YouTube™ 上有关磨牙症视频的可靠性和质量

Larissa Soares-Silva, Marina Antonino Nunes de Souza, Ivete Pomarico Ribeiro de Souza, Marcelo de Castro Costa, C. Tavares-Silva, Matheus Melo Pithon, Luciane Cople Maia
{"title":"YouTube™ 上有关磨牙症视频的可靠性和质量","authors":"Larissa Soares-Silva, Marina Antonino Nunes de Souza, Ivete Pomarico Ribeiro de Souza, Marcelo de Castro Costa, C. Tavares-Silva, Matheus Melo Pithon, Luciane Cople Maia","doi":"10.59681/2175-4411.v16.2024.1053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate the reliability and quality of YouTube™ videos about bruxism. Methods: Google Trends was used to determine the widely used search term on YouTube™. A playlist was created(N=100) and the number of views(NV), like/dislike(G/NG), presenter, treatments, interaction rate(TI) and views(VZ), the quality criteria for consumer health information(DISCERN) and the global quality scale index(GQS) were used. Spearman's correlation coefficient was calculated. Results: 88 videos with NV 30572.72 and G/NG 1153.76/18.31; 68(77.3%) presenters were dentists. The most cited treatment was muscle-relaxing plates; TI was 6.4 and VZ was 3658.5. Reliability was 2.82(±0.852); 21 (23.9%) were of good/excellent quality. A weak correlation between reliability/NV(rs=-0.254), the GQS/likes(rs=0.270) and the GQS/dislikes(rs=0.292). Conclusion: Content about bruxism on YouTube™ is diverse. Most of the content is presented by dentists. The information provided is moderately reliable.","PeriodicalId":91119,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health informatics","volume":"72 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability and quality of videos available on YouTube™ on bruxism\",\"authors\":\"Larissa Soares-Silva, Marina Antonino Nunes de Souza, Ivete Pomarico Ribeiro de Souza, Marcelo de Castro Costa, C. Tavares-Silva, Matheus Melo Pithon, Luciane Cople Maia\",\"doi\":\"10.59681/2175-4411.v16.2024.1053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To evaluate the reliability and quality of YouTube™ videos about bruxism. Methods: Google Trends was used to determine the widely used search term on YouTube™. A playlist was created(N=100) and the number of views(NV), like/dislike(G/NG), presenter, treatments, interaction rate(TI) and views(VZ), the quality criteria for consumer health information(DISCERN) and the global quality scale index(GQS) were used. Spearman's correlation coefficient was calculated. Results: 88 videos with NV 30572.72 and G/NG 1153.76/18.31; 68(77.3%) presenters were dentists. The most cited treatment was muscle-relaxing plates; TI was 6.4 and VZ was 3658.5. Reliability was 2.82(±0.852); 21 (23.9%) were of good/excellent quality. A weak correlation between reliability/NV(rs=-0.254), the GQS/likes(rs=0.270) and the GQS/dislikes(rs=0.292). Conclusion: Content about bruxism on YouTube™ is diverse. Most of the content is presented by dentists. The information provided is moderately reliable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of health informatics\",\"volume\":\"72 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of health informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59681/2175-4411.v16.2024.1053\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of health informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59681/2175-4411.v16.2024.1053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估有关磨牙症的 YouTube™ 视频的可靠性和质量。方法利用谷歌趋势确定 YouTube™ 上广泛使用的搜索词。创建了一个播放列表(N=100),并使用了观看次数(NV)、喜欢/不喜欢(G/NG)、主持人、治疗方法、互动率(TI)和观看次数(VZ)、消费者健康信息质量标准(DISCERN)和全球质量量表指数(GQS)。计算了斯皮尔曼相关系数。结果88段视频,NV值为30572.72,G/NG值为1153.76/18.31;68位(77.3%)主讲人为牙科医生。引用最多的治疗方法是肌肉放松板;TI 为 6.4,VZ 为 3658.5。可靠性为 2.82(±0.852);21(23.9%)份报告的质量为良好/优秀。可靠性/NV(rs=-0.254)、GQS/喜欢(rs=0.270)和 GQS/不喜欢(rs=0.292)之间存在微弱的相关性。结论YouTube™ 上有关磨牙症的内容多种多样。大部分内容由牙医提供。所提供的信息具有一定的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reliability and quality of videos available on YouTube™ on bruxism
Objective: To evaluate the reliability and quality of YouTube™ videos about bruxism. Methods: Google Trends was used to determine the widely used search term on YouTube™. A playlist was created(N=100) and the number of views(NV), like/dislike(G/NG), presenter, treatments, interaction rate(TI) and views(VZ), the quality criteria for consumer health information(DISCERN) and the global quality scale index(GQS) were used. Spearman's correlation coefficient was calculated. Results: 88 videos with NV 30572.72 and G/NG 1153.76/18.31; 68(77.3%) presenters were dentists. The most cited treatment was muscle-relaxing plates; TI was 6.4 and VZ was 3658.5. Reliability was 2.82(±0.852); 21 (23.9%) were of good/excellent quality. A weak correlation between reliability/NV(rs=-0.254), the GQS/likes(rs=0.270) and the GQS/dislikes(rs=0.292). Conclusion: Content about bruxism on YouTube™ is diverse. Most of the content is presented by dentists. The information provided is moderately reliable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信