成功实施欧盟 HTA 法规的导航之路:欧洲获取学院 2023 年春季大会的主要收获。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Francine Brinkhuis, Elaine Julian, Hendrika van den Ham, Fabrizio Gianfrate, Valentina Strammiello, Michael Berntgen, Mira Pavlovic, Peter Mol, Jürgen Wasem, Walter Van Dyck, Antonella Cardone, Christian Dierks, Anja Schiel, Renato Bernardini, Oriol Solà-Morales, Jörg Ruof, Wim Goettsch
{"title":"成功实施欧盟 HTA 法规的导航之路:欧洲获取学院 2023 年春季大会的主要收获。","authors":"Francine Brinkhuis, Elaine Julian, Hendrika van den Ham, Fabrizio Gianfrate, Valentina Strammiello, Michael Berntgen, Mira Pavlovic, Peter Mol, Jürgen Wasem, Walter Van Dyck, Antonella Cardone, Christian Dierks, Anja Schiel, Renato Bernardini, Oriol Solà-Morales, Jörg Ruof, Wim Goettsch","doi":"10.1186/s12961-024-01154-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The European Regulation on Health Technology Assessment (EU HTA R), effective since January 2022, aims to harmonize and improve the efficiency of common HTA across Member States (MS), with a phased implementation from January 2025. At \"midterms\" of the preparation phase for the implementation of the Regulation our aim was to identify and prioritize tangible action points to move forward.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>During the 2023 Spring Convention of the European Access Academy (EAA), participants from different nationalities and stakeholder backgrounds discussed readiness and remaining challenges for the Regulation's implementation and identified and prioritized action points. For this purpose, participants were assigned to four working groups: (i) Health Policy Challenges, (ii) Stakeholder Readiness, (iii) Approach to Uncertainty and (iv) Challenges regarding Methodology. Top four action points for each working group were identified and subsequently ranked by all participants during the final plenary session.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall \"readiness\" for the Regulation was perceived as neutral. Prioritized action points included the following: Health Policy, i.e. assess adjustability of MS laws and health policy processes; Stakeholders, i.e. capacity building; Uncertainty, i.e. implement HTA guidelines as living documents; Methodology, i.e. clarify the Population, Intervention, Comparator(s), Outcomes (PICO) identification process.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>At \"midterms\" of the preparation phase, the focus for the months to come is on executing the tangible action points identified at EAA's Spring Convention. All action points centre around three overarching themes: harmonization and standardization, capacity building and collaboration, uncertainty management and robust data. These themes will ultimately determine the success of the EU HTA R in the long run.</p>","PeriodicalId":12870,"journal":{"name":"Health Research Policy and Systems","volume":"22 1","pages":"74"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11218320/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating the path towards successful implementation of the EU HTA Regulation: key takeaways from the 2023 Spring Convention of the European Access Academy.\",\"authors\":\"Francine Brinkhuis, Elaine Julian, Hendrika van den Ham, Fabrizio Gianfrate, Valentina Strammiello, Michael Berntgen, Mira Pavlovic, Peter Mol, Jürgen Wasem, Walter Van Dyck, Antonella Cardone, Christian Dierks, Anja Schiel, Renato Bernardini, Oriol Solà-Morales, Jörg Ruof, Wim Goettsch\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12961-024-01154-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The European Regulation on Health Technology Assessment (EU HTA R), effective since January 2022, aims to harmonize and improve the efficiency of common HTA across Member States (MS), with a phased implementation from January 2025. At \\\"midterms\\\" of the preparation phase for the implementation of the Regulation our aim was to identify and prioritize tangible action points to move forward.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>During the 2023 Spring Convention of the European Access Academy (EAA), participants from different nationalities and stakeholder backgrounds discussed readiness and remaining challenges for the Regulation's implementation and identified and prioritized action points. For this purpose, participants were assigned to four working groups: (i) Health Policy Challenges, (ii) Stakeholder Readiness, (iii) Approach to Uncertainty and (iv) Challenges regarding Methodology. Top four action points for each working group were identified and subsequently ranked by all participants during the final plenary session.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall \\\"readiness\\\" for the Regulation was perceived as neutral. Prioritized action points included the following: Health Policy, i.e. assess adjustability of MS laws and health policy processes; Stakeholders, i.e. capacity building; Uncertainty, i.e. implement HTA guidelines as living documents; Methodology, i.e. clarify the Population, Intervention, Comparator(s), Outcomes (PICO) identification process.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>At \\\"midterms\\\" of the preparation phase, the focus for the months to come is on executing the tangible action points identified at EAA's Spring Convention. All action points centre around three overarching themes: harmonization and standardization, capacity building and collaboration, uncertainty management and robust data. These themes will ultimately determine the success of the EU HTA R in the long run.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12870,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Research Policy and Systems\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11218320/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Research Policy and Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-024-01154-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Research Policy and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-024-01154-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:自 2022 年 1 月起生效的《欧洲卫生技术评估条例》(EU HTA R)旨在协调和提高各成员国(MS)共同卫生技术评估的效率,并从 2025 年 1 月起分阶段实施。在《条例》实施准备阶段的 "中期",我们的目标是确定并优先考虑切实可行的行动要点,以推进《条例》的实施:在欧洲无障碍学院(EAA)2023 年春季大会期间,来自不同国家和利益相关者背景的与会者讨论了条例实施的准备情况和仍然面临的挑战,并确定了行动要点和优先次序。为此,与会者被分配到四个工作组:(i) 卫生政策挑战,(ii) 利益相关者的准备情况,(iii) 应对不确定性的方法,(iv) 方法方面的挑战。在最后一次全体会议上,所有与会者确定了每个工作组的前四个行动要点,并进行了排名:结果:《条例》的总体 "准备程度 "被认为是中性的。优先行动要点包括以下方面:卫生政策,即评估 MS 法律和卫生政策流程的可调整性;利益相关者,即能力建设;不确定性,即实施作为活文件的 HTA 指南;方法学,即明确人口、干预措施、比较者、结果 (PICO) 识别流程:在筹备阶段的 "中期",未来几个月的重点是执行监管局春季大会上确定的具体行动要点。所有行动要点都围绕三个首要主题:统一和标准化、能力建设与合作、不确定性管理和可靠数据。从长远来看,这些主题将最终决定欧盟 HTA R 的成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Navigating the path towards successful implementation of the EU HTA Regulation: key takeaways from the 2023 Spring Convention of the European Access Academy.

Background: The European Regulation on Health Technology Assessment (EU HTA R), effective since January 2022, aims to harmonize and improve the efficiency of common HTA across Member States (MS), with a phased implementation from January 2025. At "midterms" of the preparation phase for the implementation of the Regulation our aim was to identify and prioritize tangible action points to move forward.

Methods: During the 2023 Spring Convention of the European Access Academy (EAA), participants from different nationalities and stakeholder backgrounds discussed readiness and remaining challenges for the Regulation's implementation and identified and prioritized action points. For this purpose, participants were assigned to four working groups: (i) Health Policy Challenges, (ii) Stakeholder Readiness, (iii) Approach to Uncertainty and (iv) Challenges regarding Methodology. Top four action points for each working group were identified and subsequently ranked by all participants during the final plenary session.

Results: Overall "readiness" for the Regulation was perceived as neutral. Prioritized action points included the following: Health Policy, i.e. assess adjustability of MS laws and health policy processes; Stakeholders, i.e. capacity building; Uncertainty, i.e. implement HTA guidelines as living documents; Methodology, i.e. clarify the Population, Intervention, Comparator(s), Outcomes (PICO) identification process.

Conclusions: At "midterms" of the preparation phase, the focus for the months to come is on executing the tangible action points identified at EAA's Spring Convention. All action points centre around three overarching themes: harmonization and standardization, capacity building and collaboration, uncertainty management and robust data. These themes will ultimately determine the success of the EU HTA R in the long run.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Research Policy and Systems
Health Research Policy and Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.50%
发文量
124
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Research Policy and Systems is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that aims to provide a platform for the global research community to share their views, findings, insights and successes. Health Research Policy and Systems considers manuscripts that investigate the role of evidence-based health policy and health research systems in ensuring the efficient utilization and application of knowledge to improve health and health equity, especially in developing countries. Research is the foundation for improvements in public health. The problem is that people involved in different areas of research, together with managers and administrators in charge of research entities, do not communicate sufficiently with each other.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信