心力衰竭患者的家庭物理治疗前置:多中心随机对照试验。

Q3 Nursing
Home healthcare now Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-08 DOI:10.1097/NHH.0000000000001267
Konrad J Dias, Jeffrey Child, Mary T Blackinton, Stanley Wilson, Dustin R Brown, Sean M Collins
{"title":"心力衰竭患者的家庭物理治疗前置:多中心随机对照试验。","authors":"Konrad J Dias, Jeffrey Child, Mary T Blackinton, Stanley Wilson, Dustin R Brown, Sean M Collins","doi":"10.1097/NHH.0000000000001267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Frontloading home care visits has been found to be effective in the nursing profession but has not been investigated in physical therapy (PT) practice. This study aimed to examine the impact of frontloading home PT visits on function in persons with heart failure (HF). This was a prospective multi-center randomized controlled trial with blinded raters. A total of 82 ambulatory patients with a primary diagnosis of HF discharged from an acute care facility to home care participated in the study. Subjects were randomly allocated to an experimental frontloaded group (FLG) or control group (CG) for 4 weeks. FLG visit frequencies were five sessions per week for 2 weeks, and three sessions per week for 2 weeks. The CG received two sessions per week for 4 weeks. Functional measures including the 2-minute step test (2MST), 2-minute walk test (2MWT), gait speed (GS), Timed Up and Go (TUG), and 30-second chair rise test (30-CRT) were collected at the onset of care, at the end of 2 weeks and 4 weeks. The groups were statistically similar at baseline for all measures. All subjects significantly improved scores in all functional measures over time, within-subject main effect (p < .01). Significant between-subject effects were noted for 30-CRT (p = .04). Interaction effects were noted for GS (p = .03) and TUG test (p = .02). This is the first study to report meaningful improvements in function in individuals with HF. Significant treatment effect differences between the FLG and CG were found for GS, TUG, and 30-CRT. Future studies should examine the use of a standardized intervention to validate the effectiveness of frontloading home visits on quality of life and readmission rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":37842,"journal":{"name":"Home healthcare now","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frontloading Home Physical Therapy Visits for Patients With Heart Failure: A Multi-center Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Konrad J Dias, Jeffrey Child, Mary T Blackinton, Stanley Wilson, Dustin R Brown, Sean M Collins\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/NHH.0000000000001267\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Frontloading home care visits has been found to be effective in the nursing profession but has not been investigated in physical therapy (PT) practice. This study aimed to examine the impact of frontloading home PT visits on function in persons with heart failure (HF). This was a prospective multi-center randomized controlled trial with blinded raters. A total of 82 ambulatory patients with a primary diagnosis of HF discharged from an acute care facility to home care participated in the study. Subjects were randomly allocated to an experimental frontloaded group (FLG) or control group (CG) for 4 weeks. FLG visit frequencies were five sessions per week for 2 weeks, and three sessions per week for 2 weeks. The CG received two sessions per week for 4 weeks. Functional measures including the 2-minute step test (2MST), 2-minute walk test (2MWT), gait speed (GS), Timed Up and Go (TUG), and 30-second chair rise test (30-CRT) were collected at the onset of care, at the end of 2 weeks and 4 weeks. The groups were statistically similar at baseline for all measures. All subjects significantly improved scores in all functional measures over time, within-subject main effect (p < .01). Significant between-subject effects were noted for 30-CRT (p = .04). Interaction effects were noted for GS (p = .03) and TUG test (p = .02). This is the first study to report meaningful improvements in function in individuals with HF. Significant treatment effect differences between the FLG and CG were found for GS, TUG, and 30-CRT. Future studies should examine the use of a standardized intervention to validate the effectiveness of frontloading home visits on quality of life and readmission rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Home healthcare now\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Home healthcare now\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/NHH.0000000000001267\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Home healthcare now","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NHH.0000000000001267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在护理专业中,前置家庭护理访视被认为是有效的,但在物理治疗(PT)实践中还没有进行过调查。本研究旨在探讨前置式家庭物理治疗访视对心力衰竭(HF)患者功能的影响。这是一项前瞻性多中心随机对照试验,评定者均为盲人。共有82名主要诊断为心力衰竭的非卧床患者参加了这项研究。受试者被随机分配到实验前置组(FLG)或对照组(CG),为期 4 周。FLG访问频率为每周5次,持续2周;CG访问频率为每周3次,持续2周。对照组在 4 周内每周接受两次治疗。在护理开始时、2 周结束时和 4 周结束时,收集功能测量数据,包括 2 分钟台阶测试 (2MST)、2 分钟步行测试 (2MWT)、步态速度 (GS)、定时起立行走 (TUG) 和 30 秒起坐测试 (30-CRT)。从统计学角度来看,各组在所有测量指标的基线上都很相似。随着时间的推移,所有受试者在所有功能测量中的得分都有明显提高,受试者内主效应(P < .01)。30-CRT 具有显著的受试者间效应(p = .04)。GS (p = .03) 和 TUG 测试 (p = .02) 存在交互效应。这是第一项对心房颤动患者的功能改善进行有意义报告的研究。在GS、TUG和30-CRT方面,FLG和CG之间存在显著的治疗效果差异。未来的研究应检查标准化干预措施的使用情况,以验证前置家访对生活质量和再入院率的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Frontloading Home Physical Therapy Visits for Patients With Heart Failure: A Multi-center Randomized Controlled Trial.

Frontloading home care visits has been found to be effective in the nursing profession but has not been investigated in physical therapy (PT) practice. This study aimed to examine the impact of frontloading home PT visits on function in persons with heart failure (HF). This was a prospective multi-center randomized controlled trial with blinded raters. A total of 82 ambulatory patients with a primary diagnosis of HF discharged from an acute care facility to home care participated in the study. Subjects were randomly allocated to an experimental frontloaded group (FLG) or control group (CG) for 4 weeks. FLG visit frequencies were five sessions per week for 2 weeks, and three sessions per week for 2 weeks. The CG received two sessions per week for 4 weeks. Functional measures including the 2-minute step test (2MST), 2-minute walk test (2MWT), gait speed (GS), Timed Up and Go (TUG), and 30-second chair rise test (30-CRT) were collected at the onset of care, at the end of 2 weeks and 4 weeks. The groups were statistically similar at baseline for all measures. All subjects significantly improved scores in all functional measures over time, within-subject main effect (p < .01). Significant between-subject effects were noted for 30-CRT (p = .04). Interaction effects were noted for GS (p = .03) and TUG test (p = .02). This is the first study to report meaningful improvements in function in individuals with HF. Significant treatment effect differences between the FLG and CG were found for GS, TUG, and 30-CRT. Future studies should examine the use of a standardized intervention to validate the effectiveness of frontloading home visits on quality of life and readmission rates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Home healthcare now
Home healthcare now Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
203
期刊介绍: Home Healthcare Now is the professional, contemporary journal serving the educational and communication needs of home care and hospice nurses. The journal is highly interactive and timely, focusing on the multidimensional, interdisciplinary and specialty practice areas of home care nursing. Clinical, operational, and educational home care nursing issues are the core of the publication; plentiful columns and features focus on practical, up-to-date approaches to everyday situations, as well as analysis and interpretation of how healthcare trends affect the home care nurse''s practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信