改进对注射吸毒者自杀风险的评估和管理:在悉尼医疗监督注射中心开展的一项混合方法研究。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Kate Hocknull, Brennan Geiger, Mark Bartlett, Samantha Colledge-Frisby, Fiona Shand, Carolyn A. Day, Marianne Jauncey, Amanda Roxburgh
{"title":"改进对注射吸毒者自杀风险的评估和管理:在悉尼医疗监督注射中心开展的一项混合方法研究。","authors":"Kate Hocknull,&nbsp;Brennan Geiger,&nbsp;Mark Bartlett,&nbsp;Samantha Colledge-Frisby,&nbsp;Fiona Shand,&nbsp;Carolyn A. Day,&nbsp;Marianne Jauncey,&nbsp;Amanda Roxburgh","doi":"10.1111/dar.13900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>People who inject drugs are 13 times more likely to die by suicide than the general population. Guidelines for responding to risk in this population are limited. Harm reduction services attended by people who inject drugs require targeted strategies to address the complexities of suicide risk among this population.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Co-design, engaging health professionals and people with lived experience informed the study. Mixed methods were used to understand the experience of managing suicide risk among clients attending the Medically Supervised Injecting Centre (MSIC) in Sydney. A survey was administered to assess staff confidence in managing risk. Focus groups were conducted with health professionals and MSIC clients to explore experiences of suicide management, response and opportunities for improvement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Half (<i>N</i> = 17) the MSIC staff surveyed reported over 10 years' experience working with this population. Confidence in managing suicide risk was low. Three key themes emerged from focus groups (<i>N</i> = 17): (i) <i>Autonomy</i> and the need to involve clients in the assessment process; (ii) <i>Trust</i> between clients and health professionals, and transparency in decision-making; and (iii) <i>System barriers</i>, described by health professionals as inadequate referral pathways for clients in distress, and by clients as negative experiences of care, including involuntary admission and not receiving medication (e.g. methadone).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion and Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Revised assessment guidelines and a tailored safety plan were developed. These resources are also suitable for other alcohol and other drug services. The challenge in managing suicide risk in harm reduction services is balancing duty of care with staff–client relationships and client engagement.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11318,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol review","volume":"43 6","pages":"1597-1606"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dar.13900","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving assessment and management of suicide risk among people who inject drugs: A mixed methods study conducted at the Medically Supervised Injecting Centre, Sydney\",\"authors\":\"Kate Hocknull,&nbsp;Brennan Geiger,&nbsp;Mark Bartlett,&nbsp;Samantha Colledge-Frisby,&nbsp;Fiona Shand,&nbsp;Carolyn A. Day,&nbsp;Marianne Jauncey,&nbsp;Amanda Roxburgh\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dar.13900\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>People who inject drugs are 13 times more likely to die by suicide than the general population. Guidelines for responding to risk in this population are limited. Harm reduction services attended by people who inject drugs require targeted strategies to address the complexities of suicide risk among this population.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Co-design, engaging health professionals and people with lived experience informed the study. Mixed methods were used to understand the experience of managing suicide risk among clients attending the Medically Supervised Injecting Centre (MSIC) in Sydney. A survey was administered to assess staff confidence in managing risk. Focus groups were conducted with health professionals and MSIC clients to explore experiences of suicide management, response and opportunities for improvement.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Half (<i>N</i> = 17) the MSIC staff surveyed reported over 10 years' experience working with this population. Confidence in managing suicide risk was low. Three key themes emerged from focus groups (<i>N</i> = 17): (i) <i>Autonomy</i> and the need to involve clients in the assessment process; (ii) <i>Trust</i> between clients and health professionals, and transparency in decision-making; and (iii) <i>System barriers</i>, described by health professionals as inadequate referral pathways for clients in distress, and by clients as negative experiences of care, including involuntary admission and not receiving medication (e.g. methadone).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion and Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Revised assessment guidelines and a tailored safety plan were developed. These resources are also suitable for other alcohol and other drug services. The challenge in managing suicide risk in harm reduction services is balancing duty of care with staff–client relationships and client engagement.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug and alcohol review\",\"volume\":\"43 6\",\"pages\":\"1597-1606\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dar.13900\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug and alcohol review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dar.13900\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dar.13900","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:注射吸毒者死于自杀的几率是普通人群的 13 倍。应对这一人群自杀风险的指南非常有限。有注射吸毒者参加的减低伤害服务需要有针对性的策略,以应对这一人群中复杂的自杀风险:方法:共同设计,让医疗专业人员和有生活经验的人参与到研究中来。研究采用了混合方法,以了解悉尼医疗监督注射中心(MSIC)服务对象在管理自杀风险方面的经验。我们进行了一项调查,以评估工作人员在管理风险方面的信心。与医护人员和悉尼医疗监管注射中心的客户进行了焦点小组讨论,以探讨自杀管理经验、应对措施和改进机会:接受调查的半数(N = 17)澳门医务人员信息中心工作人员表示,他们有超过 10 年的工作经验。对管理自杀风险的信心不足。焦点小组(17 人)提出了三个关键主题:(i) 自主性以及让患者参与评估过程的必要性;(ii) 患者与医护人员之间的信任,以及决策的透明度;(iii) 系统障碍,医护人员将其描述为转介陷入困境的患者的途径不足,而患者则将其描述为护理方面的负面经历,包括非自愿入院和未接受药物治疗(如美沙酮):讨论和结论:制定了经修订的评估指南和量身定制的安全计划。这些资源也适用于其他酒精和其他药物服务。在减低伤害服务中管理自杀风险的挑战在于平衡照顾责任、员工与客户的关系以及客户的参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Improving assessment and management of suicide risk among people who inject drugs: A mixed methods study conducted at the Medically Supervised Injecting Centre, Sydney

Improving assessment and management of suicide risk among people who inject drugs: A mixed methods study conducted at the Medically Supervised Injecting Centre, Sydney

Introduction

People who inject drugs are 13 times more likely to die by suicide than the general population. Guidelines for responding to risk in this population are limited. Harm reduction services attended by people who inject drugs require targeted strategies to address the complexities of suicide risk among this population.

Methods

Co-design, engaging health professionals and people with lived experience informed the study. Mixed methods were used to understand the experience of managing suicide risk among clients attending the Medically Supervised Injecting Centre (MSIC) in Sydney. A survey was administered to assess staff confidence in managing risk. Focus groups were conducted with health professionals and MSIC clients to explore experiences of suicide management, response and opportunities for improvement.

Results

Half (N = 17) the MSIC staff surveyed reported over 10 years' experience working with this population. Confidence in managing suicide risk was low. Three key themes emerged from focus groups (N = 17): (i) Autonomy and the need to involve clients in the assessment process; (ii) Trust between clients and health professionals, and transparency in decision-making; and (iii) System barriers, described by health professionals as inadequate referral pathways for clients in distress, and by clients as negative experiences of care, including involuntary admission and not receiving medication (e.g. methadone).

Discussion and Conclusions

Revised assessment guidelines and a tailored safety plan were developed. These resources are also suitable for other alcohol and other drug services. The challenge in managing suicide risk in harm reduction services is balancing duty of care with staff–client relationships and client engagement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol review
Drug and alcohol review SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
151
期刊介绍: Drug and Alcohol Review is an international meeting ground for the views, expertise and experience of all those involved in studying alcohol, tobacco and drug problems. Contributors to the Journal examine and report on alcohol and drug use from a wide range of clinical, biomedical, epidemiological, psychological and sociological perspectives. Drug and Alcohol Review particularly encourages the submission of papers which have a harm reduction perspective. However, all philosophies will find a place in the Journal: the principal criterion for publication of papers is their quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信