评估 HALP 评分、尿酸值和尿酸-肌酐比值对子痫前期的诊断价值。

IF 0.5 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Yusuf Dal, Sefanur Gamze Karaca, Fatih Akkuş, Şebnem Karagün, Ahmet Zeki Nessar, Ayhan Coşkun
{"title":"评估 HALP 评分、尿酸值和尿酸-肌酐比值对子痫前期的诊断价值。","authors":"Yusuf Dal, Sefanur Gamze Karaca, Fatih Akkuş, Şebnem Karagün, Ahmet Zeki Nessar, Ayhan Coşkun","doi":"10.48095/cccg2024180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of the HALP score, serum uric acid value, and uric acid-creatinine ratio, which are inflammatory markers, in the diagnosis of preeclampsia (PE).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>One hundred sixty-six pregnant women who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in the study. They were divided into two groups: 81 pregnant women diagnosed with PE (PE group) and 85 pregnant women with healthy pregnancies (control group). Demographic and obstetric stories of the groups; weeks of pregnancy at diagnosis; hematological and biochemical parameters; hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet (HALP) score and serum uric acid-creatinine ratio (sUA/sCr); and the results of the newborns were recorded and compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of age, gravidity, parity, and body mass index (P values = 0.533, 0.188, 0.085, 0.915, resp.). Mean gestational age, mean birth weight, 1st and 5th minute Apgar scores, and mean umbilical cord pH values were lower in the PE group compared to the control group (P values = 0.0001 for all). Percentage of NICU admissions was higher in the PE group (P = 0.0001). HALP score of the PE group was significantly lower than the control group (2.2 vs. 3.2; P = 0.0001). Uric acid and sUA/sCr ratios were significantly higher in the PE group compared to the control group (for uric acid, 6.2 ± 1.7 vs. 4.5 ± 1.2; P = 0.0001; for sUA/sCr, 12.0 ± 4.0 vs. 9.9 ± 3.1; P = 0.0001). In diagnosing PE, serum uric acid had a sensitivity of 82.7% at values of 4.7 and above, 58% sensitivity at values of sUA/sCr ratio of 10.9 and above, and 3.7% sensitivity at HALP score values of 6.6 and above (P values = 0.0001, 0.001, 0.001, resp.).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our study, we found that the HALP score in PE was significantly lower than in healthy controls, and the uric acid value and sUA/sCr ratios were significantly higher. Diagnostic value of the serum uric acid value and then the sUA/sCr ratio were higher in PE. However, we found that the HALP score was insufficient for diagnosing PE.</p>","PeriodicalId":43333,"journal":{"name":"Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology","volume":"89 3","pages":"180-187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the diagnostic value of the HALP score, uric acid value, and uric acid-creatinine ratio in preeclampsia.\",\"authors\":\"Yusuf Dal, Sefanur Gamze Karaca, Fatih Akkuş, Şebnem Karagün, Ahmet Zeki Nessar, Ayhan Coşkun\",\"doi\":\"10.48095/cccg2024180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of the HALP score, serum uric acid value, and uric acid-creatinine ratio, which are inflammatory markers, in the diagnosis of preeclampsia (PE).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>One hundred sixty-six pregnant women who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in the study. They were divided into two groups: 81 pregnant women diagnosed with PE (PE group) and 85 pregnant women with healthy pregnancies (control group). Demographic and obstetric stories of the groups; weeks of pregnancy at diagnosis; hematological and biochemical parameters; hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet (HALP) score and serum uric acid-creatinine ratio (sUA/sCr); and the results of the newborns were recorded and compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of age, gravidity, parity, and body mass index (P values = 0.533, 0.188, 0.085, 0.915, resp.). Mean gestational age, mean birth weight, 1st and 5th minute Apgar scores, and mean umbilical cord pH values were lower in the PE group compared to the control group (P values = 0.0001 for all). Percentage of NICU admissions was higher in the PE group (P = 0.0001). HALP score of the PE group was significantly lower than the control group (2.2 vs. 3.2; P = 0.0001). Uric acid and sUA/sCr ratios were significantly higher in the PE group compared to the control group (for uric acid, 6.2 ± 1.7 vs. 4.5 ± 1.2; P = 0.0001; for sUA/sCr, 12.0 ± 4.0 vs. 9.9 ± 3.1; P = 0.0001). In diagnosing PE, serum uric acid had a sensitivity of 82.7% at values of 4.7 and above, 58% sensitivity at values of sUA/sCr ratio of 10.9 and above, and 3.7% sensitivity at HALP score values of 6.6 and above (P values = 0.0001, 0.001, 0.001, resp.).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our study, we found that the HALP score in PE was significantly lower than in healthy controls, and the uric acid value and sUA/sCr ratios were significantly higher. Diagnostic value of the serum uric acid value and then the sUA/sCr ratio were higher in PE. However, we found that the HALP score was insufficient for diagnosing PE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology\",\"volume\":\"89 3\",\"pages\":\"180-187\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48095/cccg2024180\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48095/cccg2024180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在评估作为炎症标志物的 HALP 评分、血清尿酸值和尿酸-肌酐比值在诊断子痫前期(PE)中的诊断价值:研究纳入了 166 名符合纳入和排除标准的孕妇。她们被分为两组:81 名确诊为子痫前期的孕妇(子痫前期组)和 85 名健康孕妇(对照组)。记录并比较两组孕妇的人口统计学和产科病史、确诊时的孕周、血液学和生化指标、血红蛋白、白蛋白、淋巴细胞和血小板(HALP)评分、血清尿酸与肌酐比值(sUA/sCr)以及新生儿的结果:结果:各组在年龄、孕酮、胎次和体重指数方面无明显差异(P 值分别为 0.533、0.188、0.085、0.915)。与对照组相比,PE 组的平均胎龄、平均出生体重、第 1 和第 5 分钟 Apgar 评分以及平均脐带 pH 值均较低(P 值均 = 0.0001)。PE 组入住新生儿重症监护室的比例更高(P = 0.0001)。PE 组的 HALP 评分明显低于对照组(2.2 对 3.2;P = 0.0001)。与对照组相比,PE 组的尿酸和 sUA/sCr 比值明显升高(尿酸:6.2 ± 1.7 vs. 4.5 ± 1.2;P = 0.0001;sUA/sCr:12.0 ± 4.0 vs. 9.9 ± 3.1;P = 0.0001)。在诊断 PE 时,血清尿酸值在 4.7 及以上时的敏感性为 82.7%,sUA/sCr 比值在 10.9 及以上时的敏感性为 58%,HALP 评分值在 6.6 及以上时的敏感性为 3.7%(P 值分别为 0.0001、0.001、0.001):在我们的研究中,我们发现 PE 患者的 HALP 评分明显低于健康对照组,而尿酸值和 sUA/sCr 比值则明显高于健康对照组。血清尿酸值和 sUA/sCr 比值在 PE 中的诊断价值更高。然而,我们发现 HALP 评分不足以诊断 PE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the diagnostic value of the HALP score, uric acid value, and uric acid-creatinine ratio in preeclampsia.

Objective: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of the HALP score, serum uric acid value, and uric acid-creatinine ratio, which are inflammatory markers, in the diagnosis of preeclampsia (PE).

Materials and methods: One hundred sixty-six pregnant women who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in the study. They were divided into two groups: 81 pregnant women diagnosed with PE (PE group) and 85 pregnant women with healthy pregnancies (control group). Demographic and obstetric stories of the groups; weeks of pregnancy at diagnosis; hematological and biochemical parameters; hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet (HALP) score and serum uric acid-creatinine ratio (sUA/sCr); and the results of the newborns were recorded and compared between groups.

Results: There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of age, gravidity, parity, and body mass index (P values = 0.533, 0.188, 0.085, 0.915, resp.). Mean gestational age, mean birth weight, 1st and 5th minute Apgar scores, and mean umbilical cord pH values were lower in the PE group compared to the control group (P values = 0.0001 for all). Percentage of NICU admissions was higher in the PE group (P = 0.0001). HALP score of the PE group was significantly lower than the control group (2.2 vs. 3.2; P = 0.0001). Uric acid and sUA/sCr ratios were significantly higher in the PE group compared to the control group (for uric acid, 6.2 ± 1.7 vs. 4.5 ± 1.2; P = 0.0001; for sUA/sCr, 12.0 ± 4.0 vs. 9.9 ± 3.1; P = 0.0001). In diagnosing PE, serum uric acid had a sensitivity of 82.7% at values of 4.7 and above, 58% sensitivity at values of sUA/sCr ratio of 10.9 and above, and 3.7% sensitivity at HALP score values of 6.6 and above (P values = 0.0001, 0.001, 0.001, resp.).

Conclusion: In our study, we found that the HALP score in PE was significantly lower than in healthy controls, and the uric acid value and sUA/sCr ratios were significantly higher. Diagnostic value of the serum uric acid value and then the sUA/sCr ratio were higher in PE. However, we found that the HALP score was insufficient for diagnosing PE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology
Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信