非负重和负重情况下踝关节巩膜超声波评估方法的比较。

IF 1.9 3区医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS

Foot and Ankle Surgery Pub Date : 2024-06-25 DOI:10.1016/j.fas.2024.06.002

Takuji Yokoe, Fan Yang, Takuya Tajima, Nami Yamaguchi, Yudai Morita, Etsuo Chosa

{"title":"非负重和负重情况下踝关节巩膜超声波评估方法的比较。","authors":"Takuji Yokoe, Fan Yang, Takuya Tajima, Nami Yamaguchi, Yudai Morita, Etsuo Chosa","doi":"10.1016/j.fas.2024.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study aimed to investigate ankle syndesmosis in healthy subjects under non-weight bearing (NWB) and weight bearing (WB) conditions using two US methods.Methods: The anterior tibiofibular clear space (ATFCS) was measured in healthy subjects in NWB and WB conditions using two US procedures. Method 1 measured 10 mm above the ankle joint and Method 2 measured 30° from the line of 10 mm above the ankle joint.Results: A total of 60 ankles from 30 subjects (male/female, 15/15) were included. There was a significant difference in the ATFCS between the two US methods (p < 0.001), and Method 2 was better at detecting the change in diastasis from NWB to WB conditions. The ATFCS was significantly greater on WB than on NWB, irrespective of the US method.Conclusions: Method 2 was better at detecting diastasis of the syndesmosis from NWB to WB conditions. The influence of WB needs to be considered when evaluating syndesmosis using US.Level of evidence: Cross-sectional cohort study; Level of evidence, Ⅳ.","PeriodicalId":48743,"journal":{"name":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of ultrasonographic evaluation methods for ankle syndesmosis in non-weight bearing and weight bearing conditions.\",\"authors\":\"Takuji Yokoe, Fan Yang, Takuya Tajima, Nami Yamaguchi, Yudai Morita, Etsuo Chosa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fas.2024.06.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: This study aimed to investigate ankle syndesmosis in healthy subjects under non-weight bearing (NWB) and weight bearing (WB) conditions using two US methods.Methods: The anterior tibiofibular clear space (ATFCS) was measured in healthy subjects in NWB and WB conditions using two US procedures. Method 1 measured 10 mm above the ankle joint and Method 2 measured 30° from the line of 10 mm above the ankle joint.Results: A total of 60 ankles from 30 subjects (male/female, 15/15) were included. There was a significant difference in the ATFCS between the two US methods (p < 0.001), and Method 2 was better at detecting the change in diastasis from NWB to WB conditions. The ATFCS was significantly greater on WB than on NWB, irrespective of the US method.Conclusions: Method 2 was better at detecting diastasis of the syndesmosis from NWB to WB conditions. The influence of WB needs to be considered when evaluating syndesmosis using US.Level of evidence: Cross-sectional cohort study; Level of evidence, Ⅳ.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foot and Ankle Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foot and Ankle Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2024.06.002\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2024.06.002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

背景：本研究旨在使用两种 US 方法研究健康受试者在非负重（NWB）和负重（WB）条件下的踝关节联合：本研究旨在使用两种 US 方法调查健康受试者在非负重（NWB）和负重（WB）条件下的踝关节巩膜情况：方法：采用两种 US 方法测量健康受试者在非负重（NWB）和负重（WB）条件下的胫腓骨前间隙（ATFCS）。方法 1 在踝关节上方 10 毫米处测量，方法 2 从踝关节上方 10 毫米处开始测量 30°：结果：共纳入了 30 名受试者（男性/女性，15/15）的 60 只脚踝。两种 US 方法的 ATFCS 值有明显差异（p 结论：方法 2 更能检测出踝关节的畸形：方法 2 更好地检测了从 NWB 到 WB 条件下的腓骨联合松弛。在使用 US 评估巩膜松弛时需要考虑 WB 的影响：横断面队列研究；证据等级Ⅳ。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Comparison of ultrasonographic evaluation methods for ankle syndesmosis in non-weight bearing and weight bearing conditions.

Background: This study aimed to investigate ankle syndesmosis in healthy subjects under non-weight bearing (NWB) and weight bearing (WB) conditions using two US methods.

Methods: The anterior tibiofibular clear space (ATFCS) was measured in healthy subjects in NWB and WB conditions using two US procedures. Method 1 measured 10 mm above the ankle joint and Method 2 measured 30° from the line of 10 mm above the ankle joint.

Results: A total of 60 ankles from 30 subjects (male/female, 15/15) were included. There was a significant difference in the ATFCS between the two US methods (p < 0.001), and Method 2 was better at detecting the change in diastasis from NWB to WB conditions. The ATFCS was significantly greater on WB than on NWB, irrespective of the US method.

Conclusions: Method 2 was better at detecting diastasis of the syndesmosis from NWB to WB conditions. The influence of WB needs to be considered when evaluating syndesmosis using US.

Level of evidence: Cross-sectional cohort study; Level of evidence, Ⅳ.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Foot and Ankle Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-

CiteScore

4.60

自引率

16.00%

发文量

202

期刊介绍： Foot and Ankle Surgery is essential reading for everyone interested in the foot and ankle and its disorders. The approach is broad and includes all aspects of the subject from basic science to clinical management. Problems of both children and adults are included, as is trauma and chronic disease. Foot and Ankle Surgery is the official journal of European Foot and Ankle Society. The aims of this journal are to promote the art and science of ankle and foot surgery, to publish peer-reviewed research articles, to provide regular reviews by acknowledged experts on common problems, and to provide a forum for discussion with letters to the Editors. Reviews of books are also published. Papers are invited for possible publication in Foot and Ankle Surgery on the understanding that the material has not been published elsewhere or accepted for publication in another journal and does not infringe prior copyright.