回顾科学保护 50 年:知识生产偏差与实践经验。

IF 5.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Ambio Pub Date : 2024-07-18 DOI:10.1007/s13280-024-02049-w
Neil M. Dawson, Brendan Coolsaet, Aditi Bhardwaj, David Brown, Bosco Lliso, Jacqueline Loos, Laura Mannocci, Adrian Martin, Malena Oliva, Unai Pascual, Pasang Sherpa, Thomas Worsdell
{"title":"回顾科学保护 50 年:知识生产偏差与实践经验。","authors":"Neil M. Dawson,&nbsp;Brendan Coolsaet,&nbsp;Aditi Bhardwaj,&nbsp;David Brown,&nbsp;Bosco Lliso,&nbsp;Jacqueline Loos,&nbsp;Laura Mannocci,&nbsp;Adrian Martin,&nbsp;Malena Oliva,&nbsp;Unai Pascual,&nbsp;Pasang Sherpa,&nbsp;Thomas Worsdell","doi":"10.1007/s13280-024-02049-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Drawing on 662 studies from 102 countries, we present a systematic review of published empirical studies about site-level biodiversity conservation initiated between 1970 and 2019. Within this sample, we find that knowledge production about the Global South is largely produced by researchers in the Global North, implying a neocolonial power dynamic. We also find evidence of bias in reported ecological outcomes linked to lack of independence in scientific studies, serving to uphold narratives about who should lead conservation. We explore relationships in the sample studies between conservation initiative types, the extent of Indigenous Peoples’ and local communities’ influence in governance, and reported social and ecological outcomes. Findings reveal positive ecological and social outcomes are strongly associated with higher levels of influence of Indigenous Peoples and local communities and their institutions, implying equity in conservation practice should be advanced not only for moral reasons, but because it can enhance conservation effectiveness.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":461,"journal":{"name":"Ambio","volume":"53 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11383897/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reviewing the science on 50 years of conservation: Knowledge production biases and lessons for practice\",\"authors\":\"Neil M. Dawson,&nbsp;Brendan Coolsaet,&nbsp;Aditi Bhardwaj,&nbsp;David Brown,&nbsp;Bosco Lliso,&nbsp;Jacqueline Loos,&nbsp;Laura Mannocci,&nbsp;Adrian Martin,&nbsp;Malena Oliva,&nbsp;Unai Pascual,&nbsp;Pasang Sherpa,&nbsp;Thomas Worsdell\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13280-024-02049-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Drawing on 662 studies from 102 countries, we present a systematic review of published empirical studies about site-level biodiversity conservation initiated between 1970 and 2019. Within this sample, we find that knowledge production about the Global South is largely produced by researchers in the Global North, implying a neocolonial power dynamic. We also find evidence of bias in reported ecological outcomes linked to lack of independence in scientific studies, serving to uphold narratives about who should lead conservation. We explore relationships in the sample studies between conservation initiative types, the extent of Indigenous Peoples’ and local communities’ influence in governance, and reported social and ecological outcomes. Findings reveal positive ecological and social outcomes are strongly associated with higher levels of influence of Indigenous Peoples and local communities and their institutions, implying equity in conservation practice should be advanced not only for moral reasons, but because it can enhance conservation effectiveness.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ambio\",\"volume\":\"53 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11383897/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ambio\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13280-024-02049-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ambio","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13280-024-02049-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们利用来自 102 个国家的 662 项研究,对 1970 年至 2019 年间发表的有关遗址级生物多样性保护的实证研究进行了系统回顾。在这一样本中,我们发现有关全球南部的知识主要由全球北部的研究人员创造,这意味着一种新殖民主义的权力动态。我们还发现,有证据表明,报告的生态结果存在偏差,这与科学研究缺乏独立性有关,有助于维护关于谁应该领导保护工作的说法。我们在样本研究中探讨了保护措施类型、原住民和当地社区在治理中的影响程度以及报告的社会和生态成果之间的关系。研究结果表明,积极的生态和社会成果与原住民和当地社区及其机构的较高影响力密切相关,这意味着在保护实践中应促进公平,这不仅是出于道德原因,还因为它可以提高保护效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reviewing the science on 50 years of conservation: Knowledge production biases and lessons for practice

Drawing on 662 studies from 102 countries, we present a systematic review of published empirical studies about site-level biodiversity conservation initiated between 1970 and 2019. Within this sample, we find that knowledge production about the Global South is largely produced by researchers in the Global North, implying a neocolonial power dynamic. We also find evidence of bias in reported ecological outcomes linked to lack of independence in scientific studies, serving to uphold narratives about who should lead conservation. We explore relationships in the sample studies between conservation initiative types, the extent of Indigenous Peoples’ and local communities’ influence in governance, and reported social and ecological outcomes. Findings reveal positive ecological and social outcomes are strongly associated with higher levels of influence of Indigenous Peoples and local communities and their institutions, implying equity in conservation practice should be advanced not only for moral reasons, but because it can enhance conservation effectiveness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ambio
Ambio 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
14.30
自引率
3.10%
发文量
123
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Explores the link between anthropogenic activities and the environment, Ambio encourages multi- or interdisciplinary submissions with explicit management or policy recommendations. Ambio addresses the scientific, social, economic, and cultural factors that influence the condition of the human environment. Ambio particularly encourages multi- or inter-disciplinary submissions with explicit management or policy recommendations. For more than 45 years Ambio has brought international perspective to important developments in environmental research, policy and related activities for an international readership of specialists, generalists, students, decision-makers and interested laymen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信