Serhat Şibar, Ayhan Işık Erdal, Mert Doruk, Nurullah Gündüz, Mehmet Fatih Özçiler
{"title":"基于术中测量的开放式结构鼻整形术中鼻尖上畸形的处理方法。","authors":"Serhat Şibar, Ayhan Işık Erdal, Mert Doruk, Nurullah Gündüz, Mehmet Fatih Özçiler","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Supratip deformity is one of the most common complications after open rhinoplasty. This study aimed to define a new risk scoring system for supratip deformity and determine the distances that should be left between the tip defining point (TDP) and anterior septal angle (ASA) to prevent it.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four hundred sixty-nine patients who underwent open rhinoplasty between 2018-2022 were included in this retrospective study. The patients were evaluated according to the risk scoring system consisting of four parameters (skin thickness, lower lateral cartilage anatomy, amount of hump resection, and soft tissue procedures). Because of the presence of supratip deformity at the postoperative 12th month, the patients were divided into two groups: (i) without supratip deformity (n = 418) and (ii) with supratip deformity (n = 51). Statistical inferences were made regarding the development of supratip deformity by evaluating the relationship between the risk scores and the intraoperative TDP-ASA distances.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant difference between the groups in risk scores ( P < 0.05). In cases with high-risk scores, it was calculated that the probability of developing supratip deformity decreased significantly when the TDP-ASA distance was above 7.5 mm and increased significantly when the TDP-ASA distance was below 6.5 mm. In cases with low-risk scores, it was found that the probability of developing supratip deformity was reduced considerably when the TDP-ASA distance was over 6.0 mm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The authors recommend keeping the TDP-ASA distance above 6.0 mm in low-risk patients and 7.5 mm in high-risk patients to avoid supratip deformity.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intraoperative Measurement-Based Approach to Supratip Deformity in Open Structural Rhinoplasty.\",\"authors\":\"Serhat Şibar, Ayhan Işık Erdal, Mert Doruk, Nurullah Gündüz, Mehmet Fatih Özçiler\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Supratip deformity is one of the most common complications after open rhinoplasty. This study aimed to define a new risk scoring system for supratip deformity and determine the distances that should be left between the tip defining point (TDP) and anterior septal angle (ASA) to prevent it.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four hundred sixty-nine patients who underwent open rhinoplasty between 2018-2022 were included in this retrospective study. The patients were evaluated according to the risk scoring system consisting of four parameters (skin thickness, lower lateral cartilage anatomy, amount of hump resection, and soft tissue procedures). Because of the presence of supratip deformity at the postoperative 12th month, the patients were divided into two groups: (i) without supratip deformity (n = 418) and (ii) with supratip deformity (n = 51). Statistical inferences were made regarding the development of supratip deformity by evaluating the relationship between the risk scores and the intraoperative TDP-ASA distances.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant difference between the groups in risk scores ( P < 0.05). In cases with high-risk scores, it was calculated that the probability of developing supratip deformity decreased significantly when the TDP-ASA distance was above 7.5 mm and increased significantly when the TDP-ASA distance was below 6.5 mm. In cases with low-risk scores, it was found that the probability of developing supratip deformity was reduced considerably when the TDP-ASA distance was over 6.0 mm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The authors recommend keeping the TDP-ASA distance above 6.0 mm in low-risk patients and 7.5 mm in high-risk patients to avoid supratip deformity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004049\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004049","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:鼻尖上畸形是开放式鼻整形术后最常见的并发症之一。本研究旨在定义一种新的鼻尖上畸形风险评分系统,并确定鼻尖定义点(TDP)和鼻中隔前角(ASA)之间应留出的距离,以预防鼻尖上畸形的发生:这项回顾性研究纳入了2018-2022年间接受开放式鼻整形术的469例患者。根据由四个参数(皮肤厚度、下外侧软骨解剖、驼峰切除量和软组织手术)组成的风险评分系统对患者进行评估。由于患者在术后第12个月出现上唇畸形,因此将患者分为两组:(i) 无上唇畸形组(n = 418)和(ii) 有上唇畸形组(n = 51)。通过评估风险评分与术中 TDP-ASA 距离之间的关系,对臀上畸形的发生进行统计推断:各组之间的风险评分差异明显(P<0.05)。根据计算,在高风险评分的病例中,当 TDP-ASA 距离超过 7.5 mm 时,发生唇上畸形的概率明显降低,而当 TDP-ASA 距离低于 6.5 mm 时,发生唇上畸形的概率明显增加。在低风险评分的病例中,发现当 TDP-ASA 距离超过 6.0 mm 时,发生唇上畸形的概率大大降低:作者建议将低风险患者的 TDP-ASA 距离保持在 6.0 毫米以上,高风险患者保持在 7.5 毫米以上,以避免唇上畸形。
Intraoperative Measurement-Based Approach to Supratip Deformity in Open Structural Rhinoplasty.
Background: Supratip deformity is one of the most common complications after open rhinoplasty. This study aimed to define a new risk scoring system for supratip deformity and determine the distances that should be left between the tip defining point (TDP) and anterior septal angle (ASA) to prevent it.
Methods: Four hundred sixty-nine patients who underwent open rhinoplasty between 2018-2022 were included in this retrospective study. The patients were evaluated according to the risk scoring system consisting of four parameters (skin thickness, lower lateral cartilage anatomy, amount of hump resection, and soft tissue procedures). Because of the presence of supratip deformity at the postoperative 12th month, the patients were divided into two groups: (i) without supratip deformity (n = 418) and (ii) with supratip deformity (n = 51). Statistical inferences were made regarding the development of supratip deformity by evaluating the relationship between the risk scores and the intraoperative TDP-ASA distances.
Results: There was a significant difference between the groups in risk scores ( P < 0.05). In cases with high-risk scores, it was calculated that the probability of developing supratip deformity decreased significantly when the TDP-ASA distance was above 7.5 mm and increased significantly when the TDP-ASA distance was below 6.5 mm. In cases with low-risk scores, it was found that the probability of developing supratip deformity was reduced considerably when the TDP-ASA distance was over 6.0 mm.
Conclusions: The authors recommend keeping the TDP-ASA distance above 6.0 mm in low-risk patients and 7.5 mm in high-risk patients to avoid supratip deformity.
期刊介绍:
The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.