年轻女性和黑人乳腺癌患者的 21 基因和 PAM50 复发评分差异。

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Sarah C Van Alsten, Sanah N Vohra, Joannie M Ivory, Alina M Hamilton, Xiaohua Gao, Erin L Kirk, Eboneé N Butler, H Shelton Earp, Katherine E Reeder-Hayes, Katherine A Hoadley, Lisa A Carey, Melissa A Troester
{"title":"年轻女性和黑人乳腺癌患者的 21 基因和 PAM50 复发评分差异。","authors":"Sarah C Van Alsten, Sanah N Vohra, Joannie M Ivory, Alina M Hamilton, Xiaohua Gao, Erin L Kirk, Eboneé N Butler, H Shelton Earp, Katherine E Reeder-Hayes, Katherine A Hoadley, Lisa A Carey, Melissa A Troester","doi":"10.1200/PO.24.00137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Genomic tests, such as the Oncotype Dx 21-gene and Prosigna risk of recurrence (ROR-P) assay, are commonly used for breast cancer prognostication. Emerging data suggest variability between assays, but this has not been compared in diverse populations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>RNA sequencing was performed on 647 previously untreated stage I-III estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative tumors in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study, which oversampled Black and younger women (age <50 years at diagnosis), using research versions of two common RNA-based prognostic assays: ROR-P<sub>R</sub> and the 21-gene recurrence score (RS<sub>R</sub>). Relative frequency differences and 95% CIs were estimated for associations with race and age, and hazards of 5-year local or distant recurrence were modeled with Cox regression. Proliferation and estrogen module scores from each assay, representing broad activity of genes in those pathways, were examined to guide interpretation of differences between tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among both younger and older individuals, Black women had higher frequency of intermediate and high ROR-P<sub>R</sub> scores than non-Black women. Race was not significantly associated with RS<sub>R</sub> in either age group. High (hazard ratio [HR], 4.67 [95% CI, 1.73 to 12.70]) and intermediate (HR, 2.12 [95% CI, 0.98 to 4.62]) ROR-P<sub>R</sub> scores were associated with greater risk of recurrence, but RS<sub>R</sub> did not predict recurrence. RS<sub>R</sub> emphasized estrogen over proliferation modules, whereas ROR-P<sub>R</sub> emphasized proliferation. Higher proliferation scores were associated with younger age and Black race in both assays. Modifications to the RS<sub>R</sub> algorithm that increased emphasis on proliferation improved prognostication in this diverse population.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ROR-P<sub>R</sub> and the 21-gene RS<sub>R</sub> differentially emphasize estrogen-related and proliferative biology. The emphasis of 21-gene RS on estrogen-related biology and lower endocrine therapy initiation among Black women may contribute to poorer prognostic ability in heterogeneously treated populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":14797,"journal":{"name":"JCO precision oncology","volume":"8 ","pages":"e2400137"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11555617/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in 21-Gene and PAM50 Recurrence Scores in Younger and Black Women With Breast Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah C Van Alsten, Sanah N Vohra, Joannie M Ivory, Alina M Hamilton, Xiaohua Gao, Erin L Kirk, Eboneé N Butler, H Shelton Earp, Katherine E Reeder-Hayes, Katherine A Hoadley, Lisa A Carey, Melissa A Troester\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/PO.24.00137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Genomic tests, such as the Oncotype Dx 21-gene and Prosigna risk of recurrence (ROR-P) assay, are commonly used for breast cancer prognostication. Emerging data suggest variability between assays, but this has not been compared in diverse populations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>RNA sequencing was performed on 647 previously untreated stage I-III estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative tumors in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study, which oversampled Black and younger women (age <50 years at diagnosis), using research versions of two common RNA-based prognostic assays: ROR-P<sub>R</sub> and the 21-gene recurrence score (RS<sub>R</sub>). Relative frequency differences and 95% CIs were estimated for associations with race and age, and hazards of 5-year local or distant recurrence were modeled with Cox regression. Proliferation and estrogen module scores from each assay, representing broad activity of genes in those pathways, were examined to guide interpretation of differences between tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among both younger and older individuals, Black women had higher frequency of intermediate and high ROR-P<sub>R</sub> scores than non-Black women. Race was not significantly associated with RS<sub>R</sub> in either age group. High (hazard ratio [HR], 4.67 [95% CI, 1.73 to 12.70]) and intermediate (HR, 2.12 [95% CI, 0.98 to 4.62]) ROR-P<sub>R</sub> scores were associated with greater risk of recurrence, but RS<sub>R</sub> did not predict recurrence. RS<sub>R</sub> emphasized estrogen over proliferation modules, whereas ROR-P<sub>R</sub> emphasized proliferation. Higher proliferation scores were associated with younger age and Black race in both assays. Modifications to the RS<sub>R</sub> algorithm that increased emphasis on proliferation improved prognostication in this diverse population.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ROR-P<sub>R</sub> and the 21-gene RS<sub>R</sub> differentially emphasize estrogen-related and proliferative biology. The emphasis of 21-gene RS on estrogen-related biology and lower endocrine therapy initiation among Black women may contribute to poorer prognostic ability in heterogeneously treated populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO precision oncology\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"e2400137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11555617/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO precision oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO.24.00137\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO precision oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO.24.00137","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:基因组检测,如 Oncotype Dx 21 基因和 Prosigna 复发风险(ROR-P)检测,常用于乳腺癌预后判断。新出现的数据表明,不同检测方法之间存在差异,但这种差异尚未在不同人群中进行比较:对卡罗莱纳乳腺癌研究(Carolina Breast Cancer Study)中的 647 例既往未经治疗的 I-III 期雌激素受体阳性/人类表皮生长因子受体 2 阴性肿瘤进行了 RNA 测序。估计了与种族和年龄相关的相对频率差异和 95% CI,并用 Cox 回归法建立了 5 年局部或远处复发的危险模型。对每种检测方法的增殖和雌激素模块得分(代表这些通路中基因的广泛活性)进行了检查,以指导对不同检测方法之间差异的解释:结果:在年轻人和老年人中,黑人妇女的 ROR-PR 中级和高级评分频率高于非黑人妇女。在两个年龄组中,种族与 RSR 的关系都不明显。高(危险比 [HR],4.67 [95% CI,1.73 至 12.70])和中(HR,2.12 [95% CI,0.98 至 4.62])ROR-PR 评分与复发风险较高有关,但 RSR 不能预测复发。RSR强调雌激素而非增殖模块,而ROR-PR强调增殖。在这两种检测方法中,较高的增殖得分与较年轻的年龄和黑人种族有关。对RSR算法进行修改,增加了对增殖的重视,从而改善了这一不同人群的预后:结论:ROR-PR 和 21 基因 RSR 不同程度地强调了雌激素相关生物学和增殖生物学。21基因RSR强调雌激素相关生物学特性,而黑人妇女开始接受内分泌治疗的比例较低,这可能会导致异质性治疗人群的预后能力较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differences in 21-Gene and PAM50 Recurrence Scores in Younger and Black Women With Breast Cancer.

Purpose: Genomic tests, such as the Oncotype Dx 21-gene and Prosigna risk of recurrence (ROR-P) assay, are commonly used for breast cancer prognostication. Emerging data suggest variability between assays, but this has not been compared in diverse populations.

Materials and methods: RNA sequencing was performed on 647 previously untreated stage I-III estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative tumors in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study, which oversampled Black and younger women (age <50 years at diagnosis), using research versions of two common RNA-based prognostic assays: ROR-PR and the 21-gene recurrence score (RSR). Relative frequency differences and 95% CIs were estimated for associations with race and age, and hazards of 5-year local or distant recurrence were modeled with Cox regression. Proliferation and estrogen module scores from each assay, representing broad activity of genes in those pathways, were examined to guide interpretation of differences between tests.

Results: Among both younger and older individuals, Black women had higher frequency of intermediate and high ROR-PR scores than non-Black women. Race was not significantly associated with RSR in either age group. High (hazard ratio [HR], 4.67 [95% CI, 1.73 to 12.70]) and intermediate (HR, 2.12 [95% CI, 0.98 to 4.62]) ROR-PR scores were associated with greater risk of recurrence, but RSR did not predict recurrence. RSR emphasized estrogen over proliferation modules, whereas ROR-PR emphasized proliferation. Higher proliferation scores were associated with younger age and Black race in both assays. Modifications to the RSR algorithm that increased emphasis on proliferation improved prognostication in this diverse population.

Conclusion: ROR-PR and the 21-gene RSR differentially emphasize estrogen-related and proliferative biology. The emphasis of 21-gene RS on estrogen-related biology and lower endocrine therapy initiation among Black women may contribute to poorer prognostic ability in heterogeneously treated populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
363
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信