左侧额叶下回对恐惧消退的影响:经颅直流电刺激研究

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Yuanbo Ma , Fujia Jiao , Giorgi Batsikadze , Fatemeh Yavari , Michael A. Nitsche
{"title":"左侧额叶下回对恐惧消退的影响:经颅直流电刺激研究","authors":"Yuanbo Ma ,&nbsp;Fujia Jiao ,&nbsp;Giorgi Batsikadze ,&nbsp;Fatemeh Yavari ,&nbsp;Michael A. Nitsche","doi":"10.1016/j.brs.2024.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Fear extinction is a fundamental component of exposure-based therapies for anxiety-related disorders. The renewal of fear in a different context after extinction highlights the importance of contextual factors. In this study, we aimed to investigate the causal role of the left inferior frontal gyrus (LiFG) in the context-dependency of fear extinction learning via administration of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over this area.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>180 healthy subjects were assigned to 9 groups: 3 tDCS conditions (anodal, cathodal, and sham) × 3 context combinations (AAA, ABA, and ABB). The fear conditioning/extinction task was conducted over three consecutive days: acquisition, extinction learning, and extinction recall. tDCS (2 mA, 10min) was administered during the extinction learning phase over the LiFG via a 4-electrode montage. Skin conductance response (SCR) data and self-report assessments were collected.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During the extinction learning phase, groups with excitability-enhancing anodal tDCS showed a significantly higher fear response to the threat cues compared to cathodal and sham stimulation conditions, irrespective of contextual factors. This effect was stable until the extinction recall phase. Additionally, excitability-reducing cathodal tDCS caused a significant decrease of the response difference between the threat and safety cues during the extinction recall phase. The self-report assessments showed no significant differences between the conditions throughout the experiment.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Independent of the context, excitability enhancement of the LiFG did impair fear extinction, and led to preservation of fear memory. In contrast, excitability reduction of this area enhanced fear extinction retention. These findings imply that the LiFG plays a role in the fear extinction network, which seems to be however context-independent.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9206,"journal":{"name":"Brain Stimulation","volume":"17 4","pages":"Pages 816-825"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X24001190/pdfft?md5=9a908b2d96391c19f1f182db342cba73&pid=1-s2.0-S1935861X24001190-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of the left inferior frontal gyrus on fear extinction: A transcranial direct current stimulation study\",\"authors\":\"Yuanbo Ma ,&nbsp;Fujia Jiao ,&nbsp;Giorgi Batsikadze ,&nbsp;Fatemeh Yavari ,&nbsp;Michael A. Nitsche\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.brs.2024.07.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Fear extinction is a fundamental component of exposure-based therapies for anxiety-related disorders. The renewal of fear in a different context after extinction highlights the importance of contextual factors. In this study, we aimed to investigate the causal role of the left inferior frontal gyrus (LiFG) in the context-dependency of fear extinction learning via administration of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over this area.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>180 healthy subjects were assigned to 9 groups: 3 tDCS conditions (anodal, cathodal, and sham) × 3 context combinations (AAA, ABA, and ABB). The fear conditioning/extinction task was conducted over three consecutive days: acquisition, extinction learning, and extinction recall. tDCS (2 mA, 10min) was administered during the extinction learning phase over the LiFG via a 4-electrode montage. Skin conductance response (SCR) data and self-report assessments were collected.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During the extinction learning phase, groups with excitability-enhancing anodal tDCS showed a significantly higher fear response to the threat cues compared to cathodal and sham stimulation conditions, irrespective of contextual factors. This effect was stable until the extinction recall phase. Additionally, excitability-reducing cathodal tDCS caused a significant decrease of the response difference between the threat and safety cues during the extinction recall phase. The self-report assessments showed no significant differences between the conditions throughout the experiment.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Independent of the context, excitability enhancement of the LiFG did impair fear extinction, and led to preservation of fear memory. In contrast, excitability reduction of this area enhanced fear extinction retention. These findings imply that the LiFG plays a role in the fear extinction network, which seems to be however context-independent.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain Stimulation\",\"volume\":\"17 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 816-825\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X24001190/pdfft?md5=9a908b2d96391c19f1f182db342cba73&pid=1-s2.0-S1935861X24001190-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain Stimulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X24001190\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Stimulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X24001190","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介恐惧消退是暴露疗法治疗焦虑相关疾病的基本组成部分。恐惧感消退后,在不同的情境中又会重新出现,这凸显了情境因素的重要性。本研究旨在通过对左侧额叶下回(LiFG)进行经颅直流电刺激(tDCS),研究该区域在恐惧消退学习的情境依赖性中的因果作用。方法:将 180 名健康受试者分为 9 组:3 种 tDCS 条件(阳极、阴极和假刺激)×3 种情境组合(AAA、ABA 和 ABB)。恐惧条件反射/消退任务连续进行三天:习得、消退学习和消退回忆。在消退学习阶段,通过 4 个电极蒙太奇在 LiFG 上施用 tDCS(2mA,10 分钟)。收集了皮肤传导反应(SCR)数据和自我报告评估:结果:在消退学习阶段,与阴极刺激和假刺激条件相比,接受兴奋性增强阳极tDCS刺激的组对威胁线索的恐惧反应明显更高,与情境因素无关。这种效应在消退回忆阶段之前一直保持稳定。此外,在消退回忆阶段,降低兴奋性的阴极 tDCS 能显著降低威胁和安全线索之间的反应差异。自我报告评估显示,在整个实验过程中,不同条件下的反应差异并不明显:结论:与情境无关,LiFG兴奋性的增强确实会损害恐惧的消退,并导致恐惧记忆的保留。与此相反,该区域兴奋性降低会增强恐惧消退记忆的保持。这些研究结果表明,LiFG在恐惧消退网络中发挥着作用,但这似乎与情境无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of the left inferior frontal gyrus on fear extinction: A transcranial direct current stimulation study

Introduction

Fear extinction is a fundamental component of exposure-based therapies for anxiety-related disorders. The renewal of fear in a different context after extinction highlights the importance of contextual factors. In this study, we aimed to investigate the causal role of the left inferior frontal gyrus (LiFG) in the context-dependency of fear extinction learning via administration of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over this area.

Methods

180 healthy subjects were assigned to 9 groups: 3 tDCS conditions (anodal, cathodal, and sham) × 3 context combinations (AAA, ABA, and ABB). The fear conditioning/extinction task was conducted over three consecutive days: acquisition, extinction learning, and extinction recall. tDCS (2 mA, 10min) was administered during the extinction learning phase over the LiFG via a 4-electrode montage. Skin conductance response (SCR) data and self-report assessments were collected.

Results

During the extinction learning phase, groups with excitability-enhancing anodal tDCS showed a significantly higher fear response to the threat cues compared to cathodal and sham stimulation conditions, irrespective of contextual factors. This effect was stable until the extinction recall phase. Additionally, excitability-reducing cathodal tDCS caused a significant decrease of the response difference between the threat and safety cues during the extinction recall phase. The self-report assessments showed no significant differences between the conditions throughout the experiment.

Conclusion

Independent of the context, excitability enhancement of the LiFG did impair fear extinction, and led to preservation of fear memory. In contrast, excitability reduction of this area enhanced fear extinction retention. These findings imply that the LiFG plays a role in the fear extinction network, which seems to be however context-independent.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain Stimulation
Brain Stimulation 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
256
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: Brain Stimulation publishes on the entire field of brain stimulation, including noninvasive and invasive techniques and technologies that alter brain function through the use of electrical, magnetic, radiowave, or focally targeted pharmacologic stimulation. Brain Stimulation aims to be the premier journal for publication of original research in the field of neuromodulation. The journal includes: a) Original articles; b) Short Communications; c) Invited and original reviews; d) Technology and methodological perspectives (reviews of new devices, description of new methods, etc.); and e) Letters to the Editor. Special issues of the journal will be considered based on scientific merit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信