基于认知的干预对肢体残疾青少年心理压力的影响:系统回顾与元分析》。

Jiaying Li, Yan Li, Xiaoxiao Mei, Honggu He, Lu Yu, Grace Wing Ka Ho, Engle Angela Chan
{"title":"基于认知的干预对肢体残疾青少年心理压力的影响:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Jiaying Li, Yan Li, Xiaoxiao Mei, Honggu He, Lu Yu, Grace Wing Ka Ho, Engle Angela Chan","doi":"10.1111/inm.13391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adolescents with physical disabilities experience common psychological distress that interacts with impaired physical function. While cognitive-based interventions have been implemented for adolescents with physical disabilities, their effects on enhancing psychological health remain uncertain. This systematic review aimed to synthesise the effects of cognitive-based interventions on the psychological distress of this population and identify optimal components for evidence-based interventions. Following the PRISMA guideline, nine databases were searched to identify eligible randomised controlled trials examining the effects of cognitive-based interventions for adolescents with physical disabilities from inception to October 2023. Data syntheses were performed using the R software, employing random-effects models. Twelve trials involving 1201 participants were identified. The pooled results revealed that cognitive-based interventions did not yield noticeable effects in reducing anxiety (g = -0.43 for postintervention; -0.14 for medium term; -0.37 for long term), depression (g = -0.05 for postintervention; -0.02 for medium term; -0.15 for long term) and stress levels (g = -0.15) over time. The secondary outcome (physical function) improved significantly in the long term compared to the control groups (g = 0.31). Furthermore, this review identified variations in the effectiveness of CBIs among different recipients, durations and modes of delivery. Given the limited number and overall low quality of identified studies for each outcome, conducting high-quality randomised controlled trials is recommended to validate the effectiveness of cognitive-based interventions in reducing psychological distress among adolescents with physical disabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":94051,"journal":{"name":"International journal of mental health nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Cognitive-Based Interventions on Psychological Distress in Adolescents With Physical Disabilities: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jiaying Li, Yan Li, Xiaoxiao Mei, Honggu He, Lu Yu, Grace Wing Ka Ho, Engle Angela Chan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/inm.13391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Adolescents with physical disabilities experience common psychological distress that interacts with impaired physical function. While cognitive-based interventions have been implemented for adolescents with physical disabilities, their effects on enhancing psychological health remain uncertain. This systematic review aimed to synthesise the effects of cognitive-based interventions on the psychological distress of this population and identify optimal components for evidence-based interventions. Following the PRISMA guideline, nine databases were searched to identify eligible randomised controlled trials examining the effects of cognitive-based interventions for adolescents with physical disabilities from inception to October 2023. Data syntheses were performed using the R software, employing random-effects models. Twelve trials involving 1201 participants were identified. The pooled results revealed that cognitive-based interventions did not yield noticeable effects in reducing anxiety (g = -0.43 for postintervention; -0.14 for medium term; -0.37 for long term), depression (g = -0.05 for postintervention; -0.02 for medium term; -0.15 for long term) and stress levels (g = -0.15) over time. The secondary outcome (physical function) improved significantly in the long term compared to the control groups (g = 0.31). Furthermore, this review identified variations in the effectiveness of CBIs among different recipients, durations and modes of delivery. Given the limited number and overall low quality of identified studies for each outcome, conducting high-quality randomised controlled trials is recommended to validate the effectiveness of cognitive-based interventions in reducing psychological distress among adolescents with physical disabilities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of mental health nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of mental health nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.13391\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of mental health nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.13391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肢体残疾青少年普遍存在心理困扰,这种困扰与肢体功能受损相互影响。虽然针对肢体残疾青少年实施了基于认知的干预措施,但这些措施对增强心理健康的效果仍不确定。本系统性综述旨在综合基于认知的干预措施对该人群心理困扰的影响,并确定基于证据的干预措施的最佳组成部分。根据PRISMA指南,我们检索了九个数据库,以确定符合条件的随机对照试验,这些试验研究了从开始到2023年10月期间基于认知的干预措施对肢体残疾青少年的影响。采用随机效应模型,使用 R 软件进行了数据综合。共确定了 12 项试验,涉及 1201 名参与者。汇总结果显示,随着时间的推移,认知干预在降低焦虑(干预后 g = -0.43;中期 -0.14;长期 -0.37)、抑郁(干预后 g = -0.05;中期 -0.02;长期 -0.15)和压力水平(g = -0.15)方面没有产生明显效果。与对照组相比,次要结果(身体机能)在长期有显著改善(g = 0.31)。此外,本综述还发现,不同的接受者、不同的持续时间和不同的实施方式,社区康复倡议的效果也不尽相同。鉴于针对每项结果所确定的研究数量有限且总体质量较低,建议开展高质量的随机对照试验,以验证基于认知的干预措施在减少肢体残疾青少年心理困扰方面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of Cognitive-Based Interventions on Psychological Distress in Adolescents With Physical Disabilities: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Adolescents with physical disabilities experience common psychological distress that interacts with impaired physical function. While cognitive-based interventions have been implemented for adolescents with physical disabilities, their effects on enhancing psychological health remain uncertain. This systematic review aimed to synthesise the effects of cognitive-based interventions on the psychological distress of this population and identify optimal components for evidence-based interventions. Following the PRISMA guideline, nine databases were searched to identify eligible randomised controlled trials examining the effects of cognitive-based interventions for adolescents with physical disabilities from inception to October 2023. Data syntheses were performed using the R software, employing random-effects models. Twelve trials involving 1201 participants were identified. The pooled results revealed that cognitive-based interventions did not yield noticeable effects in reducing anxiety (g = -0.43 for postintervention; -0.14 for medium term; -0.37 for long term), depression (g = -0.05 for postintervention; -0.02 for medium term; -0.15 for long term) and stress levels (g = -0.15) over time. The secondary outcome (physical function) improved significantly in the long term compared to the control groups (g = 0.31). Furthermore, this review identified variations in the effectiveness of CBIs among different recipients, durations and modes of delivery. Given the limited number and overall low quality of identified studies for each outcome, conducting high-quality randomised controlled trials is recommended to validate the effectiveness of cognitive-based interventions in reducing psychological distress among adolescents with physical disabilities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信