价值链管理对创新绩效的影响:意大利供应商研究

IF 4 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS
Emanuele Brancati, Carlo Pietrobelli, Caio Torres Mazzi
{"title":"价值链管理对创新绩效的影响:意大利供应商研究","authors":"Emanuele Brancati, Carlo Pietrobelli, Caio Torres Mazzi","doi":"10.1007/s40821-024-00267-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper explores how value chain governance affects the innovation performance of suppliers of intermediate products. We take advantage of a unique dataset of Italian firms to identify governance regimes based on the perceived levels of technological capabilities of suppliers and explicit coordination in the value chain. Our results indicate that ‘modular’ value chain governance is more conducive to innovation for suppliers, especially when these firms have medium capability levels. Conversely, market-based governance modes relate strongly to lower innovativeness amongst suppliers, particularly those with lower capabilities. These patterns are also reflected in the sales of innovative products. Our results go partially against other findings in the GVC literature, whereby relational value chains are usually seen as providing the most favorable environment for learning and innovation.</p>","PeriodicalId":51741,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Business Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Influence of value chain governance on innovation performance: A study of Italian suppliers\",\"authors\":\"Emanuele Brancati, Carlo Pietrobelli, Caio Torres Mazzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40821-024-00267-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper explores how value chain governance affects the innovation performance of suppliers of intermediate products. We take advantage of a unique dataset of Italian firms to identify governance regimes based on the perceived levels of technological capabilities of suppliers and explicit coordination in the value chain. Our results indicate that ‘modular’ value chain governance is more conducive to innovation for suppliers, especially when these firms have medium capability levels. Conversely, market-based governance modes relate strongly to lower innovativeness amongst suppliers, particularly those with lower capabilities. These patterns are also reflected in the sales of innovative products. Our results go partially against other findings in the GVC literature, whereby relational value chains are usually seen as providing the most favorable environment for learning and innovation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eurasian Business Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eurasian Business Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-024-00267-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-024-00267-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了价值链治理如何影响中间产品供应商的创新绩效。我们利用意大利企业的独特数据集,根据供应商的认知技术能力水平和价值链中的明确协调,确定了治理制度。我们的研究结果表明,"模块化 "价值链治理更有利于供应商的创新,尤其是当这些企业的能力水平处于中等水平时。相反,基于市场的治理模式与供应商创新能力较低密切相关,尤其是那些能力较低的供应商。这些模式也反映在创新产品的销售上。我们的研究结果与全球价值链文献中的其他研究结果部分相悖,关系型价值链通常被视为为学习和创新提供了最有利的环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Influence of value chain governance on innovation performance: A study of Italian suppliers

This paper explores how value chain governance affects the innovation performance of suppliers of intermediate products. We take advantage of a unique dataset of Italian firms to identify governance regimes based on the perceived levels of technological capabilities of suppliers and explicit coordination in the value chain. Our results indicate that ‘modular’ value chain governance is more conducive to innovation for suppliers, especially when these firms have medium capability levels. Conversely, market-based governance modes relate strongly to lower innovativeness amongst suppliers, particularly those with lower capabilities. These patterns are also reflected in the sales of innovative products. Our results go partially against other findings in the GVC literature, whereby relational value chains are usually seen as providing the most favorable environment for learning and innovation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
11.40%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The Eurasian Business Review (EABR) publishes articles in Industrial Organization, Innovation and Management Science. In particular, EABR is committed to publishing empirical articles which provide significant contributions in the fields of the economics and management of innovation, industrial and business economics, corporate governance and corporate finance, entrepreneurship and organizational change, strategic management, accounting, marketing, human resources management, and information systems. While the main focus of EABR is on Europe and Asia, papers in the fields listed above on any region or country are highly encouraged. The Eurasian Business Review is one of the two official journals of the Eurasia Business and Economics Society (EBES) and is published quarterly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信