[手部开放性骨折:在紧急情况下,除了确定性骨合成治疗外,是否别无选择?]

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
Daniel Vergote, Martin Mentzel, Simon Bauknecht, Richard-Tobias Moeller
{"title":"[手部开放性骨折:在紧急情况下,除了确定性骨合成治疗外,是否别无选择?]","authors":"Daniel Vergote, Martin Mentzel, Simon Bauknecht, Richard-Tobias Moeller","doi":"10.1055/a-2335-2328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is an emergency indication for the treatment of open fractures. Fracture stabilisation and soft tissue care are equal prerequisites for an uncomplicated course of treatment and a good functional result. However, challenges arise in cases of extensive wound contamination and compromised perfusion, limiting options for stable osteosynthesis in emergency situations. Furthermore, resource constraints may pose a challenge to adhering strictly to the six-hour time window. This prompts deliberations on whether, under certain circumstances, a deviation from the conventional approach is feasible by exploring the possibility of prioritising immediate surgical wound care during emergencies, with definitive fracture care deferred to a later point in time. Between 2019 and 2021, 301 patients with open fractures of the hand skeleton were treated (median age 44 years, 85% male, 15% female). Definitive treatment was carried out as a primary emergency procedure in 215 patients (group A), whereas it was performed at an interval after an average of 3 days in 86 patients (group B), who had received surgical wound care, splint placement, and antibiotic coverage on the day of the injury. In a retrospective study, the following criteria were analysed: comorbidities, injury patterns, injury location, timing of treatment, number of follow-up procedures, infection rate, and duration of hospitalisation. The course was complicated by infection in six patients (1.9%). Five of these patients were in group A (infection rate 2.3%), and only one patient was in group B (infection rate 1.1%). All six infections occurred after crush injuries, all at the fingertip or end joint. These numbers underscore the relevance of soft tissue trauma and primary stump formation. Comorbidities were not statistically significant in our study with a view to the occurrence of infection. In conclusion, it can be stated that, with antibiotic protection, definitive treatment of an open fracture in an interval is possible if it is preceded by initial emergency surgical wound care with subsequent immobilisation.</p>","PeriodicalId":55075,"journal":{"name":"Handchirurgie Mikrochirurgie Plastische Chirurgie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Open Fractures of the Hand: is there No Alternative to Definitive Osteosynthetic Treatment in an Emergency Situation?]\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Vergote, Martin Mentzel, Simon Bauknecht, Richard-Tobias Moeller\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2335-2328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There is an emergency indication for the treatment of open fractures. Fracture stabilisation and soft tissue care are equal prerequisites for an uncomplicated course of treatment and a good functional result. However, challenges arise in cases of extensive wound contamination and compromised perfusion, limiting options for stable osteosynthesis in emergency situations. Furthermore, resource constraints may pose a challenge to adhering strictly to the six-hour time window. This prompts deliberations on whether, under certain circumstances, a deviation from the conventional approach is feasible by exploring the possibility of prioritising immediate surgical wound care during emergencies, with definitive fracture care deferred to a later point in time. Between 2019 and 2021, 301 patients with open fractures of the hand skeleton were treated (median age 44 years, 85% male, 15% female). Definitive treatment was carried out as a primary emergency procedure in 215 patients (group A), whereas it was performed at an interval after an average of 3 days in 86 patients (group B), who had received surgical wound care, splint placement, and antibiotic coverage on the day of the injury. In a retrospective study, the following criteria were analysed: comorbidities, injury patterns, injury location, timing of treatment, number of follow-up procedures, infection rate, and duration of hospitalisation. The course was complicated by infection in six patients (1.9%). Five of these patients were in group A (infection rate 2.3%), and only one patient was in group B (infection rate 1.1%). All six infections occurred after crush injuries, all at the fingertip or end joint. These numbers underscore the relevance of soft tissue trauma and primary stump formation. Comorbidities were not statistically significant in our study with a view to the occurrence of infection. In conclusion, it can be stated that, with antibiotic protection, definitive treatment of an open fracture in an interval is possible if it is preceded by initial emergency surgical wound care with subsequent immobilisation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Handchirurgie Mikrochirurgie Plastische Chirurgie\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Handchirurgie Mikrochirurgie Plastische Chirurgie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2335-2328\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Handchirurgie Mikrochirurgie Plastische Chirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2335-2328","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

治疗开放性骨折有紧急指征。稳定骨折和软组织护理是治疗过程不复杂和取得良好功能效果的前提条件。然而,在伤口大面积污染和灌注受损的情况下就会出现挑战,从而限制了在紧急情况下进行稳定骨合成的选择。此外,资源限制也可能对严格遵守六小时的时间窗口构成挑战。这就促使人们思考,在某些情况下,是否可以偏离常规方法,探索在紧急情况下优先考虑立即进行手术伤口护理,而将明确的骨折护理推迟到稍后时间点的可能性。2019年至2021年期间,共有301名手部骨骼开放性骨折患者接受了治疗(中位年龄44岁,85%为男性,15%为女性)。215名患者(A组)的最终治疗是作为初级急诊手术进行的,而86名患者(B组)的最终治疗是在平均3天后进行的,这些患者在受伤当天接受了手术伤口护理、夹板固定和抗生素治疗。在一项回顾性研究中,对以下标准进行了分析:合并症、受伤模式、受伤部位、治疗时机、随访次数、感染率和住院时间。有六名患者(1.9%)的治疗过程因感染而变得复杂。其中五名患者属于 A 组(感染率为 2.3%),只有一名患者属于 B 组(感染率为 1.1%)。所有六例感染均发生在挤压伤之后,且均发生在指尖或末端关节处。这些数字强调了软组织创伤和原发性残端形成的相关性。在我们的研究中,并发症对感染的发生没有统计学意义。总之,在抗生素的保护下,如果在间歇期对开放性骨折进行初步的紧急手术伤口护理,并在随后进行固定,是可以对其进行最终治疗的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Open Fractures of the Hand: is there No Alternative to Definitive Osteosynthetic Treatment in an Emergency Situation?]

There is an emergency indication for the treatment of open fractures. Fracture stabilisation and soft tissue care are equal prerequisites for an uncomplicated course of treatment and a good functional result. However, challenges arise in cases of extensive wound contamination and compromised perfusion, limiting options for stable osteosynthesis in emergency situations. Furthermore, resource constraints may pose a challenge to adhering strictly to the six-hour time window. This prompts deliberations on whether, under certain circumstances, a deviation from the conventional approach is feasible by exploring the possibility of prioritising immediate surgical wound care during emergencies, with definitive fracture care deferred to a later point in time. Between 2019 and 2021, 301 patients with open fractures of the hand skeleton were treated (median age 44 years, 85% male, 15% female). Definitive treatment was carried out as a primary emergency procedure in 215 patients (group A), whereas it was performed at an interval after an average of 3 days in 86 patients (group B), who had received surgical wound care, splint placement, and antibiotic coverage on the day of the injury. In a retrospective study, the following criteria were analysed: comorbidities, injury patterns, injury location, timing of treatment, number of follow-up procedures, infection rate, and duration of hospitalisation. The course was complicated by infection in six patients (1.9%). Five of these patients were in group A (infection rate 2.3%), and only one patient was in group B (infection rate 1.1%). All six infections occurred after crush injuries, all at the fingertip or end joint. These numbers underscore the relevance of soft tissue trauma and primary stump formation. Comorbidities were not statistically significant in our study with a view to the occurrence of infection. In conclusion, it can be stated that, with antibiotic protection, definitive treatment of an open fracture in an interval is possible if it is preceded by initial emergency surgical wound care with subsequent immobilisation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In Originalarbeiten und Fallberichten finden Sie die neuesten Informationen über: Diagnostik Verfahrenswahl state of the art / neueste Techniken rekonstruktive Verfahren Behandlung infolge von Traumata oder OP Bewertung der Ergebnisse Klinische Forschung Interessante Darstellung der neuesten Erkenntnisse in Originalarbeiten und Fallberichten. Exzellent veranschaulicht durch ein klares Layout und reiche Bebilderung. Überzeugen Sie sich selbst! Organschaften Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Handchirurgie, Deutschen Gesellschaft für Handchirurgie und Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Handchirurgie Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Mikrochirurgie der peripheren Nerven und Gefäße Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft der Plastischen, Rekonstruktiven und Ästhetischen Chirurgen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信