COVID-19 嗅觉功能障碍:应对方法、生活质量和心理健康之间的关联。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Rhinology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.4193/Rhin23.356
P T Jacobson, B J Vilarello, C Snyder, T-H Choo, F F Caruana, L W Gallagher, J P Tervo, J B Gary, T M Saak, D A Gudis, P V Joseph, T E Goldberg, D P Devanand, J B Overdevest
{"title":"COVID-19 嗅觉功能障碍:应对方法、生活质量和心理健康之间的关联。","authors":"P T Jacobson, B J Vilarello, C Snyder, T-H Choo, F F Caruana, L W Gallagher, J P Tervo, J B Gary, T M Saak, D A Gudis, P V Joseph, T E Goldberg, D P Devanand, J B Overdevest","doi":"10.4193/Rhin23.356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Persistent olfactory dysfunction (OD) is a common symptom following SARS-CoV-2 infection that can greatly impact quality of life (QoL). Because coping strategies have been shown to moderate the effect of disease symptoms on functional and affective outcomes, this study aims to determine whether specific coping strategies are associated with and moderate QoL outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Participants with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection underwent psychophysical olfactory testing with Sniffin’ Sticks and completed questionnaires to elicit subjective olfactory function, coping strategies, olfactory-specific QoL, general QoL, and mental health.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 93 participants included in the study. Olfactory specific QoL scores were significantly worse among individuals with subjective and psychophysically measured OD compared to those with subjective and psychophysically confirmed normosmia. Olfactory-specific QoL, general QoL, and anxiety symptom scores were positively correlated with avoidant and disengagement coping among individuals with subjective and psychophysically measured OD. Depression symptom scores were positively correlated with avoidant and disengagement coping and negatively correlated with approach and engagement coping. There were no significant moderating effects on the association between olfactory performance and QoL or mental health screening assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Approach and engagement coping mechanisms are associated with improved depression, whereas avoidant and disengagement coping tracks with worse QoL and mental health screening assessment, offering an opportunity to counsel patients accordingly.</p>","PeriodicalId":21361,"journal":{"name":"Rhinology","volume":" ","pages":"526-536"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19 olfactory dysfunction: associations between coping, quality of life, and mental health.\",\"authors\":\"P T Jacobson, B J Vilarello, C Snyder, T-H Choo, F F Caruana, L W Gallagher, J P Tervo, J B Gary, T M Saak, D A Gudis, P V Joseph, T E Goldberg, D P Devanand, J B Overdevest\",\"doi\":\"10.4193/Rhin23.356\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Persistent olfactory dysfunction (OD) is a common symptom following SARS-CoV-2 infection that can greatly impact quality of life (QoL). Because coping strategies have been shown to moderate the effect of disease symptoms on functional and affective outcomes, this study aims to determine whether specific coping strategies are associated with and moderate QoL outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Participants with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection underwent psychophysical olfactory testing with Sniffin’ Sticks and completed questionnaires to elicit subjective olfactory function, coping strategies, olfactory-specific QoL, general QoL, and mental health.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 93 participants included in the study. Olfactory specific QoL scores were significantly worse among individuals with subjective and psychophysically measured OD compared to those with subjective and psychophysically confirmed normosmia. Olfactory-specific QoL, general QoL, and anxiety symptom scores were positively correlated with avoidant and disengagement coping among individuals with subjective and psychophysically measured OD. Depression symptom scores were positively correlated with avoidant and disengagement coping and negatively correlated with approach and engagement coping. There were no significant moderating effects on the association between olfactory performance and QoL or mental health screening assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Approach and engagement coping mechanisms are associated with improved depression, whereas avoidant and disengagement coping tracks with worse QoL and mental health screening assessment, offering an opportunity to counsel patients accordingly.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rhinology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"526-536\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rhinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin23.356\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin23.356","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:持续性嗅觉功能障碍(OD)是感染 SARS-CoV-2 后出现的一种常见症状,会严重影响生活质量(QoL)。由于应对策略已被证明能缓和疾病症状对功能和情感结果的影响,本研究旨在确定特定的应对策略是否与 QoL 结果相关并能缓和 QoL 结果:曾感染过 SARS-CoV-2 的参与者接受了嗅棒心理物理嗅觉测试,并填写了调查问卷,以了解主观嗅觉功能、应对策略、嗅觉特异性 QoL、一般 QoL 和心理健康情况:共有 93 人参与了研究。与主观和心理物理学证实的正常嗅觉症患者相比,主观和心理物理学测量的正常嗅觉症患者的嗅觉特异性 QoL 得分明显较低。在主观和心理物理测量的 OD 患者中,嗅觉特异性 QoL、一般 QoL 和焦虑症状得分与回避和脱离应对呈正相关。抑郁症状评分与回避和脱离应对呈正相关,与接近和参与应对呈负相关。嗅觉表现与 QoL 或心理健康筛查评估之间没有明显的调节作用:结论:接近型和参与型应对机制与抑郁症的改善有关,而回避型和脱离型应对机制则与更差的 QoL 和心理健康筛查评估有关,这为向患者提供相应的咨询提供了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COVID-19 olfactory dysfunction: associations between coping, quality of life, and mental health.

Background: Persistent olfactory dysfunction (OD) is a common symptom following SARS-CoV-2 infection that can greatly impact quality of life (QoL). Because coping strategies have been shown to moderate the effect of disease symptoms on functional and affective outcomes, this study aims to determine whether specific coping strategies are associated with and moderate QoL outcomes.

Methodology: Participants with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection underwent psychophysical olfactory testing with Sniffin’ Sticks and completed questionnaires to elicit subjective olfactory function, coping strategies, olfactory-specific QoL, general QoL, and mental health.

Results: There were 93 participants included in the study. Olfactory specific QoL scores were significantly worse among individuals with subjective and psychophysically measured OD compared to those with subjective and psychophysically confirmed normosmia. Olfactory-specific QoL, general QoL, and anxiety symptom scores were positively correlated with avoidant and disengagement coping among individuals with subjective and psychophysically measured OD. Depression symptom scores were positively correlated with avoidant and disengagement coping and negatively correlated with approach and engagement coping. There were no significant moderating effects on the association between olfactory performance and QoL or mental health screening assessment.

Conclusions: Approach and engagement coping mechanisms are associated with improved depression, whereas avoidant and disengagement coping tracks with worse QoL and mental health screening assessment, offering an opportunity to counsel patients accordingly.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rhinology
Rhinology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
15.80
自引率
9.70%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Rhinology serves as the official Journal of the International Rhinologic Society and is recognized as one of the journals of the European Rhinologic Society. It offers a prominent platform for disseminating rhinologic research, reviews, position papers, task force reports, and guidelines to an international scientific audience. The journal also boasts the prestigious European Position Paper in Rhinosinusitis (EPOS), a highly influential publication first released in 2005 and subsequently updated in 2007, 2012, and most recently in 2020. Employing a double-blind peer review system, Rhinology welcomes original articles, review articles, and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信