公共交通自动化对农村居民(群体)的个人无障碍影响

IF 2 4区 工程技术 Q3 TRANSPORTATION
Alberto Dianin , Michael Gidam , Elisa Ravazzoli , Agnieszka Elzbieta Stawinoga , Georg Hauger
{"title":"公共交通自动化对农村居民(群体)的个人无障碍影响","authors":"Alberto Dianin ,&nbsp;Michael Gidam ,&nbsp;Elisa Ravazzoli ,&nbsp;Agnieszka Elzbieta Stawinoga ,&nbsp;Georg Hauger","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubtr.2024.100098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Rural areas typically register low accessibility. This fact negatively affects their attractiveness, the well-being of their population in general, and population subgroups with limited access to private cars or strong space-time constraints (like minors, the elderly or members of large households). Collective autonomous vehicles (AVs) might improve this situation, e.g. by enhancing standard line-based services or introducing alternative shared schemes. Nevertheless, the collective usage of AVs in rural transport and their potential impacts on accessibility are still underexplored, with most research focused on the urban context. This study aims to fill this gap by analysing the public transport accessibility impacts that five alternative AV supply scenarios might generate in the rural valley of Mühlwald (South Tyrol, Italy). To this end, a variant of the standard space-time accessibility model developed by the authors is used. This focuses on accessibility by public transport specifically, and measures it to both fixed activities and discretionary opportunities. Accessibility impacts are first estimated at the person-based level for a sample of residents. Then, they are aggregated for the whole sample and six subgroups that tend to experience more substantial accessibility issues based on the literature. Results show that line-based AV applications provide limited accessibility benefits. Conversely, time-flexible applications like ride-shared vans or combinations of line-based trunks and on-demand feeders over peak and off-peak hours may provide the most evident advantages, especially for the subgroups with the tightest space-time schedules. Although these results do not reflect other possible impacts of AVs (e.g. environmental effects), they provide policymakers with valuable insights into the collective AV usages that could be most suitable in the rural context regarding person-based accessibility gains.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47173,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Transportation","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 100098"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1077291X24000183/pdfft?md5=0b225aa1845ebb2522bb406c82ae7d84&pid=1-s2.0-S1077291X24000183-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individual accessibility impacts of public transport automation on (groups of) rural dwellers\",\"authors\":\"Alberto Dianin ,&nbsp;Michael Gidam ,&nbsp;Elisa Ravazzoli ,&nbsp;Agnieszka Elzbieta Stawinoga ,&nbsp;Georg Hauger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpubtr.2024.100098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Rural areas typically register low accessibility. This fact negatively affects their attractiveness, the well-being of their population in general, and population subgroups with limited access to private cars or strong space-time constraints (like minors, the elderly or members of large households). Collective autonomous vehicles (AVs) might improve this situation, e.g. by enhancing standard line-based services or introducing alternative shared schemes. Nevertheless, the collective usage of AVs in rural transport and their potential impacts on accessibility are still underexplored, with most research focused on the urban context. This study aims to fill this gap by analysing the public transport accessibility impacts that five alternative AV supply scenarios might generate in the rural valley of Mühlwald (South Tyrol, Italy). To this end, a variant of the standard space-time accessibility model developed by the authors is used. This focuses on accessibility by public transport specifically, and measures it to both fixed activities and discretionary opportunities. Accessibility impacts are first estimated at the person-based level for a sample of residents. Then, they are aggregated for the whole sample and six subgroups that tend to experience more substantial accessibility issues based on the literature. Results show that line-based AV applications provide limited accessibility benefits. Conversely, time-flexible applications like ride-shared vans or combinations of line-based trunks and on-demand feeders over peak and off-peak hours may provide the most evident advantages, especially for the subgroups with the tightest space-time schedules. Although these results do not reflect other possible impacts of AVs (e.g. environmental effects), they provide policymakers with valuable insights into the collective AV usages that could be most suitable in the rural context regarding person-based accessibility gains.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Transportation\",\"volume\":\"26 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100098\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1077291X24000183/pdfft?md5=0b225aa1845ebb2522bb406c82ae7d84&pid=1-s2.0-S1077291X24000183-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Transportation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1077291X24000183\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1077291X24000183","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

农村地区通常交通不便。这一事实对农村地区的吸引力、一般居民的福利以及使用私家车机会有限或有强烈时空限制的人群(如未成年人、老年人或大家庭成员)产生了负面影响。集体自动驾驶汽车(AVs)可能会改善这种状况,例如通过加强标准线路服务或引入其他共享方案。然而,人们对农村交通中集体自动驾驶汽车的使用及其对无障碍环境的潜在影响仍未进行充分探索,大多数研究都集中在城市环境中。本研究旨在填补这一空白,通过分析五种可供选择的自动驾驶汽车供应方案可能对 Mühlwald(意大利南蒂罗尔)农村山谷的公共交通可达性产生的影响。为此,本文采用了作者开发的标准时空可达性模型的变体。该模型特别关注公共交通的可达性,并对固定活动和自由支配机会进行衡量。首先,对居民样本进行以个人为单位的可达性影响估算。然后,根据文献资料,对整个样本和倾向于遇到更多无障碍问题的六个子群体进行汇总。结果表明,基于线路的视听应用提供的无障碍优势有限。相反,时间灵活的应用,如共享单车或高峰和非高峰时段的线路干线和按需接驳的组合,可能会带来最明显的优势,特别是对于时空安排最紧张的子群体。尽管这些结果并没有反映出自动驾驶汽车可能产生的其他影响(如环境影响),但它们为决策者提供了宝贵的见解,使他们了解到在农村地区,在以人为本的无障碍环境方面,自动驾驶汽车的集体使用可能是最合适的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Individual accessibility impacts of public transport automation on (groups of) rural dwellers

Rural areas typically register low accessibility. This fact negatively affects their attractiveness, the well-being of their population in general, and population subgroups with limited access to private cars or strong space-time constraints (like minors, the elderly or members of large households). Collective autonomous vehicles (AVs) might improve this situation, e.g. by enhancing standard line-based services or introducing alternative shared schemes. Nevertheless, the collective usage of AVs in rural transport and their potential impacts on accessibility are still underexplored, with most research focused on the urban context. This study aims to fill this gap by analysing the public transport accessibility impacts that five alternative AV supply scenarios might generate in the rural valley of Mühlwald (South Tyrol, Italy). To this end, a variant of the standard space-time accessibility model developed by the authors is used. This focuses on accessibility by public transport specifically, and measures it to both fixed activities and discretionary opportunities. Accessibility impacts are first estimated at the person-based level for a sample of residents. Then, they are aggregated for the whole sample and six subgroups that tend to experience more substantial accessibility issues based on the literature. Results show that line-based AV applications provide limited accessibility benefits. Conversely, time-flexible applications like ride-shared vans or combinations of line-based trunks and on-demand feeders over peak and off-peak hours may provide the most evident advantages, especially for the subgroups with the tightest space-time schedules. Although these results do not reflect other possible impacts of AVs (e.g. environmental effects), they provide policymakers with valuable insights into the collective AV usages that could be most suitable in the rural context regarding person-based accessibility gains.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Transportation, affiliated with the Center for Urban Transportation Research, is an international peer-reviewed open access journal focused on various forms of public transportation. It publishes original research from diverse academic disciplines, including engineering, economics, planning, and policy, emphasizing innovative solutions to transportation challenges. Content covers mobility services available to the general public, such as line-based services and shared fleets, offering insights beneficial to passengers, agencies, service providers, and communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信