基于问题的在线学习和课堂学习:在线学习和基于问题的课堂学习:哪一个在提高高等教育英语语言课堂教学的学习成果和批判性思维方面更有效?

IF 5.1 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Ali Orhan
{"title":"基于问题的在线学习和课堂学习:在线学习和基于问题的课堂学习:哪一个在提高高等教育英语语言课堂教学的学习成果和批判性思维方面更有效?","authors":"Ali Orhan","doi":"10.1111/jcal.13033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Although problem based learning has a great potential to promote learning outcomes as well as cognitive abilities, the number of previous studies investigating this potential on critical thinking, reading comprehension abilities and attitudes in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) context is scarce. Also, the number of studies comparing the effectiveness of online and face-to-face problem based learning on these variables is scarcer and this limited research has yielded contradictory results.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to investigate and compare the effectiveness of online and face-to-face problem based learning on critical thinking skills, dispositions, reading comprehension abilities, and attitudes of EFL students.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Pretest-posttest control group quasi-experimental design was employed in this study that has two experimental groups and one control group. There were 23 (13 females and 10 males), 23 (14 females and 9 males), and 22 (12 females and 10 males) EFL students in online problem based learning group, face-to-face problem based learning group, and control group, respectively. In the first experimental group, problem based learning activities were conducted online while the same activities were conducted face-to-face in the classroom in the second experimental group. In the control group, no experimental procedures were followed and the students continued their regular instructor-led reading activities. Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Test, Sosu Critical Thinking Dispositions Scale, Reading Comprehension Test, and Attitudes Towards English Scale were used to collect the data. The data were analysed using paired-samples <i>t</i>-test and ANCOVA with pretest scores as the covariate variable.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results and Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>It was found that problem based learning, either online or face-to-face, significantly enhanced EFL learners' reading comprehension abilities and attitudes towards English as well as their critical thinking skills and dispositions. It was also concluded that online problem based learning is more effective to enhance reading comprehension abilities and attitudes than face-to-face problem based learning while they are equally effective in promoting critical thinking skills and dispositions in EFL classroom.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>This study has significant implications for educators and researchers. As this study showed that online problem based learning is a promising alternative to face-to-face problem based learning, universities, educators, administrators, and researchers can organize their problem based learning activities online to promote learning outcomes and cognitive abilities in language classrooms. Also, future studies employing qualitative or mixed methods can be conducted with sample groups from different educational levels to provide an in-depth examination of the advantages and disadvantages of online and face-to-face problem based learning.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","volume":"40 5","pages":"2351-2368"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jcal.13033","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Online or in-class problem based learning: Which one is more effective in enhancing learning outcomes and critical thinking in higher education EFL classroom?\",\"authors\":\"Ali Orhan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jcal.13033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Although problem based learning has a great potential to promote learning outcomes as well as cognitive abilities, the number of previous studies investigating this potential on critical thinking, reading comprehension abilities and attitudes in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) context is scarce. Also, the number of studies comparing the effectiveness of online and face-to-face problem based learning on these variables is scarcer and this limited research has yielded contradictory results.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aimed to investigate and compare the effectiveness of online and face-to-face problem based learning on critical thinking skills, dispositions, reading comprehension abilities, and attitudes of EFL students.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>Pretest-posttest control group quasi-experimental design was employed in this study that has two experimental groups and one control group. There were 23 (13 females and 10 males), 23 (14 females and 9 males), and 22 (12 females and 10 males) EFL students in online problem based learning group, face-to-face problem based learning group, and control group, respectively. In the first experimental group, problem based learning activities were conducted online while the same activities were conducted face-to-face in the classroom in the second experimental group. In the control group, no experimental procedures were followed and the students continued their regular instructor-led reading activities. Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Test, Sosu Critical Thinking Dispositions Scale, Reading Comprehension Test, and Attitudes Towards English Scale were used to collect the data. The data were analysed using paired-samples <i>t</i>-test and ANCOVA with pretest scores as the covariate variable.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results and Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>It was found that problem based learning, either online or face-to-face, significantly enhanced EFL learners' reading comprehension abilities and attitudes towards English as well as their critical thinking skills and dispositions. It was also concluded that online problem based learning is more effective to enhance reading comprehension abilities and attitudes than face-to-face problem based learning while they are equally effective in promoting critical thinking skills and dispositions in EFL classroom.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Implications</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study has significant implications for educators and researchers. As this study showed that online problem based learning is a promising alternative to face-to-face problem based learning, universities, educators, administrators, and researchers can organize their problem based learning activities online to promote learning outcomes and cognitive abilities in language classrooms. Also, future studies employing qualitative or mixed methods can be conducted with sample groups from different educational levels to provide an in-depth examination of the advantages and disadvantages of online and face-to-face problem based learning.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning\",\"volume\":\"40 5\",\"pages\":\"2351-2368\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jcal.13033\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcal.13033\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcal.13033","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景虽然基于问题的学习在促进学习成果和认知能力方面有很大的潜力,但以前很少有研究调查这种潜力在作为外语的英语(EFL)环境中对批判性思维、阅读理解能力和态度的影响。本研究旨在调查和比较基于问题的在线学习和面对面学习对 EFL 学生的批判性思维能力、处置能力、阅读理解能力和态度的影响。方法本研究采用了 "retest-posttest control group "准实验设计,即两个实验组和一个对照组。在线问题学习组、面对面问题学习组和对照组分别有 23 名(女 13 名,男 10 名)、23 名(女 14 名,男 9 名)和 22 名(女 12 名,男 10 名)EFL 学生。在第一实验组中,基于问题的学习活动是在网上进行的,而在第二实验组中,同样的活动是在课堂上面对面进行的。在对照组中,没有采用任何实验程序,学生继续进行教师指导的常规阅读活动。收集数据时使用了 Watson-Glaser 批判性思维测试、Sosu 批判性思维倾向量表、阅读理解测试和英语态度量表。结果与结论研究发现,基于问题的在线或面授学习能显著提高 EFL 学习者的阅读理解能力、对英语的态度以及批判性思维能力和处置能力。本研究对教育工作者和研究人员具有重要意义。本研究表明,在线问题式学习是面授问题式学习的一种有前途的替代方式,因此,大学、教育工作者、管理者和研究人员可以组织在线问题式学习活动,以促进语言课堂的学习成果和认知能力。此外,未来的研究可以采用定性或混合方法,以不同教育水平的样本群体为对象,深入探讨在线和面对面问题式学习的优缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Online or in-class problem based learning: Which one is more effective in enhancing learning outcomes and critical thinking in higher education EFL classroom?

Background

Although problem based learning has a great potential to promote learning outcomes as well as cognitive abilities, the number of previous studies investigating this potential on critical thinking, reading comprehension abilities and attitudes in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) context is scarce. Also, the number of studies comparing the effectiveness of online and face-to-face problem based learning on these variables is scarcer and this limited research has yielded contradictory results.

Objectives

This study aimed to investigate and compare the effectiveness of online and face-to-face problem based learning on critical thinking skills, dispositions, reading comprehension abilities, and attitudes of EFL students.

Method

Pretest-posttest control group quasi-experimental design was employed in this study that has two experimental groups and one control group. There were 23 (13 females and 10 males), 23 (14 females and 9 males), and 22 (12 females and 10 males) EFL students in online problem based learning group, face-to-face problem based learning group, and control group, respectively. In the first experimental group, problem based learning activities were conducted online while the same activities were conducted face-to-face in the classroom in the second experimental group. In the control group, no experimental procedures were followed and the students continued their regular instructor-led reading activities. Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Test, Sosu Critical Thinking Dispositions Scale, Reading Comprehension Test, and Attitudes Towards English Scale were used to collect the data. The data were analysed using paired-samples t-test and ANCOVA with pretest scores as the covariate variable.

Results and Conclusions

It was found that problem based learning, either online or face-to-face, significantly enhanced EFL learners' reading comprehension abilities and attitudes towards English as well as their critical thinking skills and dispositions. It was also concluded that online problem based learning is more effective to enhance reading comprehension abilities and attitudes than face-to-face problem based learning while they are equally effective in promoting critical thinking skills and dispositions in EFL classroom.

Implications

This study has significant implications for educators and researchers. As this study showed that online problem based learning is a promising alternative to face-to-face problem based learning, universities, educators, administrators, and researchers can organize their problem based learning activities online to promote learning outcomes and cognitive abilities in language classrooms. Also, future studies employing qualitative or mixed methods can be conducted with sample groups from different educational levels to provide an in-depth examination of the advantages and disadvantages of online and face-to-face problem based learning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.00%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: The Journal of Computer Assisted Learning is an international peer-reviewed journal which covers the whole range of uses of information and communication technology to support learning and knowledge exchange. It aims to provide a medium for communication among researchers as well as a channel linking researchers, practitioners, and policy makers. JCAL is also a rich source of material for master and PhD students in areas such as educational psychology, the learning sciences, instructional technology, instructional design, collaborative learning, intelligent learning systems, learning analytics, open, distance and networked learning, and educational evaluation and assessment. This is the case for formal (e.g., schools), non-formal (e.g., workplace learning) and informal learning (e.g., museums and libraries) situations and environments. Volumes often include one Special Issue which these provides readers with a broad and in-depth perspective on a specific topic. First published in 1985, JCAL continues to have the aim of making the outcomes of contemporary research and experience accessible. During this period there have been major technological advances offering new opportunities and approaches in the use of a wide range of technologies to support learning and knowledge transfer more generally. There is currently much emphasis on the use of network functionality and the challenges its appropriate uses pose to teachers/tutors working with students locally and at a distance. JCAL welcomes: -Empirical reports, single studies or programmatic series of studies on the use of computers and information technologies in learning and assessment -Critical and original meta-reviews of literature on the use of computers for learning -Empirical studies on the design and development of innovative technology-based systems for learning -Conceptual articles on issues relating to the Aims and Scope
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信