Francesco Ditonno, Antonio Franco, Alessandro Veccia, Eugenio Bologna, Linhui Wang, Firas Abdollah, Marco Finati, Giuseppe Simone, Gabriele Tuderti, Emma Helstrom, Andreas Correa, Ottavio DE Cobelli, Matteo Ferro, Francesco Porpiglia, Daniele Amparore, Antonio Tufano, Sisto Perdonà, Raj Bhanvadia, Vitaly Margulis, Andres Brönimann, Nirmish Singla, Dhruv Puri, Ithaar H Derweesh, Dinno F Mendiola, Mark L Gonzalgo, Reuben Ben-David, Reza Mehrazin, Sol C Moon, Soroush Rais-Bahrami, Courtney Yong, Farshad Sheybaee Moghaddam, Alireza Ghoreifi, Chandru P Sundaram, Zhenjie Wu, Hooman Djaladat, Alessandro Antonelli, Riccardo Autorino
{"title":"机器人远端输尿管切除术治疗高风险远端输尿管尿路上皮癌：回顾性多中心比较分析（ROBUUST 2.0协作组）。","authors":"Francesco Ditonno, Antonio Franco, Alessandro Veccia, Eugenio Bologna, Linhui Wang, Firas Abdollah, Marco Finati, Giuseppe Simone, Gabriele Tuderti, Emma Helstrom, Andreas Correa, Ottavio DE Cobelli, Matteo Ferro, Francesco Porpiglia, Daniele Amparore, Antonio Tufano, Sisto Perdonà, Raj Bhanvadia, Vitaly Margulis, Andres Brönimann, Nirmish Singla, Dhruv Puri, Ithaar H Derweesh, Dinno F Mendiola, Mark L Gonzalgo, Reuben Ben-David, Reza Mehrazin, Sol C Moon, Soroush Rais-Bahrami, Courtney Yong, Farshad Sheybaee Moghaddam, Alireza Ghoreifi, Chandru P Sundaram, Zhenjie Wu, Hooman Djaladat, Alessandro Antonelli, Riccardo Autorino","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05737-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The role of kidney-sparing surgery in patients with high-risk upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma is controversial. The present study aimed to assess oncological and functional outcomes of robot-assisted distal ureterectomy in patients with high-risk distal ureteral tumors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The ROBUUST 2.0 multicenter international (2015-2022) dataset was used for this retrospective cohort analysis. High-risk patients with distal ureteral tumors were divided based on type of surgery: robot-assisted distal ureterectomy or robot-assisted nephroureterectomy. A survival analysis was performed for local recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival. After adjusting for clinical features of the high-risk prognostic group, Cox proportional hazard model was plotted to evaluate significant predictors of time-to-event outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 477 patients were retrieved, of which 58 received robot-assisted distal ureterectomy and 419 robot-assisted nephroureterectomy, respectively, with a mean (±SD) follow-up of 29.6 months (±2.6). The two groups were comparable in terms of baseline features. At survival analysis, no significant difference was observed in terms of recurrence-free survival (P=0.6), metastasis-free survival (P=0.5) and overall survival (P=0.7) between robot-assisted distal ureterectomy and robot-assisted nephroureterectomy. At Cox regression analysis, type of surgery was never a significant predictor of worse oncological outcomes. At last follow-up patients undergoing robot-assisted distal ureterectomy had significantly better postoperative renal function.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Comparable outcomes in terms of recurrence-free survival, metastasis-free survival, and overall survival between robot-assisted distal ureterectomy and robot-assisted nephroureterectomy patients, and better postoperative renal function preservation in the former group were observed. Kidney-sparing surgery should be considered as a potential option for selected patients with high-risk distal ureteral UTUC.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":"76 3","pages":"331-339"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robotic distal ureterectomy for high-risk distal ureteral urothelial carcinoma: a retrospective multicenter comparative analysis (ROBUUST 2.0 collaborative group).\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Ditonno, Antonio Franco, Alessandro Veccia, Eugenio Bologna, Linhui Wang, Firas Abdollah, Marco Finati, Giuseppe Simone, Gabriele Tuderti, Emma Helstrom, Andreas Correa, Ottavio DE Cobelli, Matteo Ferro, Francesco Porpiglia, Daniele Amparore, Antonio Tufano, Sisto Perdonà, Raj Bhanvadia, Vitaly Margulis, Andres Brönimann, Nirmish Singla, Dhruv Puri, Ithaar H Derweesh, Dinno F Mendiola, Mark L Gonzalgo, Reuben Ben-David, Reza Mehrazin, Sol C Moon, Soroush Rais-Bahrami, Courtney Yong, Farshad Sheybaee Moghaddam, Alireza Ghoreifi, Chandru P Sundaram, Zhenjie Wu, Hooman Djaladat, Alessandro Antonelli, Riccardo Autorino\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05737-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The role of kidney-sparing surgery in patients with high-risk upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma is controversial. The present study aimed to assess oncological and functional outcomes of robot-assisted distal ureterectomy in patients with high-risk distal ureteral tumors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The ROBUUST 2.0 multicenter international (2015-2022) dataset was used for this retrospective cohort analysis. High-risk patients with distal ureteral tumors were divided based on type of surgery: robot-assisted distal ureterectomy or robot-assisted nephroureterectomy. A survival analysis was performed for local recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival. After adjusting for clinical features of the high-risk prognostic group, Cox proportional hazard model was plotted to evaluate significant predictors of time-to-event outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 477 patients were retrieved, of which 58 received robot-assisted distal ureterectomy and 419 robot-assisted nephroureterectomy, respectively, with a mean (±SD) follow-up of 29.6 months (±2.6). The two groups were comparable in terms of baseline features. At survival analysis, no significant difference was observed in terms of recurrence-free survival (P=0.6), metastasis-free survival (P=0.5) and overall survival (P=0.7) between robot-assisted distal ureterectomy and robot-assisted nephroureterectomy. At Cox regression analysis, type of surgery was never a significant predictor of worse oncological outcomes. At last follow-up patients undergoing robot-assisted distal ureterectomy had significantly better postoperative renal function.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Comparable outcomes in terms of recurrence-free survival, metastasis-free survival, and overall survival between robot-assisted distal ureterectomy and robot-assisted nephroureterectomy patients, and better postoperative renal function preservation in the former group were observed. Kidney-sparing surgery should be considered as a potential option for selected patients with high-risk distal ureteral UTUC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva Urology and Nephrology\",\"volume\":\"76 3\",\"pages\":\"331-339\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva Urology and Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05737-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05737-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Robotic distal ureterectomy for high-risk distal ureteral urothelial carcinoma: a retrospective multicenter comparative analysis (ROBUUST 2.0 collaborative group).
Background: The role of kidney-sparing surgery in patients with high-risk upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma is controversial. The present study aimed to assess oncological and functional outcomes of robot-assisted distal ureterectomy in patients with high-risk distal ureteral tumors.
Methods: The ROBUUST 2.0 multicenter international (2015-2022) dataset was used for this retrospective cohort analysis. High-risk patients with distal ureteral tumors were divided based on type of surgery: robot-assisted distal ureterectomy or robot-assisted nephroureterectomy. A survival analysis was performed for local recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival. After adjusting for clinical features of the high-risk prognostic group, Cox proportional hazard model was plotted to evaluate significant predictors of time-to-event outcomes.
Results: Overall, 477 patients were retrieved, of which 58 received robot-assisted distal ureterectomy and 419 robot-assisted nephroureterectomy, respectively, with a mean (±SD) follow-up of 29.6 months (±2.6). The two groups were comparable in terms of baseline features. At survival analysis, no significant difference was observed in terms of recurrence-free survival (P=0.6), metastasis-free survival (P=0.5) and overall survival (P=0.7) between robot-assisted distal ureterectomy and robot-assisted nephroureterectomy. At Cox regression analysis, type of surgery was never a significant predictor of worse oncological outcomes. At last follow-up patients undergoing robot-assisted distal ureterectomy had significantly better postoperative renal function.
Conclusions: Comparable outcomes in terms of recurrence-free survival, metastasis-free survival, and overall survival between robot-assisted distal ureterectomy and robot-assisted nephroureterectomy patients, and better postoperative renal function preservation in the former group were observed. Kidney-sparing surgery should be considered as a potential option for selected patients with high-risk distal ureteral UTUC.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
