一种新颖、互利的师生合作方式,用于开发与临床前医学本科课程相一致的实时形成性评估。

IF 5.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Academic Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-15 DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000005801
William E Schwartzman, Samuel N Paul, Chloe Amsterdam, Galo Bustamante, Vamsee Vemulapalli, Melissa M Quinn, Christopher R Pierson
{"title":"一种新颖、互利的师生合作方式,用于开发与临床前医学本科课程相一致的实时形成性评估。","authors":"William E Schwartzman, Samuel N Paul, Chloe Amsterdam, Galo Bustamante, Vamsee Vemulapalli, Melissa M Quinn, Christopher R Pierson","doi":"10.1097/ACM.0000000000005801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Problem: </strong>A shortage of curriculum-aligned formative multiple-choice questions (FMCQs) remains despite their known learning benefits in preclinical medical education due to limitations on teaching faculty time and other reasons. In response, students often use extramural resources such as commercial or collaborative question banks; however, these options are often expensive and cannot be aligned with the content of each school's unique curriculum. In addition, students need feedback on their learning in a manner that parallels the format of summative assessments. In this pilot, the authors aimed to enhance student learning by creating an intramural formative practice resource that was developed as the curriculum unfolded under the direction of the faculty leading the concurrently running curricular units.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>The authors developed a workflow known as Professor-Reviewed Exam Practice (PREP) in 2023. PREP partnered with preclinical medical students and faculty to create vignette-style, single-best-response FMCQs with feedback for every lecture and self-guided learning module in multiple preclinical blocks of The Ohio State University College of Medicine undergraduate medical curriculum.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>PREP established a sustainable, student-led, faculty-guided workflow that created high-quality, curriculum-aligned FMCQs for student use in the preclinical medical curriculum over a 14-month period. Usage rates were high across multiple preclinical blocks, reflecting high student demand for FMCQs of this nature and their value as a study aid. Survey data showed faculty agreed that their time commitment and role in the PREP workflow was appropriate.</p><p><strong>Next steps: </strong>Future work will evaluate the benefits of PREP to students by exploring the potential impact of PREP FMCQs on summative assessment performance and if writing FMCQs confers benefits to PREP team members. Faculty survey indicated that performance data from PREP FMCQs could be used to tailor upcoming teaching and learning methods, which is an area for future inquiry.</p>","PeriodicalId":50929,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"33-37"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Novel, Mutually Beneficial Student-Faculty Partnership to Develop Real-Time Formative Assessments Aligning With the Preclinical Undergraduate Medical Curriculum.\",\"authors\":\"William E Schwartzman, Samuel N Paul, Chloe Amsterdam, Galo Bustamante, Vamsee Vemulapalli, Melissa M Quinn, Christopher R Pierson\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ACM.0000000000005801\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Problem: </strong>A shortage of curriculum-aligned formative multiple-choice questions (FMCQs) remains despite their known learning benefits in preclinical medical education due to limitations on teaching faculty time and other reasons. In response, students often use extramural resources such as commercial or collaborative question banks; however, these options are often expensive and cannot be aligned with the content of each school's unique curriculum. In addition, students need feedback on their learning in a manner that parallels the format of summative assessments. In this pilot, the authors aimed to enhance student learning by creating an intramural formative practice resource that was developed as the curriculum unfolded under the direction of the faculty leading the concurrently running curricular units.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>The authors developed a workflow known as Professor-Reviewed Exam Practice (PREP) in 2023. PREP partnered with preclinical medical students and faculty to create vignette-style, single-best-response FMCQs with feedback for every lecture and self-guided learning module in multiple preclinical blocks of The Ohio State University College of Medicine undergraduate medical curriculum.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>PREP established a sustainable, student-led, faculty-guided workflow that created high-quality, curriculum-aligned FMCQs for student use in the preclinical medical curriculum over a 14-month period. Usage rates were high across multiple preclinical blocks, reflecting high student demand for FMCQs of this nature and their value as a study aid. Survey data showed faculty agreed that their time commitment and role in the PREP workflow was appropriate.</p><p><strong>Next steps: </strong>Future work will evaluate the benefits of PREP to students by exploring the potential impact of PREP FMCQs on summative assessment performance and if writing FMCQs confers benefits to PREP team members. Faculty survey indicated that performance data from PREP FMCQs could be used to tailor upcoming teaching and learning methods, which is an area for future inquiry.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"33-37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005801\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005801","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

问题:由于教师时间有限等原因,尽管已知形成性多项选择题(FMCQ)在临床前医学教育中具有学习优势,但与课程相匹配的形成性多项选择题(FMCQ)仍然短缺。为此,学生通常会使用商业题库或合作题库等校外资源;然而,这些选择往往价格昂贵,而且无法与各学校独特的课程内容保持一致。此外,学生需要以与终结性评估相似的方式获得学习反馈。在这个试点项目中,作者旨在通过创建一个校内形成性练习资源来提高学生的学习效果,该资源是在同时运行的课程单元的教师指导下,随着课程的展开而开发的:作者在 2023 年开发了一个名为 "教授审查考试实践(PREP)"的工作流程。PREP与临床前医学专业的学生和教师合作,为俄亥俄州立大学医学院本科医学课程多个临床前教学单元中的每个讲座和自学模块创建小节式、单一最佳反应的FMCQ,并提供反馈:PREP 建立了一个以学生为主导、教师为指导的可持续工作流程,在 14 个月的时间内创建了高质量、与课程相一致的 FMCQ,供学生在临床前医学课程中使用。多个临床前教学单元的使用率都很高,这反映出学生对此类性质的 FMCQs 的需求量很大,而且其作为学习辅助工具的价值也很高。调查数据显示,教师们认为他们在 PREP 工作流程中投入的时间和扮演的角色是合适的:今后的工作将通过探索 PREP FMCQ 对终结性评估成绩的潜在影响,以及撰写 FMCQ 是否会给 PREP 小组成员带来益处,来评估 PREP 给学生带来的益处。教师调查显示,PREP FMCQs 的成绩数据可用于调整即将采用的教学方法,这也是未来研究的一个领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Novel, Mutually Beneficial Student-Faculty Partnership to Develop Real-Time Formative Assessments Aligning With the Preclinical Undergraduate Medical Curriculum.

Problem: A shortage of curriculum-aligned formative multiple-choice questions (FMCQs) remains despite their known learning benefits in preclinical medical education due to limitations on teaching faculty time and other reasons. In response, students often use extramural resources such as commercial or collaborative question banks; however, these options are often expensive and cannot be aligned with the content of each school's unique curriculum. In addition, students need feedback on their learning in a manner that parallels the format of summative assessments. In this pilot, the authors aimed to enhance student learning by creating an intramural formative practice resource that was developed as the curriculum unfolded under the direction of the faculty leading the concurrently running curricular units.

Approach: The authors developed a workflow known as Professor-Reviewed Exam Practice (PREP) in 2023. PREP partnered with preclinical medical students and faculty to create vignette-style, single-best-response FMCQs with feedback for every lecture and self-guided learning module in multiple preclinical blocks of The Ohio State University College of Medicine undergraduate medical curriculum.

Outcomes: PREP established a sustainable, student-led, faculty-guided workflow that created high-quality, curriculum-aligned FMCQs for student use in the preclinical medical curriculum over a 14-month period. Usage rates were high across multiple preclinical blocks, reflecting high student demand for FMCQs of this nature and their value as a study aid. Survey data showed faculty agreed that their time commitment and role in the PREP workflow was appropriate.

Next steps: Future work will evaluate the benefits of PREP to students by exploring the potential impact of PREP FMCQs on summative assessment performance and if writing FMCQs confers benefits to PREP team members. Faculty survey indicated that performance data from PREP FMCQs could be used to tailor upcoming teaching and learning methods, which is an area for future inquiry.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Medicine
Academic Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
982
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, acts as an international forum for exchanging ideas, information, and strategies to address the significant challenges in academic medicine. The journal covers areas such as research, education, clinical care, community collaboration, and leadership, with a commitment to serving the public interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信