评估弯曲根管中碎片的挤出:各种单丝锉根管器械系统的体外分析

IF 1.9 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
International Journal of Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-07-05 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/8367693
Muhammad Zubair Ahmad
{"title":"评估弯曲根管中碎片的挤出:各种单丝锉根管器械系统的体外分析","authors":"Muhammad Zubair Ahmad","doi":"10.1155/2024/8367693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Rotary single-file endodontic systems are commonly used for root canal treatment. However, very few studies have evaluated the apical extrusion of debris generated by these systems during canal preparation at normal body temperature in laboratory conditions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the amount of apically extruded debris caused by seven different single-file endodontic instrumentation systems at body temperature in mandibular molar teeth with curved root canals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred forty mandibular first permanent molars were randomly divided into seven groups (<i>n</i> = 20) to be prepared by one of the following systems at 35°C: Reciproc Blue (REC Blue), WaveOne Gold (WOG), One Reci (OR), Neoniti, HyFlex EDM (HEDM), One Curve (OC), or XP Shaper (XPS). Debris was collected into preweighted Eppendorf tubes. The weight of the extruded debris was recorded by subtracting the weight of the tooth-free apparatus from the post-procedure weight. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's tests (<i>p</i>  < 5%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>REC Blue, WOG, and OR groups extruded significantly more debris from the apex than XPS, OC, and Neoniti groups (<i>p</i>  < 0.05). No significant difference was observed among the XPS, OC, Neoniti, and HEDM groups (<i>p</i>  > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All the instruments were associated with debris extrusion. However, REC Blue, WOG, and OR extrude significantly more debris than other instruments. The amount of debris with different files was REC Blue > OR > WOG > HEDM > OC > Neoniti > XPS. XPS, Neoniti, and OC caused significantly less extrusion of debris than REC Blue, WOG, and OR.</p>","PeriodicalId":13947,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Dentistry","volume":"2024 ","pages":"8367693"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11245337/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Debris Extrusion in Curved Canals: An In Vitro Analysis of Various Single-File Endodontic Instrumentation Systems.\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Zubair Ahmad\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/8367693\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Rotary single-file endodontic systems are commonly used for root canal treatment. However, very few studies have evaluated the apical extrusion of debris generated by these systems during canal preparation at normal body temperature in laboratory conditions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the amount of apically extruded debris caused by seven different single-file endodontic instrumentation systems at body temperature in mandibular molar teeth with curved root canals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred forty mandibular first permanent molars were randomly divided into seven groups (<i>n</i> = 20) to be prepared by one of the following systems at 35°C: Reciproc Blue (REC Blue), WaveOne Gold (WOG), One Reci (OR), Neoniti, HyFlex EDM (HEDM), One Curve (OC), or XP Shaper (XPS). Debris was collected into preweighted Eppendorf tubes. The weight of the extruded debris was recorded by subtracting the weight of the tooth-free apparatus from the post-procedure weight. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's tests (<i>p</i>  < 5%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>REC Blue, WOG, and OR groups extruded significantly more debris from the apex than XPS, OC, and Neoniti groups (<i>p</i>  < 0.05). No significant difference was observed among the XPS, OC, Neoniti, and HEDM groups (<i>p</i>  > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All the instruments were associated with debris extrusion. However, REC Blue, WOG, and OR extrude significantly more debris than other instruments. The amount of debris with different files was REC Blue > OR > WOG > HEDM > OC > Neoniti > XPS. XPS, Neoniti, and OC caused significantly less extrusion of debris than REC Blue, WOG, and OR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"2024 \",\"pages\":\"8367693\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11245337/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/8367693\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/8367693","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:旋转式单档根管治疗系统常用于根管治疗。然而,很少有研究对这些系统在实验室正常体温条件下进行根管预备时产生的根尖挤压碎屑进行评估。本研究的目的是评估七种不同的单档根管器械系统在体温下对具有弯曲根管的下颌磨牙造成的根尖碎片挤出量:将140颗下颌第一恒磨牙随机分为七组(n = 20),在35°C下使用下列系统之一进行预备:Reciproc Blue (REC Blue)、WaveOne Gold (WOG)、One Reci (OR)、Neoniti、HyFlex EDM (HEDM)、One Curve (OC) 或 XP Shaper (XPS)。碎片被收集到预先称重的 Eppendorf 管中。从手术后重量中减去无齿器械的重量,记录挤出碎片的重量。数据分析采用单因素方差分析和 Tukey 检验(P < 5%):结果:REC Blue、WOG 和 OR 组从顶点挤出的碎屑明显多于 XPS、OC 和 Neoniti 组(p < 0.05)。XPS、OC、Neoniti 和 HEDM 组之间无明显差异(P > 0.05):结论:所有器械都与碎片挤出有关。但REC Blue、WOG和OR挤出的碎屑明显多于其他器械。不同器械的碎屑量依次为:REC Blue > OR > WOG > HEDM > OC > Neoniti > XPS。XPS、Neoniti和OC造成的碎屑挤出量明显少于REC Blue、WOG和OR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of Debris Extrusion in Curved Canals: An In Vitro Analysis of Various Single-File Endodontic Instrumentation Systems.

Objectives: Rotary single-file endodontic systems are commonly used for root canal treatment. However, very few studies have evaluated the apical extrusion of debris generated by these systems during canal preparation at normal body temperature in laboratory conditions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the amount of apically extruded debris caused by seven different single-file endodontic instrumentation systems at body temperature in mandibular molar teeth with curved root canals.

Methods: One hundred forty mandibular first permanent molars were randomly divided into seven groups (n = 20) to be prepared by one of the following systems at 35°C: Reciproc Blue (REC Blue), WaveOne Gold (WOG), One Reci (OR), Neoniti, HyFlex EDM (HEDM), One Curve (OC), or XP Shaper (XPS). Debris was collected into preweighted Eppendorf tubes. The weight of the extruded debris was recorded by subtracting the weight of the tooth-free apparatus from the post-procedure weight. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's tests (p  < 5%).

Results: REC Blue, WOG, and OR groups extruded significantly more debris from the apex than XPS, OC, and Neoniti groups (p  < 0.05). No significant difference was observed among the XPS, OC, Neoniti, and HEDM groups (p  > 0.05).

Conclusion: All the instruments were associated with debris extrusion. However, REC Blue, WOG, and OR extrude significantly more debris than other instruments. The amount of debris with different files was REC Blue > OR > WOG > HEDM > OC > Neoniti > XPS. XPS, Neoniti, and OC caused significantly less extrusion of debris than REC Blue, WOG, and OR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Dentistry
International Journal of Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
219
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信