选择决定了森林生态系统中树木和土壤真菌相似性的距离模式

IF 24.5 1区 生物学 Q1 MYCOLOGY
Yue-Hua Hu, Daniel J. Johnson, Zhen-Hua Sun, Lian-Ming Gao, Han-Dong Wen, Kun Xu, Hua Huang, Wei-Wei Liu, Min Cao, Ze-Wei Song, Peter G. Kennedy
{"title":"选择决定了森林生态系统中树木和土壤真菌相似性的距离模式","authors":"Yue-Hua Hu, Daniel J. Johnson, Zhen-Hua Sun, Lian-Ming Gao, Han-Dong Wen, Kun Xu, Hua Huang, Wei-Wei Liu, Min Cao, Ze-Wei Song, Peter G. Kennedy","doi":"10.1007/s13225-024-00537-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>How the four major processes affecting community assembly—selection, dispersal, drift, and diversification—solely or jointly shape co-occurring assemblages of macro- and microorganisms at the same scales remains poorly understood. Here, we delved into the distance pattern of similarity (DPS) in tree and soil fungal communities in three <i>c.</i> 20-hectare forest plots spanning tropical to temperate climates in Yunnan province, Southwest China. Specifically, we decrypted the assembly contribution of individual-based random sampling, selection and/or dispersal using drift-inexplicit ordination and drift-explicit baseline models. Surprisingly, our findings demonstrated that most soil fungal realized distribution ranges (RDR) were shorter than most trees. Because of explicitly integrating drift and the range of DPS is broader than the RDR of most trees and fungi, selection baseline models overwhelmingly captured the DPS structures in trees and fungi across spatial scales in tropical, subtropical, and subalpine forest ecosystems and that for fungi across taxonomic levels and fungal guilds. Under the premise that modeling frameworks, ecosystems, spatial scales, sample intensities, selection variables, and dispersal variables are well unified, the ubiquitous dominance of selection elucidates no fundamental difference in the assembly mechanism between trees and soil fungi.</p>","PeriodicalId":12471,"journal":{"name":"Fungal Diversity","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":24.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selection dictates the distance pattern of similarity in trees and soil fungi across forest ecosystems\",\"authors\":\"Yue-Hua Hu, Daniel J. Johnson, Zhen-Hua Sun, Lian-Ming Gao, Han-Dong Wen, Kun Xu, Hua Huang, Wei-Wei Liu, Min Cao, Ze-Wei Song, Peter G. Kennedy\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13225-024-00537-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>How the four major processes affecting community assembly—selection, dispersal, drift, and diversification—solely or jointly shape co-occurring assemblages of macro- and microorganisms at the same scales remains poorly understood. Here, we delved into the distance pattern of similarity (DPS) in tree and soil fungal communities in three <i>c.</i> 20-hectare forest plots spanning tropical to temperate climates in Yunnan province, Southwest China. Specifically, we decrypted the assembly contribution of individual-based random sampling, selection and/or dispersal using drift-inexplicit ordination and drift-explicit baseline models. Surprisingly, our findings demonstrated that most soil fungal realized distribution ranges (RDR) were shorter than most trees. Because of explicitly integrating drift and the range of DPS is broader than the RDR of most trees and fungi, selection baseline models overwhelmingly captured the DPS structures in trees and fungi across spatial scales in tropical, subtropical, and subalpine forest ecosystems and that for fungi across taxonomic levels and fungal guilds. Under the premise that modeling frameworks, ecosystems, spatial scales, sample intensities, selection variables, and dispersal variables are well unified, the ubiquitous dominance of selection elucidates no fundamental difference in the assembly mechanism between trees and soil fungi.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fungal Diversity\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":24.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fungal Diversity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-024-00537-8\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MYCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fungal Diversity","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-024-00537-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MYCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

影响群落组合的四个主要过程--选择、扩散、漂移和多样化--是如何在同一尺度上单独或共同形成共生的大型生物和微生物群落的,人们对此仍然知之甚少。在这里,我们深入研究了中国西南部云南省从热带气候到温带气候的三个面积约 20 公顷的林地中树木和土壤真菌群落的相似性距离模式(DPS)。具体而言,我们利用漂移-非显性序化和漂移-显性基线模型解密了基于个体的随机取样、选择和/或扩散的集合贡献。令人惊讶的是,我们的研究结果表明,大多数土壤真菌的实现分布范围(RDR)比大多数树木短。由于明确地整合了漂移,而且DPS的范围比大多数树木和真菌的RDR更广,因此选择基线模型在热带、亚热带和亚高山森林生态系统的空间尺度上绝大多数捕捉到了树木和真菌的DPS结构,而真菌的DPS结构则捕捉到了不同分类水平和真菌行业的DPS结构。在建模框架、生态系统、空间尺度、样本强度、选择变量和散布变量完全统一的前提下,无处不在的选择优势说明树木和土壤真菌的组装机制没有本质区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Selection dictates the distance pattern of similarity in trees and soil fungi across forest ecosystems

Selection dictates the distance pattern of similarity in trees and soil fungi across forest ecosystems

How the four major processes affecting community assembly—selection, dispersal, drift, and diversification—solely or jointly shape co-occurring assemblages of macro- and microorganisms at the same scales remains poorly understood. Here, we delved into the distance pattern of similarity (DPS) in tree and soil fungal communities in three c. 20-hectare forest plots spanning tropical to temperate climates in Yunnan province, Southwest China. Specifically, we decrypted the assembly contribution of individual-based random sampling, selection and/or dispersal using drift-inexplicit ordination and drift-explicit baseline models. Surprisingly, our findings demonstrated that most soil fungal realized distribution ranges (RDR) were shorter than most trees. Because of explicitly integrating drift and the range of DPS is broader than the RDR of most trees and fungi, selection baseline models overwhelmingly captured the DPS structures in trees and fungi across spatial scales in tropical, subtropical, and subalpine forest ecosystems and that for fungi across taxonomic levels and fungal guilds. Under the premise that modeling frameworks, ecosystems, spatial scales, sample intensities, selection variables, and dispersal variables are well unified, the ubiquitous dominance of selection elucidates no fundamental difference in the assembly mechanism between trees and soil fungi.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fungal Diversity
Fungal Diversity 生物-真菌学
CiteScore
44.80
自引率
9.90%
发文量
17
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Fungal Diversity, the official journal of the Kunming Institute of Botany of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, is an international, peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of mycology. It prioritizes papers on biodiversity, systematic, and molecular phylogeny. While it welcomes novel research and review articles, authors aiming to publish checklists are advised to seek regional journals, and the introduction of new species and genera should generally be supported by molecular data. Published articles undergo peer review and are accessible online first with a permanent DOI, making them citable as the official Version of Record according to NISO RP-8-2008 standards. Any necessary corrections after online publication require the publication of an Erratum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信