关于阿特珠单抗/卡铂/依托泊苷治疗日本重症小细胞肺癌安全性的 DPC 数据库研究。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Motohiro Tamiya, Shunichiro Iwasawa, Yusuke Sasaki, Kosei Tajima, Yasutaka Chiba
{"title":"关于阿特珠单抗/卡铂/依托泊苷治疗日本重症小细胞肺癌安全性的 DPC 数据库研究。","authors":"Motohiro Tamiya,&nbsp;Shunichiro Iwasawa,&nbsp;Yusuke Sasaki,&nbsp;Kosei Tajima,&nbsp;Yasutaka Chiba","doi":"10.1007/s12325-024-02905-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Atezolizumab, carboplatin, and etoposide (ACE) therapy is a standard of care for extensive-disease small cell lung cancer (SCLC); however, its safety data are scarce, limiting generalization to the Japanese population.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study aimed to compare the safety of ACE versus carboplatin and etoposide (CE) therapies in Japanese patients using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) database by comparing the incidence of adverse events (AEs). Retrospective data on clinical background and AEs were extracted from the DPC database. Incidence rates and restricted mean survival times (RMSTs) up to 6 months were analyzed for 19 clinically important AEs. Covariates were adjusted using the inverse probability weighting method.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 330,774 patients were identified using the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision codes, of whom 277 were included in the ACE cohort and 478 in the CE cohort. Among the 19 AEs, the incidence of skin disorder and thyroid dysfunction was significantly higher in the ACE cohort compared with the CE cohort. The adjusted incidence rate ratios were 2.38 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04–5.43) for skin disorder and 6.92 (95% CI 2.00–23.89) for thyroid dysfunction. The adjusted RMST differences were − 8.2 days (95% CI − 16.0 to − 0.4 days) for skin disorder and − 8.8 days (95% CI − 15.7 to − 1.9 days) for thyroid dysfunction.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study provides evidence regarding the safety of ACE combination therapy in Japanese clinical practice using the DPC database, with results comparable to those reported in pivotal clinical trials.</p><h3>Trial Registration</h3><p>UMIN Clinical Trials Registry ID UMIN000041508.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11349850/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A DPC Database Study on the Safety of Atezolizumab/Carboplatin/Etoposide in Extensive-Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer in Japanese Patients\",\"authors\":\"Motohiro Tamiya,&nbsp;Shunichiro Iwasawa,&nbsp;Yusuke Sasaki,&nbsp;Kosei Tajima,&nbsp;Yasutaka Chiba\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12325-024-02905-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Atezolizumab, carboplatin, and etoposide (ACE) therapy is a standard of care for extensive-disease small cell lung cancer (SCLC); however, its safety data are scarce, limiting generalization to the Japanese population.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study aimed to compare the safety of ACE versus carboplatin and etoposide (CE) therapies in Japanese patients using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) database by comparing the incidence of adverse events (AEs). Retrospective data on clinical background and AEs were extracted from the DPC database. Incidence rates and restricted mean survival times (RMSTs) up to 6 months were analyzed for 19 clinically important AEs. Covariates were adjusted using the inverse probability weighting method.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 330,774 patients were identified using the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision codes, of whom 277 were included in the ACE cohort and 478 in the CE cohort. Among the 19 AEs, the incidence of skin disorder and thyroid dysfunction was significantly higher in the ACE cohort compared with the CE cohort. The adjusted incidence rate ratios were 2.38 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04–5.43) for skin disorder and 6.92 (95% CI 2.00–23.89) for thyroid dysfunction. The adjusted RMST differences were − 8.2 days (95% CI − 16.0 to − 0.4 days) for skin disorder and − 8.8 days (95% CI − 15.7 to − 1.9 days) for thyroid dysfunction.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study provides evidence regarding the safety of ACE combination therapy in Japanese clinical practice using the DPC database, with results comparable to those reported in pivotal clinical trials.</p><h3>Trial Registration</h3><p>UMIN Clinical Trials Registry ID UMIN000041508.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11349850/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12325-024-02905-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12325-024-02905-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:阿特珠单抗、卡铂和依托泊苷(ACE)疗法是治疗广泛病变小细胞肺癌(SCLC)的标准疗法;然而,其安全性数据很少,限制了在日本人群中的推广:本研究旨在利用诊断程序组合(DPC)数据库,通过比较不良事件(AEs)的发生率,比较ACE疗法与卡铂和依托泊苷(CE)疗法在日本患者中的安全性。从 DPC 数据库中提取了有关临床背景和 AEs 的回顾性数据。分析了19种临床重要不良反应的发生率和长达6个月的受限平均生存时间(RMST)。使用反概率加权法对协变量进行了调整:使用《疾病和有关健康问题的国际统计分类》第 10 次修订版代码共确定了 330,774 名患者,其中 277 人被纳入 ACE 队列,478 人被纳入 CE 队列。在19种AE中,ACE队列中皮肤病和甲状腺功能障碍的发病率明显高于CE队列。调整后的发病率比分别为:皮肤病 2.38(95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.04-5.43),甲状腺功能障碍 6.92(95% CI 2.00-23.89)。调整后的RMST差异为:皮肤病-8.2天(95% CI - 16.0至-0.4天),甲状腺功能障碍-8.8天(95% CI - 15.7至-1.9天):这项研究利用DPC数据库为日本临床实践中ACE联合疗法的安全性提供了证据,其结果与关键临床试验报告的结果相当:试验注册:UMIN 临床试验注册编号 UMIN000041508。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A DPC Database Study on the Safety of Atezolizumab/Carboplatin/Etoposide in Extensive-Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer in Japanese Patients

A DPC Database Study on the Safety of Atezolizumab/Carboplatin/Etoposide in Extensive-Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer in Japanese Patients

Introduction

Atezolizumab, carboplatin, and etoposide (ACE) therapy is a standard of care for extensive-disease small cell lung cancer (SCLC); however, its safety data are scarce, limiting generalization to the Japanese population.

Methods

This study aimed to compare the safety of ACE versus carboplatin and etoposide (CE) therapies in Japanese patients using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) database by comparing the incidence of adverse events (AEs). Retrospective data on clinical background and AEs were extracted from the DPC database. Incidence rates and restricted mean survival times (RMSTs) up to 6 months were analyzed for 19 clinically important AEs. Covariates were adjusted using the inverse probability weighting method.

Results

A total of 330,774 patients were identified using the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision codes, of whom 277 were included in the ACE cohort and 478 in the CE cohort. Among the 19 AEs, the incidence of skin disorder and thyroid dysfunction was significantly higher in the ACE cohort compared with the CE cohort. The adjusted incidence rate ratios were 2.38 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04–5.43) for skin disorder and 6.92 (95% CI 2.00–23.89) for thyroid dysfunction. The adjusted RMST differences were − 8.2 days (95% CI − 16.0 to − 0.4 days) for skin disorder and − 8.8 days (95% CI − 15.7 to − 1.9 days) for thyroid dysfunction.

Conclusions

This study provides evidence regarding the safety of ACE combination therapy in Japanese clinical practice using the DPC database, with results comparable to those reported in pivotal clinical trials.

Trial Registration

UMIN Clinical Trials Registry ID UMIN000041508.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Therapy
Advances in Therapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
353
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信