边学坐边伸手:捕捉在家共同发展技能的运动学。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Jana M. Iverson, Emily R. Britsch, Joshua L. Schneider, Samantha N. Plate, Valentina Focaroli, Fabrizio Taffoni, Flavio Keller
{"title":"边学坐边伸手:捕捉在家共同发展技能的运动学。","authors":"Jana M. Iverson,&nbsp;Emily R. Britsch,&nbsp;Joshua L. Schneider,&nbsp;Samantha N. Plate,&nbsp;Valentina Focaroli,&nbsp;Fabrizio Taffoni,&nbsp;Flavio Keller","doi":"10.1002/dev.22527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study examined the co-development of infant reaching and postural control across the transition to arms-free sitting at home. We observed infants with typical likelihood (TL; <i>n</i> = 24) and elevated likelihood (EL; <i>n</i> = 20) for autism at four biweekly sessions spanning the transition to arms-free sitting (infant age = 4.5–8 months at first session). At each session, infants sat on a pressure-sensitive mat with external support or independently, wore magneto-inertial sensors on both wrists, and reached for toys presented at midline. Analyses focused on characterizing and comparing control of sitting during reaching actions and standard kinematic metrics of reaching during Supported versus Independent Sitting. Although EL infants achieved arms-free sitting later than TL peers, there were no group differences on any measures. Across sessions, infants’ control of the sitting posture during concurrent reaching movements improved in both contexts, though they were less stable as they reached when sitting independently compared to when sitting with support. A similar effect was apparent in the kinematics of reaches, with overall improvement over time, but evidence of poorer control in Independent relative to Supported Sitting. Taken together, these findings underscore the mutually influential and dynamic relations between emerging skills and well-established behaviors.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reaching While Learning to Sit: Capturing the Kinematics of Co-Developing Skills at Home\",\"authors\":\"Jana M. Iverson,&nbsp;Emily R. Britsch,&nbsp;Joshua L. Schneider,&nbsp;Samantha N. Plate,&nbsp;Valentina Focaroli,&nbsp;Fabrizio Taffoni,&nbsp;Flavio Keller\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/dev.22527\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>This study examined the co-development of infant reaching and postural control across the transition to arms-free sitting at home. We observed infants with typical likelihood (TL; <i>n</i> = 24) and elevated likelihood (EL; <i>n</i> = 20) for autism at four biweekly sessions spanning the transition to arms-free sitting (infant age = 4.5–8 months at first session). At each session, infants sat on a pressure-sensitive mat with external support or independently, wore magneto-inertial sensors on both wrists, and reached for toys presented at midline. Analyses focused on characterizing and comparing control of sitting during reaching actions and standard kinematic metrics of reaching during Supported versus Independent Sitting. Although EL infants achieved arms-free sitting later than TL peers, there were no group differences on any measures. Across sessions, infants’ control of the sitting posture during concurrent reaching movements improved in both contexts, though they were less stable as they reached when sitting independently compared to when sitting with support. A similar effect was apparent in the kinematics of reaches, with overall improvement over time, but evidence of poorer control in Independent relative to Supported Sitting. Taken together, these findings underscore the mutually influential and dynamic relations between emerging skills and well-established behaviors.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dev.22527\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dev.22527","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了在家中过渡到无扶手坐姿的过程中,婴儿伸手能力和姿势控制能力的共同发展情况。我们观察了典型自闭症可能性(TL;n = 24)和高自闭症可能性(EL;n = 20)婴儿在过渡到无扶手坐姿期间的四次双周训练(第一次训练时婴儿年龄 = 4.5-8 个月)。在每次训练中,婴儿都坐在有外部支撑或独立支撑的压敏垫上,双腕佩戴磁惯性传感器,并伸手去拿中线上的玩具。分析的重点是描述和比较伸手动作时坐姿的控制,以及有支撑坐姿和独立坐姿时伸手动作的标准运动学指标。虽然 EL 婴儿实现无臂坐姿的时间晚于 TL 婴儿,但在任何测量指标上都不存在组间差异。在各次训练中,婴儿在同时进行伸手动作时对坐姿的控制在两种情况下都有所改善,但与有支撑的坐姿相比,他们在独立坐姿时伸手的稳定性较差。在伸手运动学方面也有类似的效果,随着时间的推移,总体上有所改善,但有证据表明,独立坐姿时的控制能力比有支撑坐姿时差。综上所述,这些发现强调了新兴技能和成熟行为之间相互影响的动态关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reaching While Learning to Sit: Capturing the Kinematics of Co-Developing Skills at Home

This study examined the co-development of infant reaching and postural control across the transition to arms-free sitting at home. We observed infants with typical likelihood (TL; n = 24) and elevated likelihood (EL; n = 20) for autism at four biweekly sessions spanning the transition to arms-free sitting (infant age = 4.5–8 months at first session). At each session, infants sat on a pressure-sensitive mat with external support or independently, wore magneto-inertial sensors on both wrists, and reached for toys presented at midline. Analyses focused on characterizing and comparing control of sitting during reaching actions and standard kinematic metrics of reaching during Supported versus Independent Sitting. Although EL infants achieved arms-free sitting later than TL peers, there were no group differences on any measures. Across sessions, infants’ control of the sitting posture during concurrent reaching movements improved in both contexts, though they were less stable as they reached when sitting independently compared to when sitting with support. A similar effect was apparent in the kinematics of reaches, with overall improvement over time, but evidence of poorer control in Independent relative to Supported Sitting. Taken together, these findings underscore the mutually influential and dynamic relations between emerging skills and well-established behaviors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信