pairwise comparisons, the weight structures of the symptoms of the alleged disease and the patient's disease are investigated, then the measure of the differences between these structures is evaluated, based on this assessment, we can talk about the reliability of the patient's diagnosis. Unlike the classical analytic hierarchy process, there are no alternatives in the developed modification, and diagnostics is carried out only by comparing the weight structures of the symptoms of the alleged disease and the patient's disease, that is, the approach does not imply the establishment of one of the alternative diagnoses, but only confirms (or refutes) the presence of the patient's disease. The method is tested on the basis of a clinical case of a mental disorder, the index of structural differences showed the identity of the weight structures of the symptoms of the alleged disease and the patient's disease, which confirmed the reliability of the patient's diagnosis. The method can be used to assess the reliability of the diagnosis, and, if repeated, the clinical dynamics of the disease in the course of therapy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信