双壳贝类和海藻养殖的生态承载能力指标

IF 8.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 FISHERIES
Carrie J. Byron, Sophie J. I. Koch, Myriam D. Callier, Lotta Kluger, Dror L. Angel, Jan Vanaverbeke, Ramon Filgueira
{"title":"双壳贝类和海藻养殖的生态承载能力指标","authors":"Carrie J. Byron,&nbsp;Sophie J. I. Koch,&nbsp;Myriam D. Callier,&nbsp;Lotta Kluger,&nbsp;Dror L. Angel,&nbsp;Jan Vanaverbeke,&nbsp;Ramon Filgueira","doi":"10.1111/raq.12945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Within the framework of Ecosystem Approach to Aquaculture (EAA), ecological carrying capacity (ECC) is a key concept that helps to determine the upper limit of production without compromising ecosystem functioning. The implementation of ECC is complex as ECC differs between type of farms and location and standardised methods should be developed for management. There is therefore a clear need for operational indicators. The objectives of this paper were: (1) to carry out a systematic literature review on shellfish and seaweed aquaculture-environment interactions to list the most used environmental indicators, (2) to classify the indicators according to the effects they measure (i.e., benthic, water quality, food web interactions, cultured organism health, resource use) and the scale at which they are applied, and (3) to assess their potential based on four indicator criteria categories: sensitivity, accuracy and precision, feasibility and utility, and ecosystem-level scalability. Overall, indicators describing benthic effects were the most highly cited and scored. Indicators identified for bivalve and seaweed culture were discussed and compared to previous work on salmon aquaculture indicators to highlight similarities and differences across trophic levels. In addition, questions related to the challenges of ECC indicators implementation were presented to a panel of experts. The scoring and consultation provided the source of discussion on environmental management consistent with EAA.</p>","PeriodicalId":227,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Aquaculture","volume":"16 4","pages":"2010-2022"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indicators for ecological carrying capacity of bivalve and seaweed aquaculture\",\"authors\":\"Carrie J. Byron,&nbsp;Sophie J. I. Koch,&nbsp;Myriam D. Callier,&nbsp;Lotta Kluger,&nbsp;Dror L. Angel,&nbsp;Jan Vanaverbeke,&nbsp;Ramon Filgueira\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/raq.12945\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Within the framework of Ecosystem Approach to Aquaculture (EAA), ecological carrying capacity (ECC) is a key concept that helps to determine the upper limit of production without compromising ecosystem functioning. The implementation of ECC is complex as ECC differs between type of farms and location and standardised methods should be developed for management. There is therefore a clear need for operational indicators. The objectives of this paper were: (1) to carry out a systematic literature review on shellfish and seaweed aquaculture-environment interactions to list the most used environmental indicators, (2) to classify the indicators according to the effects they measure (i.e., benthic, water quality, food web interactions, cultured organism health, resource use) and the scale at which they are applied, and (3) to assess their potential based on four indicator criteria categories: sensitivity, accuracy and precision, feasibility and utility, and ecosystem-level scalability. Overall, indicators describing benthic effects were the most highly cited and scored. Indicators identified for bivalve and seaweed culture were discussed and compared to previous work on salmon aquaculture indicators to highlight similarities and differences across trophic levels. In addition, questions related to the challenges of ECC indicators implementation were presented to a panel of experts. The scoring and consultation provided the source of discussion on environmental management consistent with EAA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in Aquaculture\",\"volume\":\"16 4\",\"pages\":\"2010-2022\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in Aquaculture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/raq.12945\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Aquaculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/raq.12945","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在水产养殖生态系统方法(EAA)框架内,生态承载力(ECC)是一个关键概念,有助于在不损害生态系统功能的情况下确定生产上限。生态承载力的实施非常复杂,因为不同类型的养殖场和不同地点的生态承载力各不相同,应制定标准化的管理方法。因此,显然需要制定操作指标。本文的目标是(1) 对贝类和海藻水产养殖与环境的相互作用进行系统的文献综述,列出最常用的环境指标,(2) 根据指标测量的效果(即底栖、水质、食物网相互作用、养殖生物健康、资源利用)和应用规模对指标进行分类,(3) 根据四个指标标准类别评估其潜力:灵敏度、准确性和精确度、可行性和实用性以及生态系统级可扩展性。总体而言,描述底栖生物影响的指标被引用和评分最多。对双壳贝类和海藻养殖指标进行了讨论,并将其与以前的鲑鱼养殖指标进行了比较,以突出不同营养级的异同。此外,还向专家小组提出了与实施环境协调委员会指标的挑战有关的问题。评分和咨询为讨论与 EAA 一致的环境管理提供了源泉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Indicators for ecological carrying capacity of bivalve and seaweed aquaculture

Within the framework of Ecosystem Approach to Aquaculture (EAA), ecological carrying capacity (ECC) is a key concept that helps to determine the upper limit of production without compromising ecosystem functioning. The implementation of ECC is complex as ECC differs between type of farms and location and standardised methods should be developed for management. There is therefore a clear need for operational indicators. The objectives of this paper were: (1) to carry out a systematic literature review on shellfish and seaweed aquaculture-environment interactions to list the most used environmental indicators, (2) to classify the indicators according to the effects they measure (i.e., benthic, water quality, food web interactions, cultured organism health, resource use) and the scale at which they are applied, and (3) to assess their potential based on four indicator criteria categories: sensitivity, accuracy and precision, feasibility and utility, and ecosystem-level scalability. Overall, indicators describing benthic effects were the most highly cited and scored. Indicators identified for bivalve and seaweed culture were discussed and compared to previous work on salmon aquaculture indicators to highlight similarities and differences across trophic levels. In addition, questions related to the challenges of ECC indicators implementation were presented to a panel of experts. The scoring and consultation provided the source of discussion on environmental management consistent with EAA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
24.80
自引率
5.80%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Reviews in Aquaculture is a journal that aims to provide a platform for reviews on various aspects of aquaculture science, techniques, policies, and planning. The journal publishes fully peer-reviewed review articles on topics including global, regional, and national production and market trends in aquaculture, advancements in aquaculture practices and technology, interactions between aquaculture and the environment, indigenous and alien species in aquaculture, genetics and its relation to aquaculture, as well as aquaculture product quality and traceability. The journal is indexed and abstracted in several databases including AgBiotech News & Information (CABI), AgBiotechNet, Agricultural Engineering Abstracts, Environment Index (EBSCO Publishing), SCOPUS (Elsevier), and Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics) among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信