对高等教育在线讨论工具进行混合方法评估

IF 1.3 4区经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS

International Review of Economics Education Pub Date : 2024-07-14 DOI:10.1016/j.iree.2024.100298

{"title":"对高等教育在线讨论工具进行混合方法评估","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.iree.2024.100298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We present a mixed methods comparative assessment of three online discussion tools widely used in higher education. We combine different data types (quantitative, qualitative) and sources (usage data, survey responses) to assess Piazza, Padlet, and Blackboard discussion boards. We highlight and discuss the differences between, and relative merits of, the tools and report the preferences of students on a large introductory Economics unit for them. We summarise lessons learnt from using the tools and make recommendations to engender greater student engagement with online discussion spaces.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45496,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Economics Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477388024000161/pdfft?md5=fa53615608b6dabbe802c17203cb738d&pid=1-s2.0-S1477388024000161-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A mixed methods evaluation of online discussion tools in higher education\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.iree.2024.100298\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We present a mixed methods comparative assessment of three online discussion tools widely used in higher education. We combine different data types (quantitative, qualitative) and sources (usage data, survey responses) to assess Piazza, Padlet, and Blackboard discussion boards. We highlight and discuss the differences between, and relative merits of, the tools and report the preferences of students on a large introductory Economics unit for them. We summarise lessons learnt from using the tools and make recommendations to engender greater student engagement with online discussion spaces.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review of Economics Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477388024000161/pdfft?md5=fa53615608b6dabbe802c17203cb738d&pid=1-s2.0-S1477388024000161-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review of Economics Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477388024000161\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Economics Education","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477388024000161","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

我们采用混合方法对高等教育中广泛使用的三种在线讨论工具进行了比较评估。我们结合了不同的数据类型（定量、定性）和来源（使用数据、调查反馈），对 Piazza、Padlet 和 Blackboard 讨论板进行了评估。我们强调并讨论了这些工具之间的差异和相对优点，并报告了学生在一个大型经济学入门单元中对这些工具的偏好。我们总结了使用这些工具的经验教训，并就如何提高学生对在线讨论空间的参与度提出了建议。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

A mixed methods evaluation of online discussion tools in higher education

We present a mixed methods comparative assessment of three online discussion tools widely used in higher education. We combine different data types (quantitative, qualitative) and sources (usage data, survey responses) to assess Piazza, Padlet, and Blackboard discussion boards. We highlight and discuss the differences between, and relative merits of, the tools and report the preferences of students on a large introductory Economics unit for them. We summarise lessons learnt from using the tools and make recommendations to engender greater student engagement with online discussion spaces.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

International Review of Economics Education Multiple-

CiteScore

4.40

自引率

4.80%

发文量

审稿时长

28 days