在社会变革时期领导医疗机构:对首席执行官的定性研究。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of General Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-27 DOI:10.1007/s11606-024-08790-y
Kerry K Meltzer, Zoe Bouchelle, Jaideep S Grewal, Kevin B Mahoney, David T Grande
{"title":"在社会变革时期领导医疗机构:对首席执行官的定性研究。","authors":"Kerry K Meltzer, Zoe Bouchelle, Jaideep S Grewal, Kevin B Mahoney, David T Grande","doi":"10.1007/s11606-024-08790-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent years, organizational leaders have faced growing pressure to respond to social and political issues. Although previous research has examined the experiences of corporate CEOs engaging in these issues, less is known about the perspectives of healthcare leaders.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the experiences of healthcare CEOs engaging in health-related social and political issues, with a specific focus on systemic racism and abortion policy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews from February to July 2023.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>CEOs of US-based hospitals or health systems.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>One-on-one interviews which were audio recorded, professionally transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>This study included 25 CEOs of US-based hospitals or health systems. Almost half were between ages 60 and 69 (12 [48%]), 19 identified as male (76%), and 20 identified as White (80%). Approximately half self-identified as Democrats (13 [55%]). Most hospitals and health systems were private non-profits (15 [60%]). The interviews organized around four domains: (1) Perspectives on their Role, (2) Factors Impacting Engagement, (3) Improving Engagement, and (4) Experiences Responding to Recent Polarizing Events. Within these four domains, nine themes emerged. CEOs described increasing pressure to engage and had mixed feelings about their role. They identified personal, organizational, and political factors that affect their engagement. CEOs identified strategies to measure the success of their engagement and also reflected on their experiences speaking out about systemic racism and abortion legislation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this qualitative study, healthcare CEOs described mixed perspectives on their role engaging in social and political issues and identified several factors impacting engagement. CEOs cited few strategies to measure the success of their engagement. Given that healthcare leaders are increasingly asked to address policy debates, more work is needed to examine the role and impact of healthcare CEOs engaging in health-related social and political issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2755-2761"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11535131/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leading a Healthcare Organization During a Period of Social Change: A Qualitative Study of Chief Executive Officers.\",\"authors\":\"Kerry K Meltzer, Zoe Bouchelle, Jaideep S Grewal, Kevin B Mahoney, David T Grande\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11606-024-08790-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent years, organizational leaders have faced growing pressure to respond to social and political issues. Although previous research has examined the experiences of corporate CEOs engaging in these issues, less is known about the perspectives of healthcare leaders.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the experiences of healthcare CEOs engaging in health-related social and political issues, with a specific focus on systemic racism and abortion policy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews from February to July 2023.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>CEOs of US-based hospitals or health systems.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>One-on-one interviews which were audio recorded, professionally transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>This study included 25 CEOs of US-based hospitals or health systems. Almost half were between ages 60 and 69 (12 [48%]), 19 identified as male (76%), and 20 identified as White (80%). Approximately half self-identified as Democrats (13 [55%]). Most hospitals and health systems were private non-profits (15 [60%]). The interviews organized around four domains: (1) Perspectives on their Role, (2) Factors Impacting Engagement, (3) Improving Engagement, and (4) Experiences Responding to Recent Polarizing Events. Within these four domains, nine themes emerged. CEOs described increasing pressure to engage and had mixed feelings about their role. They identified personal, organizational, and political factors that affect their engagement. CEOs identified strategies to measure the success of their engagement and also reflected on their experiences speaking out about systemic racism and abortion legislation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this qualitative study, healthcare CEOs described mixed perspectives on their role engaging in social and political issues and identified several factors impacting engagement. CEOs cited few strategies to measure the success of their engagement. Given that healthcare leaders are increasingly asked to address policy debates, more work is needed to examine the role and impact of healthcare CEOs engaging in health-related social and political issues.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2755-2761\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11535131/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-08790-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-08790-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:近年来,组织领导者在应对社会和政治问题时面临着越来越大的压力。尽管以往的研究已经考察了企业首席执行官在这些问题上的经验,但对医疗保健领导者的观点却知之甚少:探讨医疗保健行业首席执行官参与与医疗保健相关的社会和政治问题的经验,尤其关注系统性种族主义和堕胎政策:设计:2023 年 2 月至 7 月,采用半结构式访谈进行定性研究:美国医院或医疗系统的首席执行官:方法:一对一访谈,对访谈进行录音、专业转录,并使用主题分析法进行分析:这项研究包括 25 位美国医院或医疗系统的首席执行官。近一半的人年龄在 60 岁至 69 岁之间(12 [48%]),19 人认为自己是男性(76%),20 人认为自己是白人(80%)。大约一半的人自认为是民主党人(13 [55%])。大多数医院和医疗系统为私营非营利机构(15 [60%])。访谈围绕四个领域展开:(1) 对自身角色的看法,(2) 影响参与度的因素,(3) 提高参与度,以及 (4) 应对近期两极分化事件的经验。在这四个领域中,出现了九个主题。首席执行官们描述了越来越大的参与压力,并对自己的角色褒贬不一。他们指出了影响其参与的个人、组织和政治因素。首席执行官们确定了衡量其参与成功与否的策略,还反思了他们就系统性种族主义和堕胎立法发表意见的经历:在这项定性研究中,医疗保健行业的首席执行官们对他们在参与社会和政治事务中所扮演的角色持不同观点,并指出了影响参与的几个因素。首席执行官们很少提及衡量其参与成功与否的策略。鉴于医疗保健行业的领导者越来越多地被要求参与政策辩论,我们需要做更多的工作来研究医疗保健行业首席执行官参与与医疗保健相关的社会和政治问题的作用和影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Leading a Healthcare Organization During a Period of Social Change: A Qualitative Study of Chief Executive Officers.

Leading a Healthcare Organization During a Period of Social Change: A Qualitative Study of Chief Executive Officers.

Background: In recent years, organizational leaders have faced growing pressure to respond to social and political issues. Although previous research has examined the experiences of corporate CEOs engaging in these issues, less is known about the perspectives of healthcare leaders.

Objective: To explore the experiences of healthcare CEOs engaging in health-related social and political issues, with a specific focus on systemic racism and abortion policy.

Design: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews from February to July 2023.

Participants: CEOs of US-based hospitals or health systems.

Approach: One-on-one interviews which were audio recorded, professionally transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis.

Key results: This study included 25 CEOs of US-based hospitals or health systems. Almost half were between ages 60 and 69 (12 [48%]), 19 identified as male (76%), and 20 identified as White (80%). Approximately half self-identified as Democrats (13 [55%]). Most hospitals and health systems were private non-profits (15 [60%]). The interviews organized around four domains: (1) Perspectives on their Role, (2) Factors Impacting Engagement, (3) Improving Engagement, and (4) Experiences Responding to Recent Polarizing Events. Within these four domains, nine themes emerged. CEOs described increasing pressure to engage and had mixed feelings about their role. They identified personal, organizational, and political factors that affect their engagement. CEOs identified strategies to measure the success of their engagement and also reflected on their experiences speaking out about systemic racism and abortion legislation.

Conclusions: In this qualitative study, healthcare CEOs described mixed perspectives on their role engaging in social and political issues and identified several factors impacting engagement. CEOs cited few strategies to measure the success of their engagement. Given that healthcare leaders are increasingly asked to address policy debates, more work is needed to examine the role and impact of healthcare CEOs engaging in health-related social and political issues.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信