Louise Mary Fuller, Helen M. Whitford, Rebecca Robinson, Yvie Cristiano, Ranjana Steward, Megan Poulsen, Eldho Paul, Greg Snell
{"title":"肺移植术后第一年的衰弱情况如何？","authors":"Louise Mary Fuller, Helen M. Whitford, Rebecca Robinson, Yvie Cristiano, Ranjana Steward, Megan Poulsen, Eldho Paul, Greg Snell","doi":"10.1111/ctr.15393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Frailty is prevalent in lung transplant (LTx) candidates, but the impact and subsequent frailty trajectory is unclear. This study aimed to investigate frailty over the first year after LTx.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Post-LTx recipients completed a thrice weekly 12-week directly supervised exercise rehabilitation program. Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS) was used to assess frailty. Primary outcome was 6-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD) measured at pre-LTx, prerehabilitation, postrehabilitation, and 1 year post-LTx.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>106 of 139 recruited participants underwent LTx: mean age 58 years, 48% male, 52% with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Mean (± SD) frailty scores pre-LTx and 1 year post-LTx were 5.54 ± 2.4 and 3.28 ±1.5. Mean 6MWD improved significantly for all: prerehabilitation 326 m (SD 116), versus postrehabilitation 523 m (SD 101) (<i>p</i> < 0.001) versus 1 year 512 m (SD 120) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). There were significant differences between an EFS > 7 (frail) and EFS ≤ 7 (not frail) for 6MWD, grip strength (GS), anxiety, and depression. Postrehabilitation, there were no significant differences in 6MWD, GS, anxiety, or depression while comparing EFS > 7 versus ≤ 7. At 1 year, there was a significant difference in depression but not 6MWD, GS, or anxiety between those EFS ≤ 7 and > 7 (<i>p</i> = 0.017).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Participants in a structured post-LTx rehabilitation program improved in functional exercise capacity (6MWD), GS, depression, and anxiety. For frail participants exercise capacity, depression, anxiety, and GS were well managed in rehabilitation with no significant differences between those who were not frail. Pre-LTx frailty may be reversible post-LTx and should not be an absolute contraindication to LTx.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Happens to Frailty in the First Year After Lung Transplantation?\",\"authors\":\"Louise Mary Fuller, Helen M. Whitford, Rebecca Robinson, Yvie Cristiano, Ranjana Steward, Megan Poulsen, Eldho Paul, Greg Snell\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ctr.15393\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Frailty is prevalent in lung transplant (LTx) candidates, but the impact and subsequent frailty trajectory is unclear. This study aimed to investigate frailty over the first year after LTx.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>Post-LTx recipients completed a thrice weekly 12-week directly supervised exercise rehabilitation program. Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS) was used to assess frailty. Primary outcome was 6-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD) measured at pre-LTx, prerehabilitation, postrehabilitation, and 1 year post-LTx.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>106 of 139 recruited participants underwent LTx: mean age 58 years, 48% male, 52% with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Mean (± SD) frailty scores pre-LTx and 1 year post-LTx were 5.54 ± 2.4 and 3.28 ±1.5. Mean 6MWD improved significantly for all: prerehabilitation 326 m (SD 116), versus postrehabilitation 523 m (SD 101) (<i>p</i> < 0.001) versus 1 year 512 m (SD 120) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). There were significant differences between an EFS > 7 (frail) and EFS ≤ 7 (not frail) for 6MWD, grip strength (GS), anxiety, and depression. Postrehabilitation, there were no significant differences in 6MWD, GS, anxiety, or depression while comparing EFS > 7 versus ≤ 7. At 1 year, there was a significant difference in depression but not 6MWD, GS, or anxiety between those EFS ≤ 7 and > 7 (<i>p</i> = 0.017).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Participants in a structured post-LTx rehabilitation program improved in functional exercise capacity (6MWD), GS, depression, and anxiety. For frail participants exercise capacity, depression, anxiety, and GS were well managed in rehabilitation with no significant differences between those who were not frail. Pre-LTx frailty may be reversible post-LTx and should not be an absolute contraindication to LTx.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Transplantation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.15393\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.15393","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
What Happens to Frailty in the First Year After Lung Transplantation?
Background
Frailty is prevalent in lung transplant (LTx) candidates, but the impact and subsequent frailty trajectory is unclear. This study aimed to investigate frailty over the first year after LTx.
Method
Post-LTx recipients completed a thrice weekly 12-week directly supervised exercise rehabilitation program. Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS) was used to assess frailty. Primary outcome was 6-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD) measured at pre-LTx, prerehabilitation, postrehabilitation, and 1 year post-LTx.
Results
106 of 139 recruited participants underwent LTx: mean age 58 years, 48% male, 52% with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Mean (± SD) frailty scores pre-LTx and 1 year post-LTx were 5.54 ± 2.4 and 3.28 ±1.5. Mean 6MWD improved significantly for all: prerehabilitation 326 m (SD 116), versus postrehabilitation 523 m (SD 101) (p < 0.001) versus 1 year 512 m (SD 120) (p < 0.001). There were significant differences between an EFS > 7 (frail) and EFS ≤ 7 (not frail) for 6MWD, grip strength (GS), anxiety, and depression. Postrehabilitation, there were no significant differences in 6MWD, GS, anxiety, or depression while comparing EFS > 7 versus ≤ 7. At 1 year, there was a significant difference in depression but not 6MWD, GS, or anxiety between those EFS ≤ 7 and > 7 (p = 0.017).
Conclusion
Participants in a structured post-LTx rehabilitation program improved in functional exercise capacity (6MWD), GS, depression, and anxiety. For frail participants exercise capacity, depression, anxiety, and GS were well managed in rehabilitation with no significant differences between those who were not frail. Pre-LTx frailty may be reversible post-LTx and should not be an absolute contraindication to LTx.
期刊介绍：
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored.
Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include:
Immunology and immunosuppression;
Patient preparation;
Social, ethical, and psychological issues;
Complications, short- and long-term results;
Artificial organs;
Donation and preservation of organ and tissue;
Translational studies;
Advances in tissue typing;
Updates on transplant pathology;.
Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries.
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
