Marja Kovala, Minna Seppälä, Mikolaj Wojnicki, Eero Honkanen, Seppo Meri, Kati Kaartinen, Anne Räisänen-Sokolowski
{"title":"对膜增生性肾小球肾炎和 C3 肾小球病患者进行无监督聚类,发现了与现有分类不同的患者群体。","authors":"Marja Kovala, Minna Seppälä, Mikolaj Wojnicki, Eero Honkanen, Seppo Meri, Kati Kaartinen, Anne Räisänen-Sokolowski","doi":"10.1159/000539893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis is currently divided into immunoglobulin-mediated glomerulonephritis (IC-MPGN) and C3 glomerulopathy (C3G); however, the patients often overlap with histology, complement, clinical and prognostic factors. Our aim was to investigate if an unsupervised clustering method finds different patient groups in 44 IC-MPGN/C3G patients using only histological and clinical data available in everyday clinical work.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Primary IC-MPGN/C3G adult patients were included whose diagnostic (baseline) native biopsy was obtained in 2006-2017. The biopsies were reassessed and the clinical data at baseline and during follow-up were obtained from the medical records. There were 39 baseline histological and clinical variables included in the unsupervised clustering. Follow-up information was combined with the clustering results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The clustering resulted in two clusters (n = 24 and n = 20 patients for clusters 1-2, respectively), where cluster 1 had a significantly higher baseline plasma creatinine (mean 213 vs. 104, respectively, p value <0.001) and a lower baseline eGFR than cluster 2 (mean 37 vs. 70, respectively, p value <0.001). Regarding histology, chronic changes such as lobulated glomeruli, mesangial matrix expansion, and glomeruli double contours were more prevalent in cluster 1 (p value <0.001). Biopsy morphology was more often crescentic and membranoproliferative in cluster 1 (p value <0.001). Although the differences were insignificant, cluster 1 patients were in dialysis in the last follow-up or had a progressive disease more often than cluster 2 patients (21% vs. 5%, 38% vs. 10%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results indicate that these patients share greater similarity than the current classification IC-MPGN versus C3G indicates.</p>","PeriodicalId":18998,"journal":{"name":"Nephron","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unsupervised Clustering of Membranoproliferative Glomerulonephritis and C3 Glomerulopathy Patients Discovers Distinct Patient Groups unlike the Current Classification.\",\"authors\":\"Marja Kovala, Minna Seppälä, Mikolaj Wojnicki, Eero Honkanen, Seppo Meri, Kati Kaartinen, Anne Räisänen-Sokolowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000539893\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis is currently divided into immunoglobulin-mediated glomerulonephritis (IC-MPGN) and C3 glomerulopathy (C3G); however, the patients often overlap with histology, complement, clinical and prognostic factors. Our aim was to investigate if an unsupervised clustering method finds different patient groups in 44 IC-MPGN/C3G patients using only histological and clinical data available in everyday clinical work.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Primary IC-MPGN/C3G adult patients were included whose diagnostic (baseline) native biopsy was obtained in 2006-2017. The biopsies were reassessed and the clinical data at baseline and during follow-up were obtained from the medical records. There were 39 baseline histological and clinical variables included in the unsupervised clustering. Follow-up information was combined with the clustering results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The clustering resulted in two clusters (n = 24 and n = 20 patients for clusters 1-2, respectively), where cluster 1 had a significantly higher baseline plasma creatinine (mean 213 vs. 104, respectively, p value <0.001) and a lower baseline eGFR than cluster 2 (mean 37 vs. 70, respectively, p value <0.001). Regarding histology, chronic changes such as lobulated glomeruli, mesangial matrix expansion, and glomeruli double contours were more prevalent in cluster 1 (p value <0.001). Biopsy morphology was more often crescentic and membranoproliferative in cluster 1 (p value <0.001). Although the differences were insignificant, cluster 1 patients were in dialysis in the last follow-up or had a progressive disease more often than cluster 2 patients (21% vs. 5%, 38% vs. 10%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results indicate that these patients share greater similarity than the current classification IC-MPGN versus C3G indicates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nephron\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nephron\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539893\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nephron","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539893","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Unsupervised Clustering of Membranoproliferative Glomerulonephritis and C3 Glomerulopathy Patients Discovers Distinct Patient Groups unlike the Current Classification.
Introduction: Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis is currently divided into immunoglobulin-mediated glomerulonephritis (IC-MPGN) and C3 glomerulopathy (C3G); however, the patients often overlap with histology, complement, clinical and prognostic factors. Our aim was to investigate if an unsupervised clustering method finds different patient groups in 44 IC-MPGN/C3G patients using only histological and clinical data available in everyday clinical work.
Methods: Primary IC-MPGN/C3G adult patients were included whose diagnostic (baseline) native biopsy was obtained in 2006-2017. The biopsies were reassessed and the clinical data at baseline and during follow-up were obtained from the medical records. There were 39 baseline histological and clinical variables included in the unsupervised clustering. Follow-up information was combined with the clustering results.
Results: The clustering resulted in two clusters (n = 24 and n = 20 patients for clusters 1-2, respectively), where cluster 1 had a significantly higher baseline plasma creatinine (mean 213 vs. 104, respectively, p value <0.001) and a lower baseline eGFR than cluster 2 (mean 37 vs. 70, respectively, p value <0.001). Regarding histology, chronic changes such as lobulated glomeruli, mesangial matrix expansion, and glomeruli double contours were more prevalent in cluster 1 (p value <0.001). Biopsy morphology was more often crescentic and membranoproliferative in cluster 1 (p value <0.001). Although the differences were insignificant, cluster 1 patients were in dialysis in the last follow-up or had a progressive disease more often than cluster 2 patients (21% vs. 5%, 38% vs. 10%).
Conclusions: Our results indicate that these patients share greater similarity than the current classification IC-MPGN versus C3G indicates.
期刊介绍:
''Nephron'' comprises three sections, which are each under the editorship of internationally recognized leaders and served by specialized Associate Editors. Apart from high-quality original research, ''Nephron'' publishes invited reviews/minireviews on up-to-date topics. Papers undergo an innovative and transparent peer review process encompassing a Presentation Report which assesses and summarizes the presentation of the paper in an unbiased and standardized way.