在生命周期评估中考虑产品再利用和维修的影响

IF 5.3 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
John Baxter, Pieter Callewaert, Rannvá Danielsen
{"title":"在生命周期评估中考虑产品再利用和维修的影响","authors":"John Baxter,&nbsp;Pieter Callewaert,&nbsp;Rannvá Danielsen","doi":"10.1016/j.clet.2024.100774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sustainability and life-cycle assessment (LCA) studies of circular product value chains show evidence of considerable difficulty in capturing events such as product reuse and repair, because of unclear and uncertain representation of product displacement and behavioural-related factors. The present study examines how an approach based on displacement of product function and direct calculation of environmental impacts across partial life cycles might remedy these issues. A calculation framework based on the concept of environmental value and its depreciation along a life cycle is presented. Results for two value chains with qualitatively quite different features illustrate the utility and flexibility of the framework. The work offers significant conceptual advances in both recognising and measuring the relative impacts of using newer or older products providing the same function. As such it determines tangible environmental benefits for the use of older products which is a pre-requisite for reduced overall consumption and macro-level sustainability improvement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34618,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Engineering and Technology","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100774"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666790824000545/pdfft?md5=56cd8d89f2b8aadf8c3eea7bae4beeb7&pid=1-s2.0-S2666790824000545-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accounting the effects of product reuse and repair in life-cycle assessment\",\"authors\":\"John Baxter,&nbsp;Pieter Callewaert,&nbsp;Rannvá Danielsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clet.2024.100774\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Sustainability and life-cycle assessment (LCA) studies of circular product value chains show evidence of considerable difficulty in capturing events such as product reuse and repair, because of unclear and uncertain representation of product displacement and behavioural-related factors. The present study examines how an approach based on displacement of product function and direct calculation of environmental impacts across partial life cycles might remedy these issues. A calculation framework based on the concept of environmental value and its depreciation along a life cycle is presented. Results for two value chains with qualitatively quite different features illustrate the utility and flexibility of the framework. The work offers significant conceptual advances in both recognising and measuring the relative impacts of using newer or older products providing the same function. As such it determines tangible environmental benefits for the use of older products which is a pre-requisite for reduced overall consumption and macro-level sustainability improvement.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleaner Engineering and Technology\",\"volume\":\"21 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100774\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666790824000545/pdfft?md5=56cd8d89f2b8aadf8c3eea7bae4beeb7&pid=1-s2.0-S2666790824000545-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleaner Engineering and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666790824000545\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666790824000545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

循环产品价值链的可持续性和生命周期评估(LCA)研究表明,由于产品替代和行为相关因素的表述不清晰、不确定,在捕捉产品再利用和维修等事件方面存在相当大的困难。本研究探讨了基于产品功能置换和直接计算部分生命周期环境影响的方法如何解决这些问题。研究提出了一个基于环境价值概念及其在生命周期中贬值的计算框架。两条价值链的结果在质量上有很大不同,这说明了该框架的实用性和灵活性。这项工作在认识和衡量使用具有相同功能的较新或较旧产品的相对影响方面取得了重大的概念进步。因此,它确定了使用旧产品的有形环境效益,这是减少总体消费和宏观层面可持续发展改善的先决条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accounting the effects of product reuse and repair in life-cycle assessment

Sustainability and life-cycle assessment (LCA) studies of circular product value chains show evidence of considerable difficulty in capturing events such as product reuse and repair, because of unclear and uncertain representation of product displacement and behavioural-related factors. The present study examines how an approach based on displacement of product function and direct calculation of environmental impacts across partial life cycles might remedy these issues. A calculation framework based on the concept of environmental value and its depreciation along a life cycle is presented. Results for two value chains with qualitatively quite different features illustrate the utility and flexibility of the framework. The work offers significant conceptual advances in both recognising and measuring the relative impacts of using newer or older products providing the same function. As such it determines tangible environmental benefits for the use of older products which is a pre-requisite for reduced overall consumption and macro-level sustainability improvement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cleaner Engineering and Technology
Cleaner Engineering and Technology Engineering-Engineering (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
218
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信