[基于问卷的心理调查方法对患者群体评估结果的影响]。

Q4 Medicine
Yue-Yao Xu, Wen-Wen Chen, Ling Li, Li Yuan, Meng-Xian Huang, Yuan-Yuan Qu, Huan Song, Jian-Wei Zhu
{"title":"[基于问卷的心理调查方法对患者群体评估结果的影响]。","authors":"Yue-Yao Xu, Wen-Wen Chen, Ling Li, Li Yuan, Meng-Xian Huang, Yuan-Yuan Qu, Huan Song, Jian-Wei Zhu","doi":"10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.15839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective To assess the influences of self-and interviewer-administered methods on the scores of anxiety and depression questionnaires among the patients with sports injuries.Methods A total of 532 participants with sports injuries treated in the Sports Medicine Center of West China Hospital,Sichuan University from November 2022 to May 2023 were included.They were randomly assigned to either the interviewer-administered group (<i>n</i>=270) or the self-administered group (<i>n</i>=262) to complete the generalized anxiety disorder (GAD-7) and the patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9) scales.The total scores and prevalence rates of anxiety and depression were compared between the two groups.Results There was no statistically significant difference in gender,occupation,or surgical site between the two groups (all <i>P</i>>0.05).The self-administered group had higher scores of GAD-7 and PHQ-9 scales than the interviewer-administered group (<i>P</i><0.001,<i>P</i><0.001).A greater proportion of participants in the self-administered group than in the interview-administered group met the criteria for mild to moderate anxiety and depression (<i>P</i><0.001,<i>P</i>=0.002).The prevalence rates of moderate to severe anxiety (GAD-7≥10) and depression (PHQ-9≥10) showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups (<i>P</i>=0.761,<i>P</i>=0.086).Conclusion This study demonstrates that the participants in the self-administered group are more likely to report mild to moderate symptoms of anxiety and depression than those in the interviewer-administered group.</p>","PeriodicalId":6919,"journal":{"name":"中国医学科学院学报","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Effects of Questionnaire-Based Psychological Survey Methods on the Evaluation Results in a Patient Cohort].\",\"authors\":\"Yue-Yao Xu, Wen-Wen Chen, Ling Li, Li Yuan, Meng-Xian Huang, Yuan-Yuan Qu, Huan Song, Jian-Wei Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.15839\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Objective To assess the influences of self-and interviewer-administered methods on the scores of anxiety and depression questionnaires among the patients with sports injuries.Methods A total of 532 participants with sports injuries treated in the Sports Medicine Center of West China Hospital,Sichuan University from November 2022 to May 2023 were included.They were randomly assigned to either the interviewer-administered group (<i>n</i>=270) or the self-administered group (<i>n</i>=262) to complete the generalized anxiety disorder (GAD-7) and the patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9) scales.The total scores and prevalence rates of anxiety and depression were compared between the two groups.Results There was no statistically significant difference in gender,occupation,or surgical site between the two groups (all <i>P</i>>0.05).The self-administered group had higher scores of GAD-7 and PHQ-9 scales than the interviewer-administered group (<i>P</i><0.001,<i>P</i><0.001).A greater proportion of participants in the self-administered group than in the interview-administered group met the criteria for mild to moderate anxiety and depression (<i>P</i><0.001,<i>P</i>=0.002).The prevalence rates of moderate to severe anxiety (GAD-7≥10) and depression (PHQ-9≥10) showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups (<i>P</i>=0.761,<i>P</i>=0.086).Conclusion This study demonstrates that the participants in the self-administered group are more likely to report mild to moderate symptoms of anxiety and depression than those in the interviewer-administered group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6919,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国医学科学院学报\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国医学科学院学报\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.15839\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国医学科学院学报","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.15839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

方法 选取2022年11月至2023年5月在四川大学华西医院运动医学中心接受治疗的532名运动损伤患者为研究对象。随机分为访谈组(270 人)和自填组(262 人),分别完成广泛性焦虑症(GAD-7)和患者健康问卷(PHQ-9)量表,比较两组患者的焦虑和抑郁总分及患病率。结果 两组患者在性别、职业、手术部位等方面的差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05),自填组的GAD-7和PHQ-9量表得分高于访谈者自填组(PPPP=0.002)。中度至重度焦虑(GAD-7≥10)和抑郁(PHQ-9≥10)的患病率在两组之间无统计学显著差异(P=0.761,P=0.086)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Effects of Questionnaire-Based Psychological Survey Methods on the Evaluation Results in a Patient Cohort].

Objective To assess the influences of self-and interviewer-administered methods on the scores of anxiety and depression questionnaires among the patients with sports injuries.Methods A total of 532 participants with sports injuries treated in the Sports Medicine Center of West China Hospital,Sichuan University from November 2022 to May 2023 were included.They were randomly assigned to either the interviewer-administered group (n=270) or the self-administered group (n=262) to complete the generalized anxiety disorder (GAD-7) and the patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9) scales.The total scores and prevalence rates of anxiety and depression were compared between the two groups.Results There was no statistically significant difference in gender,occupation,or surgical site between the two groups (all P>0.05).The self-administered group had higher scores of GAD-7 and PHQ-9 scales than the interviewer-administered group (P<0.001,P<0.001).A greater proportion of participants in the self-administered group than in the interview-administered group met the criteria for mild to moderate anxiety and depression (P<0.001,P=0.002).The prevalence rates of moderate to severe anxiety (GAD-7≥10) and depression (PHQ-9≥10) showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P=0.761,P=0.086).Conclusion This study demonstrates that the participants in the self-administered group are more likely to report mild to moderate symptoms of anxiety and depression than those in the interviewer-administered group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中国医学科学院学报
中国医学科学院学报 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6813
期刊介绍: Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae was founded in February 1979. It is a comprehensive medical academic journal published in China and abroad, supervised by the Ministry of Health of the People's Republic of China and sponsored by the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College. The journal mainly reports the latest research results, work progress and dynamics in the fields of basic medicine, clinical medicine, pharmacy, preventive medicine, biomedicine, medical teaching and research, aiming to promote the exchange of medical information and improve the academic level of medicine. At present, the journal has been included in 10 famous foreign retrieval systems and their databases [Medline (PubMed online version), Elsevier, EMBASE, CA, WPRIM, ExtraMED, IC, JST, UPD and EBSCO-ASP]; and has been included in important domestic retrieval systems and databases [China Science Citation Database (Documentation and Information Center of the Chinese Academy of Sciences), China Core Journals Overview (Peking University Library), China Science and Technology Paper Statistical Source Database (China Science and Technology Core Journals) (China Institute of Scientific and Technological Information), China Science and Technology Journal Paper and Citation Database (China Institute of Scientific and Technological Information)].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信