Sarah C Van Alsten, Sanah N Vohra, Joannie M Ivory, Alina M Hamilton, Xiaohua Gao, Erin L Kirk, Eboneé N Butler, H Shelton Earp, Katherine E Reeder-Hayes, Katherine A Hoadley, Lisa A Carey, Melissa A Troester
{"title":"年轻女性和黑人乳腺癌患者的 21 基因和 PAM50 复发评分差异。","authors":"Sarah C Van Alsten, Sanah N Vohra, Joannie M Ivory, Alina M Hamilton, Xiaohua Gao, Erin L Kirk, Eboneé N Butler, H Shelton Earp, Katherine E Reeder-Hayes, Katherine A Hoadley, Lisa A Carey, Melissa A Troester","doi":"10.1200/PO.24.00137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Genomic tests, such as the Oncotype Dx 21-gene and Prosigna risk of recurrence (ROR-P) assay, are commonly used for breast cancer prognostication. Emerging data suggest variability between assays, but this has not been compared in diverse populations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>RNA sequencing was performed on 647 previously untreated stage I-III estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative tumors in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study, which oversampled Black and younger women (age <50 years at diagnosis), using research versions of two common RNA-based prognostic assays: ROR-P<sub>R</sub> and the 21-gene recurrence score (RS<sub>R</sub>). Relative frequency differences and 95% CIs were estimated for associations with race and age, and hazards of 5-year local or distant recurrence were modeled with Cox regression. Proliferation and estrogen module scores from each assay, representing broad activity of genes in those pathways, were examined to guide interpretation of differences between tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among both younger and older individuals, Black women had higher frequency of intermediate and high ROR-P<sub>R</sub> scores than non-Black women. Race was not significantly associated with RS<sub>R</sub> in either age group. High (hazard ratio [HR], 4.67 [95% CI, 1.73 to 12.70]) and intermediate (HR, 2.12 [95% CI, 0.98 to 4.62]) ROR-P<sub>R</sub> scores were associated with greater risk of recurrence, but RS<sub>R</sub> did not predict recurrence. RS<sub>R</sub> emphasized estrogen over proliferation modules, whereas ROR-P<sub>R</sub> emphasized proliferation. Higher proliferation scores were associated with younger age and Black race in both assays. Modifications to the RS<sub>R</sub> algorithm that increased emphasis on proliferation improved prognostication in this diverse population.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ROR-P<sub>R</sub> and the 21-gene RS<sub>R</sub> differentially emphasize estrogen-related and proliferative biology. The emphasis of 21-gene RS on estrogen-related biology and lower endocrine therapy initiation among Black women may contribute to poorer prognostic ability in heterogeneously treated populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":14797,"journal":{"name":"JCO precision oncology","volume":"8 ","pages":"e2400137"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11555617/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in 21-Gene and PAM50 Recurrence Scores in Younger and Black Women With Breast Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah C Van Alsten, Sanah N Vohra, Joannie M Ivory, Alina M Hamilton, Xiaohua Gao, Erin L Kirk, Eboneé N Butler, H Shelton Earp, Katherine E Reeder-Hayes, Katherine A Hoadley, Lisa A Carey, Melissa A Troester\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/PO.24.00137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Genomic tests, such as the Oncotype Dx 21-gene and Prosigna risk of recurrence (ROR-P) assay, are commonly used for breast cancer prognostication. Emerging data suggest variability between assays, but this has not been compared in diverse populations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>RNA sequencing was performed on 647 previously untreated stage I-III estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative tumors in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study, which oversampled Black and younger women (age <50 years at diagnosis), using research versions of two common RNA-based prognostic assays: ROR-P<sub>R</sub> and the 21-gene recurrence score (RS<sub>R</sub>). Relative frequency differences and 95% CIs were estimated for associations with race and age, and hazards of 5-year local or distant recurrence were modeled with Cox regression. Proliferation and estrogen module scores from each assay, representing broad activity of genes in those pathways, were examined to guide interpretation of differences between tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among both younger and older individuals, Black women had higher frequency of intermediate and high ROR-P<sub>R</sub> scores than non-Black women. Race was not significantly associated with RS<sub>R</sub> in either age group. High (hazard ratio [HR], 4.67 [95% CI, 1.73 to 12.70]) and intermediate (HR, 2.12 [95% CI, 0.98 to 4.62]) ROR-P<sub>R</sub> scores were associated with greater risk of recurrence, but RS<sub>R</sub> did not predict recurrence. RS<sub>R</sub> emphasized estrogen over proliferation modules, whereas ROR-P<sub>R</sub> emphasized proliferation. Higher proliferation scores were associated with younger age and Black race in both assays. Modifications to the RS<sub>R</sub> algorithm that increased emphasis on proliferation improved prognostication in this diverse population.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ROR-P<sub>R</sub> and the 21-gene RS<sub>R</sub> differentially emphasize estrogen-related and proliferative biology. The emphasis of 21-gene RS on estrogen-related biology and lower endocrine therapy initiation among Black women may contribute to poorer prognostic ability in heterogeneously treated populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO precision oncology\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"e2400137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11555617/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO precision oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO.24.00137\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO precision oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO.24.00137","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Differences in 21-Gene and PAM50 Recurrence Scores in Younger and Black Women With Breast Cancer.
Purpose: Genomic tests, such as the Oncotype Dx 21-gene and Prosigna risk of recurrence (ROR-P) assay, are commonly used for breast cancer prognostication. Emerging data suggest variability between assays, but this has not been compared in diverse populations.
Materials and methods: RNA sequencing was performed on 647 previously untreated stage I-III estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative tumors in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study, which oversampled Black and younger women (age <50 years at diagnosis), using research versions of two common RNA-based prognostic assays: ROR-PR and the 21-gene recurrence score (RSR). Relative frequency differences and 95% CIs were estimated for associations with race and age, and hazards of 5-year local or distant recurrence were modeled with Cox regression. Proliferation and estrogen module scores from each assay, representing broad activity of genes in those pathways, were examined to guide interpretation of differences between tests.
Results: Among both younger and older individuals, Black women had higher frequency of intermediate and high ROR-PR scores than non-Black women. Race was not significantly associated with RSR in either age group. High (hazard ratio [HR], 4.67 [95% CI, 1.73 to 12.70]) and intermediate (HR, 2.12 [95% CI, 0.98 to 4.62]) ROR-PR scores were associated with greater risk of recurrence, but RSR did not predict recurrence. RSR emphasized estrogen over proliferation modules, whereas ROR-PR emphasized proliferation. Higher proliferation scores were associated with younger age and Black race in both assays. Modifications to the RSR algorithm that increased emphasis on proliferation improved prognostication in this diverse population.
Conclusion: ROR-PR and the 21-gene RSR differentially emphasize estrogen-related and proliferative biology. The emphasis of 21-gene RS on estrogen-related biology and lower endocrine therapy initiation among Black women may contribute to poorer prognostic ability in heterogeneously treated populations.