使用骨-髌腱-骨自体移植物进行前交叉韧带重建,同时进行外侧韧带半月板切除术或软骨成形术,与无外侧病变相比,不会导致运动和活动恢复能力下降

Q3 Medicine
Sean Hazzard P.A., M.B.A., Saoirse Connolly B.S., Brendan Fitzgerald B.S., Peter Asnis M.D.
{"title":"使用骨-髌腱-骨自体移植物进行前交叉韧带重建,同时进行外侧韧带半月板切除术或软骨成形术,与无外侧病变相比,不会导致运动和活动恢复能力下降","authors":"Sean Hazzard P.A., M.B.A.,&nbsp;Saoirse Connolly B.S.,&nbsp;Brendan Fitzgerald B.S.,&nbsp;Peter Asnis M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To investigate the influence of lateral meniscal and cartilage pathology on the outcome after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in patients who participate in pivoting sports.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using a single-surgeon patient registry, patients undergoing an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft were evaluated with minimum 2-year patient reported outcomes evaluated using Marx, Tegner, Lysholm, and International Knee Documentation Committee scales. Patients were divided into 3 groups: isolated ACL surgery, ACLR with a partial lateral meniscectomy, or a ACLR with partial lateral meniscectomy and lateral compartment chondroplasty.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 98 patients met inclusion criteria. Using the isolated ACL reconstruction group as a control, we found that Marx scores were greater in patients who additionally underwent a partial lateral meniscectomy at 1 year (<em>P</em> = .016). There were no significant differences between the ACL-only group and the ACL with partial lateral meniscectomy and chondroplasty group. Within the partial meniscectomy cohort comparing the patients with red-white zone tears with the patients with white-white zone tear, we found there were no significant differences when compared with the ACL-only control. There were no significant differences appreciated between groups using the International Knee Documentation Committee, Lysholm, and Tegner scales.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>ACL reconstruction using bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft with anteromedial portal drilling technique does not have any significant short-term (2-year outcome) differences in return to activity and patient-reported outcomes compared with if patients additionally have a partial lateral meniscectomy and/or lateral compartment chondroplasty. Additional partial lateral meniscectomy showed significantly greater Marx scores at 1 and 2 years’ postoperatively.</p></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><p>Level III, retrospective cohort study.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"6 3","pages":"Article 100910"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X24000282/pdfft?md5=588ff7456a47f300daf11f39c50406b1&pid=1-s2.0-S2666061X24000282-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone Autograft With Lateral Compartment Meniscectomy or Chondroplasty Does Not Lead to Decreased Return to Sport and Activity Compared With No Lateral Pathology\",\"authors\":\"Sean Hazzard P.A., M.B.A.,&nbsp;Saoirse Connolly B.S.,&nbsp;Brendan Fitzgerald B.S.,&nbsp;Peter Asnis M.D.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100910\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To investigate the influence of lateral meniscal and cartilage pathology on the outcome after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in patients who participate in pivoting sports.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using a single-surgeon patient registry, patients undergoing an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft were evaluated with minimum 2-year patient reported outcomes evaluated using Marx, Tegner, Lysholm, and International Knee Documentation Committee scales. Patients were divided into 3 groups: isolated ACL surgery, ACLR with a partial lateral meniscectomy, or a ACLR with partial lateral meniscectomy and lateral compartment chondroplasty.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 98 patients met inclusion criteria. Using the isolated ACL reconstruction group as a control, we found that Marx scores were greater in patients who additionally underwent a partial lateral meniscectomy at 1 year (<em>P</em> = .016). There were no significant differences between the ACL-only group and the ACL with partial lateral meniscectomy and chondroplasty group. Within the partial meniscectomy cohort comparing the patients with red-white zone tears with the patients with white-white zone tear, we found there were no significant differences when compared with the ACL-only control. There were no significant differences appreciated between groups using the International Knee Documentation Committee, Lysholm, and Tegner scales.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>ACL reconstruction using bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft with anteromedial portal drilling technique does not have any significant short-term (2-year outcome) differences in return to activity and patient-reported outcomes compared with if patients additionally have a partial lateral meniscectomy and/or lateral compartment chondroplasty. Additional partial lateral meniscectomy showed significantly greater Marx scores at 1 and 2 years’ postoperatively.</p></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><p>Level III, retrospective cohort study.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"6 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100910\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X24000282/pdfft?md5=588ff7456a47f300daf11f39c50406b1&pid=1-s2.0-S2666061X24000282-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X24000282\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X24000282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 探讨外侧半月板和软骨病变对参与枢轴运动的患者前交叉韧带(ACL)重建术后疗效的影响。方法 使用单个外科医生的患者登记册,对使用骨-髌腱-骨自体移植进行前交叉韧带重建术(ACLR)的患者进行评估,并使用Marx、Tegner、Lysholm和国际膝关节文献委员会的量表评估患者报告的至少2年疗效。患者被分为三组:孤立的前交叉韧带手术组、前交叉韧带重建加外侧半月板部分切除术组、前交叉韧带重建加外侧半月板部分切除术加外侧软骨成形术组。以孤立的前交叉韧带重建组为对照,我们发现,1年后接受部分外侧半月板切除术的患者马克思评分更高(P = .016)。单纯前交叉韧带组与前交叉韧带加部分外侧半月板切除术和软骨成形术组之间没有明显差异。在半月板部分切除术组中,我们将红白区撕裂患者与白白区撕裂患者进行了比较,发现与单纯前交叉韧带对照组相比没有明显差异。使用国际膝关节文献委员会(International Knee Documentation Committee)、Lysholm 和 Tegner 量表评估各组间的差异也不明显。结论使用骨-髌腱-骨自体移植物和前内侧门户钻孔技术进行前交叉韧带重建与同时进行部分外侧半月板切除术和/或外侧室软骨成形术的患者相比,在恢复活动能力和患者报告结果方面没有任何明显的短期(2 年结果)差异。额外的部分外侧半月板切除术在术后1年和2年显示出明显更高的马克思评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone Autograft With Lateral Compartment Meniscectomy or Chondroplasty Does Not Lead to Decreased Return to Sport and Activity Compared With No Lateral Pathology

Purpose

To investigate the influence of lateral meniscal and cartilage pathology on the outcome after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in patients who participate in pivoting sports.

Methods

Using a single-surgeon patient registry, patients undergoing an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft were evaluated with minimum 2-year patient reported outcomes evaluated using Marx, Tegner, Lysholm, and International Knee Documentation Committee scales. Patients were divided into 3 groups: isolated ACL surgery, ACLR with a partial lateral meniscectomy, or a ACLR with partial lateral meniscectomy and lateral compartment chondroplasty.

Results

A total of 98 patients met inclusion criteria. Using the isolated ACL reconstruction group as a control, we found that Marx scores were greater in patients who additionally underwent a partial lateral meniscectomy at 1 year (P = .016). There were no significant differences between the ACL-only group and the ACL with partial lateral meniscectomy and chondroplasty group. Within the partial meniscectomy cohort comparing the patients with red-white zone tears with the patients with white-white zone tear, we found there were no significant differences when compared with the ACL-only control. There were no significant differences appreciated between groups using the International Knee Documentation Committee, Lysholm, and Tegner scales.

Conclusions

ACL reconstruction using bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft with anteromedial portal drilling technique does not have any significant short-term (2-year outcome) differences in return to activity and patient-reported outcomes compared with if patients additionally have a partial lateral meniscectomy and/or lateral compartment chondroplasty. Additional partial lateral meniscectomy showed significantly greater Marx scores at 1 and 2 years’ postoperatively.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
218
审稿时长
45 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信