汉语话语标记词 "zhege "和 "nage "的变异语用学:地区和性别的影响

IF 1.8 1区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Jing Zhang
{"title":"汉语话语标记词 \"zhege \"和 \"nage \"的变异语用学:地区和性别的影响","authors":"Jing Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2024.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Discourse markers are critical for maintaining discourse coherence. This study investigated the regional and gender variations of discourse markers <em>zhege</em> and <em>nage</em> in spoken Chinese. In this study, the interactive conversations were collected from native Chinese speakers in Taiwan and Chinese mainland, including 36 males and 50 females in each group. Regarding the influence of region, both groups used a higher number of <em>nage</em> than <em>zhege</em>. And they used <em>zhege</em> and <em>nage</em> in similar conversational situations (i.e., <em>zhege</em> was more often used as resumptive opener than <em>nage</em>, while <em>nage</em> was more frequently used as pause filler than <em>zhege</em>). However, the significant differences in the frequency of <em>zhege</em> and the preference of ‘only use <em>zhege</em>’ were observed between the two groups. Regarding the impact of gender, there existed significant differences in the frequency of <em>zhege</em> and the preference of ‘only use <em>nage</em>’ between Mainland males and females. Also, these differences were found between Mainland and Taiwanese males. By contrast, Taiwanese males and females used <em>zhege</em> and <em>nage</em> in similar ways, as do Mainland and Taiwanese females. It means that region is a more influential factor than gender on the use of <em>zhege</em> and <em>nage</em>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"230 ","pages":"Pages 76-88"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variational pragmatics in Chinese discourse markers zhege and nage: The influence of region and gender\",\"authors\":\"Jing Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pragma.2024.07.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Discourse markers are critical for maintaining discourse coherence. This study investigated the regional and gender variations of discourse markers <em>zhege</em> and <em>nage</em> in spoken Chinese. In this study, the interactive conversations were collected from native Chinese speakers in Taiwan and Chinese mainland, including 36 males and 50 females in each group. Regarding the influence of region, both groups used a higher number of <em>nage</em> than <em>zhege</em>. And they used <em>zhege</em> and <em>nage</em> in similar conversational situations (i.e., <em>zhege</em> was more often used as resumptive opener than <em>nage</em>, while <em>nage</em> was more frequently used as pause filler than <em>zhege</em>). However, the significant differences in the frequency of <em>zhege</em> and the preference of ‘only use <em>zhege</em>’ were observed between the two groups. Regarding the impact of gender, there existed significant differences in the frequency of <em>zhege</em> and the preference of ‘only use <em>nage</em>’ between Mainland males and females. Also, these differences were found between Mainland and Taiwanese males. By contrast, Taiwanese males and females used <em>zhege</em> and <em>nage</em> in similar ways, as do Mainland and Taiwanese females. It means that region is a more influential factor than gender on the use of <em>zhege</em> and <em>nage</em>.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pragmatics\",\"volume\":\"230 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 76-88\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pragmatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216624001267\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216624001267","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

话语标记对于保持话语连贯性至关重要。本研究调查了汉语口语中话语标记 "zhege "和 "nage "的地区和性别差异。本研究收集了中国台湾和中国大陆以汉语为母语者的互动会话,每组包括 36 名男性和 50 名女性。在地区影响方面,两组人都使用了比 "zhege "更多的 "nage"。而且他们在类似的会话情景中使用 "zhege "和 "nage"(即 "zhege "比 "nage "更常用于恢复性开场白,而 "nage "比 "zhege "更常用于停顿填充)。然而,两组学生在 "zhege "的使用频率和 "只使用zhege "的偏好上存在明显差异。至於性別的影響,內地男性和女性在使用 "zhege "的次數和 "只用 nage "的偏好方面均有顯著的差異。此外,大陆和台湾男性之间也存在这些差异。相比之下,台湾男性和女性使用 "zhege "和 "nage "的方式相似,大陆和台湾女性也是如此。这说明地区比性别更能影响 "zhege "和 "nage "的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Variational pragmatics in Chinese discourse markers zhege and nage: The influence of region and gender

Discourse markers are critical for maintaining discourse coherence. This study investigated the regional and gender variations of discourse markers zhege and nage in spoken Chinese. In this study, the interactive conversations were collected from native Chinese speakers in Taiwan and Chinese mainland, including 36 males and 50 females in each group. Regarding the influence of region, both groups used a higher number of nage than zhege. And they used zhege and nage in similar conversational situations (i.e., zhege was more often used as resumptive opener than nage, while nage was more frequently used as pause filler than zhege). However, the significant differences in the frequency of zhege and the preference of ‘only use zhege’ were observed between the two groups. Regarding the impact of gender, there existed significant differences in the frequency of zhege and the preference of ‘only use nage’ between Mainland males and females. Also, these differences were found between Mainland and Taiwanese males. By contrast, Taiwanese males and females used zhege and nage in similar ways, as do Mainland and Taiwanese females. It means that region is a more influential factor than gender on the use of zhege and nage.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
18.80%
发文量
219
期刊介绍: Since 1977, the Journal of Pragmatics has provided a forum for bringing together a wide range of research in pragmatics, including cognitive pragmatics, corpus pragmatics, experimental pragmatics, historical pragmatics, interpersonal pragmatics, multimodal pragmatics, sociopragmatics, theoretical pragmatics and related fields. Our aim is to publish innovative pragmatic scholarship from all perspectives, which contributes to theories of how speakers produce and interpret language in different contexts drawing on attested data from a wide range of languages/cultures in different parts of the world. The Journal of Pragmatics also encourages work that uses attested language data to explore the relationship between pragmatics and neighbouring research areas such as semantics, discourse analysis, conversation analysis and ethnomethodology, interactional linguistics, sociolinguistics, linguistic anthropology, media studies, psychology, sociology, and the philosophy of language. Alongside full-length articles, discussion notes and book reviews, the journal welcomes proposals for high quality special issues in all areas of pragmatics which make a significant contribution to a topical or developing area at the cutting-edge of research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信