酶法清创与标准烧伤护理的经济分析:回顾性分析。

Annals of burns and fire disasters Pub Date : 2024-06-30 eCollection Date: 2024-06-01
J Minic, M Vestita, E Vigato, E Dallapozza, Y Shoham, U Lavagnolo, F P Bianchi, A Fratucello, M Governa
{"title":"酶法清创与标准烧伤护理的经济分析:回顾性分析。","authors":"J Minic, M Vestita, E Vigato, E Dallapozza, Y Shoham, U Lavagnolo, F P Bianchi, A Fratucello, M Governa","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When compared to standard surgical management, rapid enzymatic debridement of deep burns reduces the need for surgery while achieving similar long-term results. However, few studies have directly compared the costs of standard surgical and enzymatic burn care. We conducted a study comparing the care costs of 44 adult burn patients treated before (n=22) and after (n=22) introducing rapid bromelain-based enzymatic debridement (BED) of deep burns. Mean age was 59 years, 54% were male, and mean total body surface area (TBSA) was 23.5%. Burn etiology included flame and scalding burns (8). Groups treated with standard of care and enzymatic debridement were comparable in terms of age, sex and TBSA. Burn management with BED significantly reduced total debridement costs as well as grand total costs when compared with traditional surgical care. Such reduction was mostly related to lower costs associated with reduced surgical care and less facilities and resources consumption in the BED group.</p>","PeriodicalId":93873,"journal":{"name":"Annals of burns and fire disasters","volume":"37 2","pages":"148-158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11225277/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ENZYMATIC DEBRIDEMENT VERSUS STANDARD BURN CARE: A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS.\",\"authors\":\"J Minic, M Vestita, E Vigato, E Dallapozza, Y Shoham, U Lavagnolo, F P Bianchi, A Fratucello, M Governa\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>When compared to standard surgical management, rapid enzymatic debridement of deep burns reduces the need for surgery while achieving similar long-term results. However, few studies have directly compared the costs of standard surgical and enzymatic burn care. We conducted a study comparing the care costs of 44 adult burn patients treated before (n=22) and after (n=22) introducing rapid bromelain-based enzymatic debridement (BED) of deep burns. Mean age was 59 years, 54% were male, and mean total body surface area (TBSA) was 23.5%. Burn etiology included flame and scalding burns (8). Groups treated with standard of care and enzymatic debridement were comparable in terms of age, sex and TBSA. Burn management with BED significantly reduced total debridement costs as well as grand total costs when compared with traditional surgical care. Such reduction was mostly related to lower costs associated with reduced surgical care and less facilities and resources consumption in the BED group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of burns and fire disasters\",\"volume\":\"37 2\",\"pages\":\"148-158\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11225277/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of burns and fire disasters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of burns and fire disasters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与标准的手术治疗相比,深度烧伤的快速酶解清创可减少手术需求,同时获得相似的长期效果。然而,很少有研究直接比较标准手术和酶解烧伤护理的成本。我们进行了一项研究,比较了 44 名成年烧伤患者在采用基于溴菠萝蛋白酶的深度烧伤快速清创术(BED)之前(22 人)和之后(22 人)的护理成本。平均年龄为 59 岁,54% 为男性,平均体表总面积 (TBSA) 为 23.5%。烧伤病因包括火焰烧伤和烫伤(8)。在年龄、性别和总体表面积方面,接受标准护理和酶清创治疗的组别具有可比性。与传统手术治疗相比,采用 BED 治疗烧伤可大大降低清创总成本和总费用。这种降低主要与 BED 组手术护理减少、设施和资源消耗减少有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ENZYMATIC DEBRIDEMENT VERSUS STANDARD BURN CARE: A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS.

When compared to standard surgical management, rapid enzymatic debridement of deep burns reduces the need for surgery while achieving similar long-term results. However, few studies have directly compared the costs of standard surgical and enzymatic burn care. We conducted a study comparing the care costs of 44 adult burn patients treated before (n=22) and after (n=22) introducing rapid bromelain-based enzymatic debridement (BED) of deep burns. Mean age was 59 years, 54% were male, and mean total body surface area (TBSA) was 23.5%. Burn etiology included flame and scalding burns (8). Groups treated with standard of care and enzymatic debridement were comparable in terms of age, sex and TBSA. Burn management with BED significantly reduced total debridement costs as well as grand total costs when compared with traditional surgical care. Such reduction was mostly related to lower costs associated with reduced surgical care and less facilities and resources consumption in the BED group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信