以政府政策和企业社会责任为导向的碳减排和社会环境影响

IF 4 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Hua Wang, Yanle Xie, Cuicui Wang, Weihua Huang
{"title":"以政府政策和企业社会责任为导向的碳减排和社会环境影响","authors":"Hua Wang, Yanle Xie, Cuicui Wang, Weihua Huang","doi":"10.1007/s13132-024-02117-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Under the constraint of considering corporate social responsibility (CSR), companies have to consider the impact of corporate social responsibility on their production operations and carbon abatement decisions. Therefore, we develop three decision models to explore the impact of different subsidy policies on manufacturers’ carbon emission reduction under CSR, and analyze the optimal subsidy policies. Furthermore, we investigate the impact of CSR on social welfare and social environment under different subsidy policies. We find that manufacturers are more willing to reduce carbon emissions, mitigate negative environmental impacts, and improve social welfare under consumer subsidies. However, we find that social welfare and socio-environmental impacts under consumer subsidies are not necessarily better than manufacturer subsidies when the level of CSR is low. Besides, we show that manufacturer subsidies are not always beneficial for improving social welfare and reducing negative socio-environmental impacts. Moreover, we find that manufacturer subsidies may lead to worse environmental impacts and social welfare when the level of CSR is low.</p>","PeriodicalId":47435,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Knowledge Economy","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carbon Abatement and Socio-environmental Impacts Oriented to Government Policies and Corporate Social Responsibility\",\"authors\":\"Hua Wang, Yanle Xie, Cuicui Wang, Weihua Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13132-024-02117-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Under the constraint of considering corporate social responsibility (CSR), companies have to consider the impact of corporate social responsibility on their production operations and carbon abatement decisions. Therefore, we develop three decision models to explore the impact of different subsidy policies on manufacturers’ carbon emission reduction under CSR, and analyze the optimal subsidy policies. Furthermore, we investigate the impact of CSR on social welfare and social environment under different subsidy policies. We find that manufacturers are more willing to reduce carbon emissions, mitigate negative environmental impacts, and improve social welfare under consumer subsidies. However, we find that social welfare and socio-environmental impacts under consumer subsidies are not necessarily better than manufacturer subsidies when the level of CSR is low. Besides, we show that manufacturer subsidies are not always beneficial for improving social welfare and reducing negative socio-environmental impacts. Moreover, we find that manufacturer subsidies may lead to worse environmental impacts and social welfare when the level of CSR is low.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Knowledge Economy\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Knowledge Economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02117-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Knowledge Economy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02117-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在考虑企业社会责任(CSR)的约束下,企业不得不考虑企业社会责任对其生产运营和碳减排决策的影响。因此,我们建立了三个决策模型来探讨企业社会责任下不同补贴政策对制造商碳减排的影响,并分析最优补贴政策。此外,我们还研究了不同补贴政策下企业社会责任对社会福利和社会环境的影响。我们发现,在消费者补贴下,制造商更愿意减少碳排放,减轻对环境的负面影响,提高社会福利。然而,我们发现,当企业社会责任水平较低时,消费者补贴下的社会福利和社会环境影响并不一定优于制造商补贴。此外,我们还发现制造商补贴并不总是有利于提高社会福利和减少对社会环境的负面影响。此外,我们还发现,当企业社会责任水平较低时,制造商补贴可能会导致更糟糕的环境影响和社会福利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Carbon Abatement and Socio-environmental Impacts Oriented to Government Policies and Corporate Social Responsibility

Carbon Abatement and Socio-environmental Impacts Oriented to Government Policies and Corporate Social Responsibility

Under the constraint of considering corporate social responsibility (CSR), companies have to consider the impact of corporate social responsibility on their production operations and carbon abatement decisions. Therefore, we develop three decision models to explore the impact of different subsidy policies on manufacturers’ carbon emission reduction under CSR, and analyze the optimal subsidy policies. Furthermore, we investigate the impact of CSR on social welfare and social environment under different subsidy policies. We find that manufacturers are more willing to reduce carbon emissions, mitigate negative environmental impacts, and improve social welfare under consumer subsidies. However, we find that social welfare and socio-environmental impacts under consumer subsidies are not necessarily better than manufacturer subsidies when the level of CSR is low. Besides, we show that manufacturer subsidies are not always beneficial for improving social welfare and reducing negative socio-environmental impacts. Moreover, we find that manufacturer subsidies may lead to worse environmental impacts and social welfare when the level of CSR is low.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
27.30%
发文量
228
期刊介绍: In the context of rapid globalization and technological capacity, the world’s economies today are driven increasingly by knowledge—the expertise, skills, experience, education, understanding, awareness, perception, and other qualities required to communicate, interpret, and analyze information. New wealth is created by the application of knowledge to improve productivity—and to create new products, services, systems, and process (i.e., to innovate). The Journal of the Knowledge Economy focuses on the dynamics of the knowledge-based economy, with an emphasis on the role of knowledge creation, diffusion, and application across three economic levels: (1) the systemic ''meta'' or ''macro''-level, (2) the organizational ''meso''-level, and (3) the individual ''micro''-level. The journal incorporates insights from the fields of economics, management, law, sociology, anthropology, psychology, and political science to shed new light on the evolving role of knowledge, with a particular emphasis on how innovation can be leveraged to provide solutions to complex problems and issues, including global crises in environmental sustainability, education, and economic development. Articles emphasize empirical studies, underscoring a comparative approach, and, to a lesser extent, case studies and theoretical articles. The journal balances practice/application and theory/concepts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信