提高诊断精确度:对两个中心进行的磁共振引导乳腺活检的比较分析。

Polish journal of radiology Pub Date : 2024-05-10 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.5114/pjr/186862
Sylwia Heinze, Wojciech Krzysztof Rudnicki, Joanna Paluchowska, Joanna Szpor, Elżbieta Łuczyńska
{"title":"提高诊断精确度:对两个中心进行的磁共振引导乳腺活检的比较分析。","authors":"Sylwia Heinze, Wojciech Krzysztof Rudnicki, Joanna Paluchowska, Joanna Szpor, Elżbieta Łuczyńska","doi":"10.5114/pjr/186862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Breast lesions that remain elusive in traditional imaging techniques such as ultrasound and mammography pose a diagnostic challenge. In such cases, magnetic resonance (MR)-guided breast biopsy emerges as a crucial tool for accurate histopathological verification. This article presents a comparative study conducted at 2 centres, exploring the results of MR-guided breast biopsies performed by experienced radiologists, based on inside and external referrals.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study involved 228 patients, 120 of whom underwent biopsies at Centre 1, where the same radiologist performed both the qualification and biopsy. The remaining 108 patients were biopsied at Centre 2, based on referrals from different institutions. Uniform examination protocols were adopted at both centres, and all biopsies underwent histopathological verification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The distribution of lesion types was found to be independent of the apparatus used for biopsies (<i>p</i> = 0.759). Interestingly, Centre 1 exhibited a higher prevalence of infiltrating carcinomas compared to Centre 2 (<i>p</i> = 0.12). Furthermore, the analysis demonstrated a significant variance in the nature of the lesions in relation to breast structure and biopsy centre (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MR-guided breast biopsy serves as a remarkable tool for verifying lesions that evade detection through conventional imaging methods and physical examinations. The study findings underscore the crucial role of radiologist experience in determining the efficacy of MR-guided breast biopsies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94174,"journal":{"name":"Polish journal of radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11210378/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing diagnostic precision: comparative analysis of MR-guided breast biopsies performed in two centres.\",\"authors\":\"Sylwia Heinze, Wojciech Krzysztof Rudnicki, Joanna Paluchowska, Joanna Szpor, Elżbieta Łuczyńska\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/pjr/186862\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Breast lesions that remain elusive in traditional imaging techniques such as ultrasound and mammography pose a diagnostic challenge. In such cases, magnetic resonance (MR)-guided breast biopsy emerges as a crucial tool for accurate histopathological verification. This article presents a comparative study conducted at 2 centres, exploring the results of MR-guided breast biopsies performed by experienced radiologists, based on inside and external referrals.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study involved 228 patients, 120 of whom underwent biopsies at Centre 1, where the same radiologist performed both the qualification and biopsy. The remaining 108 patients were biopsied at Centre 2, based on referrals from different institutions. Uniform examination protocols were adopted at both centres, and all biopsies underwent histopathological verification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The distribution of lesion types was found to be independent of the apparatus used for biopsies (<i>p</i> = 0.759). Interestingly, Centre 1 exhibited a higher prevalence of infiltrating carcinomas compared to Centre 2 (<i>p</i> = 0.12). Furthermore, the analysis demonstrated a significant variance in the nature of the lesions in relation to breast structure and biopsy centre (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MR-guided breast biopsy serves as a remarkable tool for verifying lesions that evade detection through conventional imaging methods and physical examinations. The study findings underscore the crucial role of radiologist experience in determining the efficacy of MR-guided breast biopsies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polish journal of radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11210378/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polish journal of radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr/186862\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish journal of radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr/186862","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:传统成像技术(如超声波和乳房 X 线照相术)无法发现的乳腺病变给诊断带来了挑战。在这种情况下,磁共振(MR)引导下的乳腺活检成为准确进行组织病理学验证的重要工具。本文介绍了在两个中心进行的一项比较研究,探讨了由经验丰富的放射科医生根据内部和外部转诊进行磁共振引导乳腺活检的结果:研究涉及 228 名患者,其中 120 人在第一中心进行了活检,由同一位放射科医生进行资格鉴定和活检。其余 108 名患者在第二中心接受活检,活检由不同机构转介。两个中心采用统一的检查方案,所有活组织检查均经过组织病理学验证:结果发现,病变类型的分布与活检所用仪器无关(p = 0.759)。有趣的是,与第二中心相比,第一中心的浸润癌发病率更高(p = 0.12)。此外,分析表明病变性质与乳房结构和活检中心的关系存在显著差异(p < 0.001):结论:磁共振引导下的乳腺活组织检查是一种重要的工具,可用于核实通过传统成像方法和体格检查无法发现的病变。研究结果强调了放射科医生的经验在决定磁共振引导下乳腺活检疗效方面的关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing diagnostic precision: comparative analysis of MR-guided breast biopsies performed in two centres.

Purpose: Breast lesions that remain elusive in traditional imaging techniques such as ultrasound and mammography pose a diagnostic challenge. In such cases, magnetic resonance (MR)-guided breast biopsy emerges as a crucial tool for accurate histopathological verification. This article presents a comparative study conducted at 2 centres, exploring the results of MR-guided breast biopsies performed by experienced radiologists, based on inside and external referrals.

Material and methods: The study involved 228 patients, 120 of whom underwent biopsies at Centre 1, where the same radiologist performed both the qualification and biopsy. The remaining 108 patients were biopsied at Centre 2, based on referrals from different institutions. Uniform examination protocols were adopted at both centres, and all biopsies underwent histopathological verification.

Results: The distribution of lesion types was found to be independent of the apparatus used for biopsies (p = 0.759). Interestingly, Centre 1 exhibited a higher prevalence of infiltrating carcinomas compared to Centre 2 (p = 0.12). Furthermore, the analysis demonstrated a significant variance in the nature of the lesions in relation to breast structure and biopsy centre (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: MR-guided breast biopsy serves as a remarkable tool for verifying lesions that evade detection through conventional imaging methods and physical examinations. The study findings underscore the crucial role of radiologist experience in determining the efficacy of MR-guided breast biopsies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信