骨转移对晚期肾细胞癌患者全身治疗反应的影响:系统性文献综述。

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Janet Brown , Daniele Santini , Natalie Charnley , Alessia Ogareva , Alison Chisholm , Robert Jones
{"title":"骨转移对晚期肾细胞癌患者全身治疗反应的影响:系统性文献综述。","authors":"Janet Brown ,&nbsp;Daniele Santini ,&nbsp;Natalie Charnley ,&nbsp;Alessia Ogareva ,&nbsp;Alison Chisholm ,&nbsp;Robert Jones","doi":"10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Bone metastases negatively affect prognosis in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). We conducted a systematic literature review to identify clinical trial publications including patients with aRCC with and without bone metastases.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‑Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022355436). MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched (September 2, 2022) to identify publications reporting efficacy and safety outcomes for patients with/without bone metastasis from clinical trials of systemic RCC therapies. Risk of bias was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 526 publications screened, 19 were eligible: seven (from five studies) reported phase 3 trials, six reported phase 2 trials, one reported phase 1b/2 trials, and five were pooled analyses. Five publications reported moderate-quality evidence, while 14 were graded as low- or very low-quality evidence, suggesting a high potential for uncertainty. Five studies reported benefits of investigational therapies versus comparators in patients with and without bone metastases; these studies included cabozantinib, nivolumab, cabozantinib plus nivolumab, and lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab treatment arms. Data were also available for nivolumab plus ipilimumab. Bone metastases were consistently associated with poor prognosis in patients with aRCC. Preliminary data support the hypothesis that therapies targeting pathways implicated in the development of bone metastases may be beneficial, and warrant further investigation. However, data to support treatment decision-making are lacking.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings highlight the need for clinical data to assist in defining the optimal treatment for patients with aRCC and bone metastasis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9537,"journal":{"name":"Cancer treatment reviews","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 102792"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305737224001208/pdfft?md5=a1bea8e56da6649d0b21f2879b6546af&pid=1-s2.0-S0305737224001208-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implications of bone metastasis on response to systemic therapy in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: A systematic literature review\",\"authors\":\"Janet Brown ,&nbsp;Daniele Santini ,&nbsp;Natalie Charnley ,&nbsp;Alessia Ogareva ,&nbsp;Alison Chisholm ,&nbsp;Robert Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102792\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Bone metastases negatively affect prognosis in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). We conducted a systematic literature review to identify clinical trial publications including patients with aRCC with and without bone metastases.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‑Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022355436). MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched (September 2, 2022) to identify publications reporting efficacy and safety outcomes for patients with/without bone metastasis from clinical trials of systemic RCC therapies. Risk of bias was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 526 publications screened, 19 were eligible: seven (from five studies) reported phase 3 trials, six reported phase 2 trials, one reported phase 1b/2 trials, and five were pooled analyses. Five publications reported moderate-quality evidence, while 14 were graded as low- or very low-quality evidence, suggesting a high potential for uncertainty. Five studies reported benefits of investigational therapies versus comparators in patients with and without bone metastases; these studies included cabozantinib, nivolumab, cabozantinib plus nivolumab, and lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab treatment arms. Data were also available for nivolumab plus ipilimumab. Bone metastases were consistently associated with poor prognosis in patients with aRCC. Preliminary data support the hypothesis that therapies targeting pathways implicated in the development of bone metastases may be beneficial, and warrant further investigation. However, data to support treatment decision-making are lacking.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings highlight the need for clinical data to assist in defining the optimal treatment for patients with aRCC and bone metastasis.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer treatment reviews\",\"volume\":\"129 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102792\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305737224001208/pdfft?md5=a1bea8e56da6649d0b21f2879b6546af&pid=1-s2.0-S0305737224001208-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer treatment reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305737224001208\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer treatment reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305737224001208","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:骨转移对晚期肾细胞癌(aRCC)患者的预后有负面影响。我们进行了一项系统性文献综述,以确定包括有骨转移和无骨转移的 aRCC 患者在内的临床试验出版物:综述根据系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行,并在 PROSPERO(CRD42022355436)上进行了注册。检索了MEDLINE和Embase数据库(2022年9月2日),以确定从全身性RCC疗法临床试验中报告骨转移患者/无骨转移患者疗效和安全性结果的出版物。采用建议评估、发展和评价分级法(GRADE)对偏倚风险进行评估:在筛选出的 526 篇出版物中,有 19 篇符合条件:其中 7 篇(来自 5 项研究)报告了 3 期试验,6 篇报告了 2 期试验,1 篇报告了 1b/2 期试验,5 篇为汇总分析。5篇文献报告了中等质量的证据,14篇被评为低质量或极低质量的证据,这表明不确定性的可能性很高。五项研究报告了在有骨转移和无骨转移患者中研究性疗法相对于比较者的优势;这些研究包括卡博替尼、nivolumab、卡博替尼加nivolumab和lenvatinib加pembrolizumab治疗组。此外,还提供了nivolumab加伊匹单抗的数据。骨转移一直与 aRCC 患者的不良预后有关。初步数据支持这样的假设,即针对与骨转移发生有关的通路的疗法可能是有益的,值得进一步研究。然而,目前还缺乏支持治疗决策的数据:我们的研究结果凸显了临床数据的必要性,这些数据有助于确定对骨转移癌患者的最佳治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Implications of bone metastasis on response to systemic therapy in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: A systematic literature review

Implications of bone metastasis on response to systemic therapy in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: A systematic literature review

Introduction

Bone metastases negatively affect prognosis in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). We conducted a systematic literature review to identify clinical trial publications including patients with aRCC with and without bone metastases.

Methods

The review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‑Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022355436). MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched (September 2, 2022) to identify publications reporting efficacy and safety outcomes for patients with/without bone metastasis from clinical trials of systemic RCC therapies. Risk of bias was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).

Results

Of 526 publications screened, 19 were eligible: seven (from five studies) reported phase 3 trials, six reported phase 2 trials, one reported phase 1b/2 trials, and five were pooled analyses. Five publications reported moderate-quality evidence, while 14 were graded as low- or very low-quality evidence, suggesting a high potential for uncertainty. Five studies reported benefits of investigational therapies versus comparators in patients with and without bone metastases; these studies included cabozantinib, nivolumab, cabozantinib plus nivolumab, and lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab treatment arms. Data were also available for nivolumab plus ipilimumab. Bone metastases were consistently associated with poor prognosis in patients with aRCC. Preliminary data support the hypothesis that therapies targeting pathways implicated in the development of bone metastases may be beneficial, and warrant further investigation. However, data to support treatment decision-making are lacking.

Conclusion

Our findings highlight the need for clinical data to assist in defining the optimal treatment for patients with aRCC and bone metastasis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer treatment reviews
Cancer treatment reviews 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
21.40
自引率
0.80%
发文量
109
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Cancer Treatment Reviews Journal Overview: International journal focused on developments in cancer treatment research Publishes state-of-the-art, authoritative reviews to keep clinicians and researchers informed Regular Sections in Each Issue: Comments on Controversy Tumor Reviews Anti-tumor Treatments New Drugs Complications of Treatment General and Supportive Care Laboratory/Clinic Interface Submission and Editorial System: Online submission and editorial system for Cancer Treatment Reviews
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信