记录青少年脑震荡后非卧床评估方法的依从性和症状反应性:移动神经认知健康(MNCH)项目的可行性。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-26 DOI:10.1097/HTR.0000000000000977
R J Elbin, Kori J Durfee, Melissa N Womble, Sabrina Jennings, Sheri Fedor, Christina M Dollar, John M Felt, Daniel B Elbich, Jonathan G Hakun
{"title":"记录青少年脑震荡后非卧床评估方法的依从性和症状反应性:移动神经认知健康(MNCH)项目的可行性。","authors":"R J Elbin, Kori J Durfee, Melissa N Womble, Sabrina Jennings, Sheri Fedor, Christina M Dollar, John M Felt, Daniel B Elbich, Jonathan G Hakun","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000000977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate compliance, symptom reactivity, and acceptability/experience ratings for an ecological momentary assessment (EMA) protocol involving ultra-brief ambulatory cognitive assessments in adolescent and young adult patients with concussion.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Outpatient concussion clinic.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>116 patients aged 13 to 25 years with concussion.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective research design was used to examine compliance, symptom reactivity, and acceptability/experience for the Mobile Neurocognitive Health Project (MNCH); an EMA study of environmental exposures, symptoms, objective cognitive functioning, and symptom reactivity involving 4, daily EMA surveys (7:30 am , 10:30 am , 3:00 pm , 8:00 pm ) for a period of 7 days following concussion. Overall compliance rates, symptom reactivity scores, and participant acceptability/experience ratings were described. A series of non-parametric Friedman Tests with post-hoc Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to examine differences in compliance and reactivity related to time of day and over the course of the protocol (first 3 days [Early Week] vs last 4 days [Late Week]).</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Compliance rates, symptom reactivity scores, participant experience/acceptability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall median compliance was 71%, and there were significantly fewer 7:30 am surveys completed compared to the 10:30 am ( Z = -4 .88, P ≤ .001), 3:00 pm ( Z = -4 .13, P ≤ .001), and 8:00 pm ( Z = -4 .68, P ≤ .001) surveys. Compliance for Early Week surveys were significantly higher than Late Week ( Z = -2 .16, P = .009). The median symptom reactivity score was 34.39 out of 100 and was significantly higher for Early Week compared to Late Week ( Z = -4 .59, P ≤ .001). Ninety-nine percent (89/90) of the sample agreed that the app was easy to use, and 18% (16/90) indicated that the app interfered with their daily life.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adolescents and young adults with concussion were compliant with the MNCH EMA protocol. Symptom reactivity to the protocol was low and the majority of participants reported that the app and protocol were acceptable. These findings support further investigation into applications of EMA for use in concussion studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"E87-E95"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11669726/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Documenting Compliance and Symptom Reactivity for Ambulatory Assessment Methodology Following Concussion in Adolescents and Young Adults: Feasibility of the Mobile Neurocognitive Health (MNCH) Project.\",\"authors\":\"R J Elbin, Kori J Durfee, Melissa N Womble, Sabrina Jennings, Sheri Fedor, Christina M Dollar, John M Felt, Daniel B Elbich, Jonathan G Hakun\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/HTR.0000000000000977\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate compliance, symptom reactivity, and acceptability/experience ratings for an ecological momentary assessment (EMA) protocol involving ultra-brief ambulatory cognitive assessments in adolescent and young adult patients with concussion.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Outpatient concussion clinic.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>116 patients aged 13 to 25 years with concussion.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective research design was used to examine compliance, symptom reactivity, and acceptability/experience for the Mobile Neurocognitive Health Project (MNCH); an EMA study of environmental exposures, symptoms, objective cognitive functioning, and symptom reactivity involving 4, daily EMA surveys (7:30 am , 10:30 am , 3:00 pm , 8:00 pm ) for a period of 7 days following concussion. Overall compliance rates, symptom reactivity scores, and participant acceptability/experience ratings were described. A series of non-parametric Friedman Tests with post-hoc Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to examine differences in compliance and reactivity related to time of day and over the course of the protocol (first 3 days [Early Week] vs last 4 days [Late Week]).</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Compliance rates, symptom reactivity scores, participant experience/acceptability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall median compliance was 71%, and there were significantly fewer 7:30 am surveys completed compared to the 10:30 am ( Z = -4 .88, P ≤ .001), 3:00 pm ( Z = -4 .13, P ≤ .001), and 8:00 pm ( Z = -4 .68, P ≤ .001) surveys. Compliance for Early Week surveys were significantly higher than Late Week ( Z = -2 .16, P = .009). The median symptom reactivity score was 34.39 out of 100 and was significantly higher for Early Week compared to Late Week ( Z = -4 .59, P ≤ .001). Ninety-nine percent (89/90) of the sample agreed that the app was easy to use, and 18% (16/90) indicated that the app interfered with their daily life.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adolescents and young adults with concussion were compliant with the MNCH EMA protocol. Symptom reactivity to the protocol was low and the majority of participants reported that the app and protocol were acceptable. These findings support further investigation into applications of EMA for use in concussion studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"E87-E95\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11669726/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000977\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000977","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估生态瞬间评估(EMA)方案的依从性、症状反应性和可接受性/体验评分:评估生态瞬间评估(EMA)方案的依从性、症状反应性和可接受性/体验评分,该方案涉及对青少年和年轻成年脑震荡患者进行超短时间的非卧床认知评估:环境:脑震荡门诊:116名年龄在13至25岁之间的脑震荡患者:设计:采用前瞻性研究设计来检查移动神经认知健康项目(MNCH)的依从性、症状反应性和可接受性/体验;这是一项针对环境暴露、症状、客观认知功能和症状反应性的 EMA 研究,涉及脑震荡后 7 天内每天 4 次 EMA 调查(上午 7:30、上午 10:30、下午 3:00、晚上 8:00)。对总体依从率、症状反应评分以及参与者的可接受性/体验评分进行了描述。采用了一系列非参数弗里德曼检验和事后 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验,以检查与一天中的时间和方案过程(前 3 天[早期周]与最后 4 天[晚期周])有关的依从性和反应性差异:主要测量指标:依从率、症状反应评分、参与者体验/可接受性:总体符合率中位数为 71%,与上午 10:30(Z = -4.88,P ≤ .001)、下午 3:00(Z = -4.13,P ≤ .001)和晚上 8:00(Z = -4.68,P ≤ .001)的调查相比,上午 7:30 完成的调查明显较少。早周调查的依从性明显高于晚周(Z = -2.16,P = .009)。症状反应性得分的中位数为 34.39 分(满分 100 分),早周明显高于晚周(Z = -4.59,P≤ .001)。99%的样本(89/90)认为该应用程序易于使用,18%的样本(16/90)表示该应用程序干扰了他们的日常生活:结论:患有脑震荡的青少年和年轻人都能遵守 MNCH EMA 协议。对方案的症状反应较低,大多数参与者表示可以接受该应用程序和方案。这些发现支持进一步调查 EMA 在脑震荡研究中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Documenting Compliance and Symptom Reactivity for Ambulatory Assessment Methodology Following Concussion in Adolescents and Young Adults: Feasibility of the Mobile Neurocognitive Health (MNCH) Project.

Objective: Evaluate compliance, symptom reactivity, and acceptability/experience ratings for an ecological momentary assessment (EMA) protocol involving ultra-brief ambulatory cognitive assessments in adolescent and young adult patients with concussion.

Setting: Outpatient concussion clinic.

Participants: 116 patients aged 13 to 25 years with concussion.

Design: Prospective research design was used to examine compliance, symptom reactivity, and acceptability/experience for the Mobile Neurocognitive Health Project (MNCH); an EMA study of environmental exposures, symptoms, objective cognitive functioning, and symptom reactivity involving 4, daily EMA surveys (7:30 am , 10:30 am , 3:00 pm , 8:00 pm ) for a period of 7 days following concussion. Overall compliance rates, symptom reactivity scores, and participant acceptability/experience ratings were described. A series of non-parametric Friedman Tests with post-hoc Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to examine differences in compliance and reactivity related to time of day and over the course of the protocol (first 3 days [Early Week] vs last 4 days [Late Week]).

Main measures: Compliance rates, symptom reactivity scores, participant experience/acceptability.

Results: Overall median compliance was 71%, and there were significantly fewer 7:30 am surveys completed compared to the 10:30 am ( Z = -4 .88, P ≤ .001), 3:00 pm ( Z = -4 .13, P ≤ .001), and 8:00 pm ( Z = -4 .68, P ≤ .001) surveys. Compliance for Early Week surveys were significantly higher than Late Week ( Z = -2 .16, P = .009). The median symptom reactivity score was 34.39 out of 100 and was significantly higher for Early Week compared to Late Week ( Z = -4 .59, P ≤ .001). Ninety-nine percent (89/90) of the sample agreed that the app was easy to use, and 18% (16/90) indicated that the app interfered with their daily life.

Conclusion: Adolescents and young adults with concussion were compliant with the MNCH EMA protocol. Symptom reactivity to the protocol was low and the majority of participants reported that the app and protocol were acceptable. These findings support further investigation into applications of EMA for use in concussion studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
153
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation is a leading, peer-reviewed resource that provides up-to-date information on the clinical management and rehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injuries. Six issues each year aspire to the vision of “knowledge informing care” and include a wide range of articles, topical issues, commentaries and special features. It is the official journal of the Brain Injury Association of America (BIAA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信