基于菌蛋白的肉类替代品与基于植物的肉类替代品相比对环境的影响:系统综述

IF 7.2 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Maria Shahid , Pankti Shah , Khanh Mach , Bibi Rodgers-Hunt , Tim Finnigan , Gary Frost , Bruce Neal , Michalis Hadjikakou
{"title":"基于菌蛋白的肉类替代品与基于植物的肉类替代品相比对环境的影响:系统综述","authors":"Maria Shahid ,&nbsp;Pankti Shah ,&nbsp;Khanh Mach ,&nbsp;Bibi Rodgers-Hunt ,&nbsp;Tim Finnigan ,&nbsp;Gary Frost ,&nbsp;Bruce Neal ,&nbsp;Michalis Hadjikakou","doi":"10.1016/j.fufo.2024.100410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Meat-based foods have significant environmental impacts that are lower for plant-based meat alternatives. Fungi-based mycoprotein offers another alternative to meat, but its comparative environmental impacts have not been comprehensively reviewed. We identified life cycle assessments (LCAs) of mycoprotein-based meat alternatives using ProQuest, Scopus and Web of Science, and the grey literature. Studies were included if they were published in the English language from 1 January 2013 until 18 September 2023, reported process-based LCAs with functional units by product weight, and reported any environmental impact measure, system boundary, or region. Data for mycoprotein was compared against plant-based meat alternatives for base-protein, burgers, mince and sausages, and against meats. Five LCAs of mycoprotein-based products were identified. Greenhouse gas emissions (GHGe) were lower for mycoprotein (0.73 kgCO2eq/kg) compared to soy (1.21 kgCO2eq/kg) or pea protein concentrate (1.91 kgCO2eq/kg). GHGe for mycoprotein-based product types were lower than or comparable to equivalent plant-based products, and lower compared to meat. GHGe from the ingredient production stage were generally lower for mycoprotein-based products compared to plant-based products. Further data are needed to compare land use and water scarcity impacts. Mycoprotein offers clear environmental advantages over meat, but distinctions between mycoprotein and plant-based alternatives require more comprehensive data.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34474,"journal":{"name":"Future Foods","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100410"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666833524001163/pdfft?md5=e046453dfb6d7a4d3bec1f408494585b&pid=1-s2.0-S2666833524001163-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The environmental impact of mycoprotein-based meat alternatives compared to plant-based meat alternatives: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Maria Shahid ,&nbsp;Pankti Shah ,&nbsp;Khanh Mach ,&nbsp;Bibi Rodgers-Hunt ,&nbsp;Tim Finnigan ,&nbsp;Gary Frost ,&nbsp;Bruce Neal ,&nbsp;Michalis Hadjikakou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fufo.2024.100410\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Meat-based foods have significant environmental impacts that are lower for plant-based meat alternatives. Fungi-based mycoprotein offers another alternative to meat, but its comparative environmental impacts have not been comprehensively reviewed. We identified life cycle assessments (LCAs) of mycoprotein-based meat alternatives using ProQuest, Scopus and Web of Science, and the grey literature. Studies were included if they were published in the English language from 1 January 2013 until 18 September 2023, reported process-based LCAs with functional units by product weight, and reported any environmental impact measure, system boundary, or region. Data for mycoprotein was compared against plant-based meat alternatives for base-protein, burgers, mince and sausages, and against meats. Five LCAs of mycoprotein-based products were identified. Greenhouse gas emissions (GHGe) were lower for mycoprotein (0.73 kgCO2eq/kg) compared to soy (1.21 kgCO2eq/kg) or pea protein concentrate (1.91 kgCO2eq/kg). GHGe for mycoprotein-based product types were lower than or comparable to equivalent plant-based products, and lower compared to meat. GHGe from the ingredient production stage were generally lower for mycoprotein-based products compared to plant-based products. Further data are needed to compare land use and water scarcity impacts. Mycoprotein offers clear environmental advantages over meat, but distinctions between mycoprotein and plant-based alternatives require more comprehensive data.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future Foods\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100410\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666833524001163/pdfft?md5=e046453dfb6d7a4d3bec1f408494585b&pid=1-s2.0-S2666833524001163-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future Foods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666833524001163\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Foods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666833524001163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肉类食品对环境的影响很大,而以植物为基础的肉类替代品对环境的影响较小。以真菌为基础的菌体蛋白提供了另一种肉类替代品,但其对环境影响的比较尚未得到全面审查。我们利用 ProQuest、Scopus 和 Web of Science 以及灰色文献,确定了基于真菌蛋白的肉类替代品的生命周期评估(LCA)。如果研究是在 2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 9 月 18 日期间以英文发表的,报告了以产品重量为功能单位的基于过程的生命周期评估,并报告了任何环境影响措施、系统边界或区域,则将其纳入研究范围。菌体蛋白的数据与植物肉类替代品的基础蛋白、汉堡、肉馅和香肠以及肉类进行了比较。确定了五种基于菌蛋白产品的生命周期评估。与大豆(1.21 kgCO2eq/kg)或豌豆浓缩蛋白(1.91 kgCO2eq/kg)相比,霉菌蛋白的温室气体排放量(GHGe)较低(0.73 kgCO2eq/kg)。霉菌蛋白类产品的温室气体当量低于同等植物类产品或与之相当,也低于肉类。与植物性产品相比,霉菌蛋白类产品配料生产阶段产生的温室气体当量普遍较低。需要更多数据来比较土地利用和水资源短缺的影响。与肉类相比,霉菌蛋白具有明显的环境优势,但要区分霉菌蛋白和植物基替代品,还需要更全面的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The environmental impact of mycoprotein-based meat alternatives compared to plant-based meat alternatives: A systematic review

Meat-based foods have significant environmental impacts that are lower for plant-based meat alternatives. Fungi-based mycoprotein offers another alternative to meat, but its comparative environmental impacts have not been comprehensively reviewed. We identified life cycle assessments (LCAs) of mycoprotein-based meat alternatives using ProQuest, Scopus and Web of Science, and the grey literature. Studies were included if they were published in the English language from 1 January 2013 until 18 September 2023, reported process-based LCAs with functional units by product weight, and reported any environmental impact measure, system boundary, or region. Data for mycoprotein was compared against plant-based meat alternatives for base-protein, burgers, mince and sausages, and against meats. Five LCAs of mycoprotein-based products were identified. Greenhouse gas emissions (GHGe) were lower for mycoprotein (0.73 kgCO2eq/kg) compared to soy (1.21 kgCO2eq/kg) or pea protein concentrate (1.91 kgCO2eq/kg). GHGe for mycoprotein-based product types were lower than or comparable to equivalent plant-based products, and lower compared to meat. GHGe from the ingredient production stage were generally lower for mycoprotein-based products compared to plant-based products. Further data are needed to compare land use and water scarcity impacts. Mycoprotein offers clear environmental advantages over meat, but distinctions between mycoprotein and plant-based alternatives require more comprehensive data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Future Foods
Future Foods Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
97
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信