墨尔本三角洲疫潮期间当地 SARS-Cov-2 爆发的时间和疫苗接种覆盖率。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Mehr Gupta , Kat Bogatyreva , Kiran Pienaar , Hassan Vally , Catherine M. Bennett
{"title":"墨尔本三角洲疫潮期间当地 SARS-Cov-2 爆发的时间和疫苗接种覆盖率。","authors":"Mehr Gupta ,&nbsp;Kat Bogatyreva ,&nbsp;Kiran Pienaar ,&nbsp;Hassan Vally ,&nbsp;Catherine M. Bennett","doi":"10.1016/j.anzjph.2024.100164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This article presents a longitudinal analysis of COVID-19 infection and vaccination coverage in Melbourne metropolitan local government areas (LGAs) during the 2021 Delta wave.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>COVID-19 vaccination and infection data from 12 July to 27 November 2021 were sourced from government websites. Summary statistics and associated 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were compared by LGA ranked according to socioeconomic status: total “burden” (total infections per thousand), “peak” (highest weekly infection rate), “lag” (interval between peak and 70% double vaccination).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>LGAs in the bottom five deciles for social advantage experienced higher infection rates (39.0 per thousand [95% CI: 38.5, 39.5] <em>vs.</em> 14.8 [14.7, 14.9]), and had lower two-dose vaccination coverage (23.8% [23.6, 23.9] <em>vs.</em> 32.7% [32.6, 32.7]) compared with LGAs in the top five deciles. LGAs that achieved 70% coverage two weeks or more after the infection peak experienced nearly twice the total infection burden (27.7 per 1000 [27.3, 28.0] compared with 14.9 [14.7, 15.0]) than LGAs with a shorter lag.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Exposure and transmission risk factors cluster within disadvantaged LGAs. The potential for large local outbreaks is heightened if vaccination uptake trails in these communities.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for Public Health</h3><p>In a pandemic, decision-makers must prioritise disease control and harm reduction interventions for at-risk LGAs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8620,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health","volume":"48 4","pages":"Article 100164"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1326020024000396/pdfft?md5=742c265e5dd1987abbfabec0fbb406d4&pid=1-s2.0-S1326020024000396-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The timing of local SARS-Cov-2 outbreaks and vaccination coverage during the Delta wave in Melbourne\",\"authors\":\"Mehr Gupta ,&nbsp;Kat Bogatyreva ,&nbsp;Kiran Pienaar ,&nbsp;Hassan Vally ,&nbsp;Catherine M. Bennett\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anzjph.2024.100164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This article presents a longitudinal analysis of COVID-19 infection and vaccination coverage in Melbourne metropolitan local government areas (LGAs) during the 2021 Delta wave.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>COVID-19 vaccination and infection data from 12 July to 27 November 2021 were sourced from government websites. Summary statistics and associated 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were compared by LGA ranked according to socioeconomic status: total “burden” (total infections per thousand), “peak” (highest weekly infection rate), “lag” (interval between peak and 70% double vaccination).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>LGAs in the bottom five deciles for social advantage experienced higher infection rates (39.0 per thousand [95% CI: 38.5, 39.5] <em>vs.</em> 14.8 [14.7, 14.9]), and had lower two-dose vaccination coverage (23.8% [23.6, 23.9] <em>vs.</em> 32.7% [32.6, 32.7]) compared with LGAs in the top five deciles. LGAs that achieved 70% coverage two weeks or more after the infection peak experienced nearly twice the total infection burden (27.7 per 1000 [27.3, 28.0] compared with 14.9 [14.7, 15.0]) than LGAs with a shorter lag.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Exposure and transmission risk factors cluster within disadvantaged LGAs. The potential for large local outbreaks is heightened if vaccination uptake trails in these communities.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for Public Health</h3><p>In a pandemic, decision-makers must prioritise disease control and harm reduction interventions for at-risk LGAs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health\",\"volume\":\"48 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1326020024000396/pdfft?md5=742c265e5dd1987abbfabec0fbb406d4&pid=1-s2.0-S1326020024000396-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1326020024000396\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1326020024000396","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文纵向分析了墨尔本大都会地方政府辖区(LGAs)在 2021 年三角洲波期间的 COVID-19 感染和疫苗接种覆盖率:2021年7月12日至11月27日的COVID-19疫苗接种和感染数据来自政府网站。根据社会经济地位对各地方政府辖区的总 "负担"(每千人感染总人数)、"峰值"(每周最高感染率)、"滞后"(峰值与 70% 双倍疫苗接种率之间的间隔)进行了汇总统计和相关 95% 置信区间 (95 CI) 比较:与社会优势排名后五位的十等分地区相比,感染率较高(39.0%.[95% CI:38.5, 39.5] vs. 14.8 [14.7, 14.9]),两剂疫苗接种覆盖率较低(23.8% [23.6, 23.9] vs. 32.7% [32.6, 32.7])。在感染高峰期两周或更长时间后达到 70% 覆盖率的 LGA 的总感染负担(27.7%.[27.3, 28.0]与 14.9%.[14.7, 15.0])几乎是滞后时间较短的 LGA 的两倍:结论:暴露和传播风险因素集中在条件较差的地区。结论:暴露和传播风险因素集中在条件较差的地方社区,如果这些社区的疫苗接种率出现滞后,则当地大规模爆发的可能性就会增加:对公共卫生的影响:在大流行病中,决策者必须优先考虑对高风险地区采取疾病控制和减少危害的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The timing of local SARS-Cov-2 outbreaks and vaccination coverage during the Delta wave in Melbourne

Objective

This article presents a longitudinal analysis of COVID-19 infection and vaccination coverage in Melbourne metropolitan local government areas (LGAs) during the 2021 Delta wave.

Methods

COVID-19 vaccination and infection data from 12 July to 27 November 2021 were sourced from government websites. Summary statistics and associated 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were compared by LGA ranked according to socioeconomic status: total “burden” (total infections per thousand), “peak” (highest weekly infection rate), “lag” (interval between peak and 70% double vaccination).

Results

LGAs in the bottom five deciles for social advantage experienced higher infection rates (39.0 per thousand [95% CI: 38.5, 39.5] vs. 14.8 [14.7, 14.9]), and had lower two-dose vaccination coverage (23.8% [23.6, 23.9] vs. 32.7% [32.6, 32.7]) compared with LGAs in the top five deciles. LGAs that achieved 70% coverage two weeks or more after the infection peak experienced nearly twice the total infection burden (27.7 per 1000 [27.3, 28.0] compared with 14.9 [14.7, 15.0]) than LGAs with a shorter lag.

Conclusions

Exposure and transmission risk factors cluster within disadvantaged LGAs. The potential for large local outbreaks is heightened if vaccination uptake trails in these communities.

Implications for Public Health

In a pandemic, decision-makers must prioritise disease control and harm reduction interventions for at-risk LGAs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health (ANZJPH) is concerned with public health issues. The research reported includes formal epidemiological inquiries into the correlates and causes of diseases and health-related behaviour, analyses of public policy affecting health and disease, and detailed studies of the cultures and social structures within which health and illness exist. The Journal is multidisciplinary and aims to publish methodologically sound research from any of the academic disciplines that constitute public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信