基于人工智能的鼻窦 CT 分析平台与嗅觉评估的多机构验证。

IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Conner J. Massey MD, Stephen M. Humphries PhD, Jess C. Mace MPH, Timothy L. Smith MD, MPH, Zachary M. Soler MD, MSc, Vijay R. Ramakrishnan MD
{"title":"基于人工智能的鼻窦 CT 分析平台与嗅觉评估的多机构验证。","authors":"Conner J. Massey MD,&nbsp;Stephen M. Humphries PhD,&nbsp;Jess C. Mace MPH,&nbsp;Timothy L. Smith MD, MPH,&nbsp;Zachary M. Soler MD, MSc,&nbsp;Vijay R. Ramakrishnan MD","doi":"10.1002/alr.23410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Key points</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>\n <p>AI-based CT sinus analysis may have advantages over visual based systems, for example, Lund–Mackay score.</p>\n </li>\n \n <li>\n <p>Here, we show multi-institutional validation of an AI algorithm using novel OMC classification.</p>\n </li>\n \n <li>\n <p>Significant, robust correlations are seen between algorithm outputs and clinical outcomes.</p>\n </li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13716,"journal":{"name":"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11530322/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-institutional validation of an AI-based sinus CT analytic platform with olfactory assessments\",\"authors\":\"Conner J. Massey MD,&nbsp;Stephen M. Humphries PhD,&nbsp;Jess C. Mace MPH,&nbsp;Timothy L. Smith MD, MPH,&nbsp;Zachary M. Soler MD, MSc,&nbsp;Vijay R. Ramakrishnan MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/alr.23410\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Key points</h3>\\n \\n <div>\\n <ul>\\n \\n <li>\\n <p>AI-based CT sinus analysis may have advantages over visual based systems, for example, Lund–Mackay score.</p>\\n </li>\\n \\n <li>\\n <p>Here, we show multi-institutional validation of an AI algorithm using novel OMC classification.</p>\\n </li>\\n \\n <li>\\n <p>Significant, robust correlations are seen between algorithm outputs and clinical outcomes.</p>\\n </li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11530322/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alr.23410\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alr.23410","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

要点:与基于视觉的系统(如 Lund-Mackay 评分)相比,基于人工智能的 CT 窦分析可能更具优势。在此,我们展示了使用新型 OMC 分类的人工智能算法的多机构验证。算法输出与临床结果之间存在显著、稳健的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Multi-institutional validation of an AI-based sinus CT analytic platform with olfactory assessments

Multi-institutional validation of an AI-based sinus CT analytic platform with olfactory assessments

Key points

  • AI-based CT sinus analysis may have advantages over visual based systems, for example, Lund–Mackay score.

  • Here, we show multi-institutional validation of an AI algorithm using novel OMC classification.

  • Significant, robust correlations are seen between algorithm outputs and clinical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
10.90%
发文量
185
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Forum of Allergy & Rhinologyis a peer-reviewed scientific journal, and the Official Journal of the American Rhinologic Society and the American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy. International Forum of Allergy Rhinology provides a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and others to publish original research and explore controversies in the medical and surgical treatment of patients with otolaryngic allergy, rhinologic, and skull base conditions. The application of current research to the management of otolaryngic allergy, rhinologic, and skull base diseases and the need for further investigation will be highlighted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信