丹麦血清阳性和血清阴性类风湿性关节炎的发病率:一项基于全国人口的研究。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-08 DOI:10.1080/03009742.2024.2365540
B G Soussi, R L Cordtz, K Duch, S Kristensen, D Prieto-Alhambra, A Linauskas, C S Bork, E B Schmidt, L Dreyer
{"title":"丹麦血清阳性和血清阴性类风湿性关节炎的发病率:一项基于全国人口的研究。","authors":"B G Soussi, R L Cordtz, K Duch, S Kristensen, D Prieto-Alhambra, A Linauskas, C S Bork, E B Schmidt, L Dreyer","doi":"10.1080/03009742.2024.2365540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate and compare trends in incidence rates (IRs) of seropositive and seronegative rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Denmark using various data sources for serostatus definition.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This nationwide population-based cohort study was based on data from Danish healthcare and clinical quality registries between 2000 and 2018. Information on anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide and immunoglobulin M rheumatoid factor was obtained, and definitions of seropositivity according to the number of applied data sources were prespecified. Annual age- and sex-standardized IRs were calculated as the number of incident seropositive and seronegative cases, divided by the number of person-years (PY) in the general population in that given year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An increasing temporal trend in IR of seropositive RA and a decreasing trend in seronegative RA were observed. The IRs were higher for seropositive RA than for seronegative RA from 2009 onwards, with a widening of the IR gap between 2009 and 2016 regardless of the definition of seropositivity. When combining laboratory- and physician-reported autoantibody information and ICD-10 codes, the IR of seropositive RA in 2018 was approximately twice that of seronegative RA, at 19.0 and 9.0 per 100 000 PY, respectively. The level of antibody testing increased significantly during the study period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The IR of seropositive RA increased over time, whereas the IR of seronegative RA decreased. Temporal IR changes may be caused by a real change in the RA serology subtypes, an increase in autoantibody testing and availability, changes in registration practice over time, or a combination of these factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":21424,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence of seropositive and seronegative rheumatoid arthritis in Denmark: a nationwide population-based study.\",\"authors\":\"B G Soussi, R L Cordtz, K Duch, S Kristensen, D Prieto-Alhambra, A Linauskas, C S Bork, E B Schmidt, L Dreyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03009742.2024.2365540\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate and compare trends in incidence rates (IRs) of seropositive and seronegative rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Denmark using various data sources for serostatus definition.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This nationwide population-based cohort study was based on data from Danish healthcare and clinical quality registries between 2000 and 2018. Information on anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide and immunoglobulin M rheumatoid factor was obtained, and definitions of seropositivity according to the number of applied data sources were prespecified. Annual age- and sex-standardized IRs were calculated as the number of incident seropositive and seronegative cases, divided by the number of person-years (PY) in the general population in that given year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An increasing temporal trend in IR of seropositive RA and a decreasing trend in seronegative RA were observed. The IRs were higher for seropositive RA than for seronegative RA from 2009 onwards, with a widening of the IR gap between 2009 and 2016 regardless of the definition of seropositivity. When combining laboratory- and physician-reported autoantibody information and ICD-10 codes, the IR of seropositive RA in 2018 was approximately twice that of seronegative RA, at 19.0 and 9.0 per 100 000 PY, respectively. The level of antibody testing increased significantly during the study period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The IR of seropositive RA increased over time, whereas the IR of seronegative RA decreased. Temporal IR changes may be caused by a real change in the RA serology subtypes, an increase in autoantibody testing and availability, changes in registration practice over time, or a combination of these factors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03009742.2024.2365540\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03009742.2024.2365540","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的利用各种血清状态定义数据来源,调查和比较丹麦血清阳性和血清阴性类风湿关节炎(RA)发病率(IRs)的趋势:这项基于全国人口的队列研究基于2000年至2018年期间丹麦医疗保健和临床质量登记数据。研究人员获得了抗环瓜氨酸肽和免疫球蛋白M类风湿因子的信息,并根据应用数据源的数量预先确定了血清阳性的定义。年度年龄和性别标准化IR的计算方法是:血清阳性和血清阴性病例数除以特定年份普通人群的人年数(PY):结果:血清反应阳性 RA 的内因子呈上升趋势,血清反应阴性 RA 的内因子呈下降趋势。从2009年起,血清阳性RA的IR高于血清阴性RA,2009年至2016年间,无论血清阳性的定义如何,IR差距都在扩大。如果将实验室和医生报告的自身抗体信息与 ICD-10 编码相结合,2018 年血清阳性 RA 的 IR 约为血清阴性 RA 的两倍,分别为每 10 万 PY 19.0 例和 9.0 例。在研究期间,抗体检测水平明显提高:结论:随着时间的推移,血清阳性RA的IR有所增加,而血清阴性RA的IR有所下降。IR的时间性变化可能是由于RA血清学亚型的实际变化、自身抗体检测和可用性的增加、登记实践随时间的变化或这些因素的综合作用造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Incidence of seropositive and seronegative rheumatoid arthritis in Denmark: a nationwide population-based study.

Objective: To investigate and compare trends in incidence rates (IRs) of seropositive and seronegative rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Denmark using various data sources for serostatus definition.

Method: This nationwide population-based cohort study was based on data from Danish healthcare and clinical quality registries between 2000 and 2018. Information on anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide and immunoglobulin M rheumatoid factor was obtained, and definitions of seropositivity according to the number of applied data sources were prespecified. Annual age- and sex-standardized IRs were calculated as the number of incident seropositive and seronegative cases, divided by the number of person-years (PY) in the general population in that given year.

Results: An increasing temporal trend in IR of seropositive RA and a decreasing trend in seronegative RA were observed. The IRs were higher for seropositive RA than for seronegative RA from 2009 onwards, with a widening of the IR gap between 2009 and 2016 regardless of the definition of seropositivity. When combining laboratory- and physician-reported autoantibody information and ICD-10 codes, the IR of seropositive RA in 2018 was approximately twice that of seronegative RA, at 19.0 and 9.0 per 100 000 PY, respectively. The level of antibody testing increased significantly during the study period.

Conclusions: The IR of seropositive RA increased over time, whereas the IR of seronegative RA decreased. Temporal IR changes may be caused by a real change in the RA serology subtypes, an increase in autoantibody testing and availability, changes in registration practice over time, or a combination of these factors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology is the official journal of the Scandinavian Society for Rheumatology, a non-profit organization following the statutes of the Scandinavian Society for Rheumatology/Scandinavian Research Foundation. The main objective of the Foundation is to support research and promote information and knowledge about rheumatology and related fields. The annual surplus by running the Journal is awarded to young, talented, researchers within the field of rheumatology.pasting The Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology is an international scientific journal covering clinical and experimental aspects of rheumatic diseases. The journal provides essential reading for rheumatologists as well as general practitioners, orthopaedic surgeons, radiologists, pharmacologists, pathologists and other health professionals with an interest in patients with rheumatic diseases. The journal publishes original articles as well as reviews, editorials, letters and supplements within the various fields of clinical and experimental rheumatology, including; Epidemiology Aetiology and pathogenesis Treatment and prophylaxis Laboratory aspects including genetics, biochemistry, immunology, immunopathology, microbiology, histopathology, pathophysiology and pharmacology Radiological aspects including X-ray, ultrasonography, CT, MRI and other forms of imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信