利用特征分析和 ROC 曲线研究中学生完美主义与学业自我效能感之间的关系。

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Andrea Fuster-Rico , María Vicent , Carolina Gonzálvez , María Pérez-Marco , Lucía Granados-Alós , Raquel Suriá
{"title":"利用特征分析和 ROC 曲线研究中学生完美主义与学业自我效能感之间的关系。","authors":"Andrea Fuster-Rico ,&nbsp;María Vicent ,&nbsp;Carolina Gonzálvez ,&nbsp;María Pérez-Marco ,&nbsp;Lucía Granados-Alós ,&nbsp;Raquel Suriá","doi":"10.1016/j.psicod.2024.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of this study is to clarify the relationship between multidimensional perfectionism and academic self-efficacy in adolescents using a dual approach: variable-oriented and person-oriented. The sample consists of 1.375 students aged between 15 and 18 years (<em>M</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->16.36, <em>SD</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.04). The <em>Child and Adolescent Perfectionism Scale</em> and the <em>Perceived Self-Efficacy in Academic Situations Scale</em> are employed. Four perfectionist profiles as a result of the combination between <em>socially prescribed perfectionism</em> (SPP) and <em>self-oriented perfectionism</em> (SOP) are obtained using the <em>Latent Profile Analysis</em>: <em>very low perfectionism</em>, <em>low perfectionism</em>, <em>high perfectionism</em>, and <em>moderate perfectionism</em>. The <em>high perfectionism</em> group score significantly higher in academic self-efficacy than the others. Moreover, <em>post-hoc</em> comparisons show that there are statistically significant differences in academic self-efficacy between all profiles, with moderate to large effect sizes, except for those with <em>very low</em> and <em>low perfectionism</em>. Logistic regressions demonstrate that SOP and SPP positively and significantly predicted high scores in academic self-efficacy. Analysing ROC curves, it is found that both SOP and SPP have good and similar discriminative ability, correctly classifying 79% and 76% of participants with and without high levels of academic self-efficacy, respectively. Possible explanations and implications for Educational Psychology are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46733,"journal":{"name":"Revista De Psicodidactica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1136103424000029/pdfft?md5=3e8ba1402440f7a2c73a50abcce9a44b&pid=1-s2.0-S1136103424000029-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empleando análisis de perfiles y curvas ROC para examinar la relación entre el perfeccionismo y la autoeficacia académica en estudiantes de Educación Secundaria\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Fuster-Rico ,&nbsp;María Vicent ,&nbsp;Carolina Gonzálvez ,&nbsp;María Pérez-Marco ,&nbsp;Lucía Granados-Alós ,&nbsp;Raquel Suriá\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.psicod.2024.01.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The aim of this study is to clarify the relationship between multidimensional perfectionism and academic self-efficacy in adolescents using a dual approach: variable-oriented and person-oriented. The sample consists of 1.375 students aged between 15 and 18 years (<em>M</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->16.36, <em>SD</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.04). The <em>Child and Adolescent Perfectionism Scale</em> and the <em>Perceived Self-Efficacy in Academic Situations Scale</em> are employed. Four perfectionist profiles as a result of the combination between <em>socially prescribed perfectionism</em> (SPP) and <em>self-oriented perfectionism</em> (SOP) are obtained using the <em>Latent Profile Analysis</em>: <em>very low perfectionism</em>, <em>low perfectionism</em>, <em>high perfectionism</em>, and <em>moderate perfectionism</em>. The <em>high perfectionism</em> group score significantly higher in academic self-efficacy than the others. Moreover, <em>post-hoc</em> comparisons show that there are statistically significant differences in academic self-efficacy between all profiles, with moderate to large effect sizes, except for those with <em>very low</em> and <em>low perfectionism</em>. Logistic regressions demonstrate that SOP and SPP positively and significantly predicted high scores in academic self-efficacy. Analysing ROC curves, it is found that both SOP and SPP have good and similar discriminative ability, correctly classifying 79% and 76% of participants with and without high levels of academic self-efficacy, respectively. Possible explanations and implications for Educational Psychology are discussed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista De Psicodidactica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1136103424000029/pdfft?md5=3e8ba1402440f7a2c73a50abcce9a44b&pid=1-s2.0-S1136103424000029-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista De Psicodidactica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1136103424000029\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista De Psicodidactica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1136103424000029","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用变量导向和人本导向双重方法,旨在阐明青少年多维完美主义与学业自我效能感之间的关系。样本包括 1.375 名 15 至 18 岁的学生(男 = 16.36,女 = 1.04)。研究采用了儿童与青少年完美主义量表和学业情境自我效能感量表。通过潜伏特征分析,得出了由社会规定完美主义(SPP)和自我导向完美主义(SOP)组合而成的四种完美主义特征:极低完美主义、低完美主义、高完美主义和中等完美主义。高完美主义组的学业自我效能感得分明显高于其他组别。此外,事后比较显示,除极低完美主义和低完美主义组外,其他各组在学业自我效能感方面均存在统计学意义上的显著差异,效应大小为中等至较大。逻辑回归表明,SOP 和 SPP 对学业自我效能感的高分有积极和显著的预测作用。对 ROC 曲线进行分析后发现,SOP 和 SPP 都具有良好且相似的区分能力,能分别正确地将 79% 和 76% 具有和不具有高水平学业自我效能感的参与者分类。本文讨论了可能的解释和对教育心理学的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Empleando análisis de perfiles y curvas ROC para examinar la relación entre el perfeccionismo y la autoeficacia académica en estudiantes de Educación Secundaria

The aim of this study is to clarify the relationship between multidimensional perfectionism and academic self-efficacy in adolescents using a dual approach: variable-oriented and person-oriented. The sample consists of 1.375 students aged between 15 and 18 years (M = 16.36, SD = 1.04). The Child and Adolescent Perfectionism Scale and the Perceived Self-Efficacy in Academic Situations Scale are employed. Four perfectionist profiles as a result of the combination between socially prescribed perfectionism (SPP) and self-oriented perfectionism (SOP) are obtained using the Latent Profile Analysis: very low perfectionism, low perfectionism, high perfectionism, and moderate perfectionism. The high perfectionism group score significantly higher in academic self-efficacy than the others. Moreover, post-hoc comparisons show that there are statistically significant differences in academic self-efficacy between all profiles, with moderate to large effect sizes, except for those with very low and low perfectionism. Logistic regressions demonstrate that SOP and SPP positively and significantly predicted high scores in academic self-efficacy. Analysing ROC curves, it is found that both SOP and SPP have good and similar discriminative ability, correctly classifying 79% and 76% of participants with and without high levels of academic self-efficacy, respectively. Possible explanations and implications for Educational Psychology are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
18
审稿时长
35 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信