Mostafa Abozeed, Kevin Junck, Seth Lirette, Tom Kimpe, Albert Xthona, Srini Tridandapani, Jordan Perchik
{"title":"X 光片的解读时间效率：标准 6 MP 和 12 MP 高分辨率显示屏的对比研究。","authors":"Mostafa Abozeed, Kevin Junck, Seth Lirette, Tom Kimpe, Albert Xthona, Srini Tridandapani, Jordan Perchik","doi":"10.1117/1.JMI.11.3.035502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study is to compare interpretation efficiency of radiologists reading radiographs on 6 megapixel (MP) versus 12 MP monitors.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>Our method compares two sets of monitors in two phases: in phase I, radiologists interpreted using a 6 MP, 30.4 in. (Barco Coronis Fusion) and in phase II, a 12 MP, 30.9 in. (Barco Nio Fusion). Nine chest and three musculoskeletal radiologists each batch interpreted an average of 115 radiographs in phase I and 115 radiographs in phase II as a part of routine clinical work. Radiologists were blinded to monitor resolution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interpretation times per radiograph were noted from dictation logs. Interpretation time was significantly decreased utilizing a 12 MP monitor by 6.88 s ( <math><mrow><mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.002</mn></mrow> </math> ) and 6.76 s (8.7%) ( <math><mrow><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.001</mn></mrow> </math> ) for chest radiographs only and combined chest and musculoskeletal radiographs, respectively. When evaluating musculoskeletal radiographs alone, the improvement in reading times with 12 MP monitor was 6.76 s, however, this difference was not statistically significant ( <math><mrow><mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.111</mn></mrow> </math> ). Interpretation of radiographs on 12 MP monitors was 8.7% faster than on 6 MP monitors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Higher resolution diagnostic displays can enable radiologists to interpret radiographs more efficiently.</p>","PeriodicalId":47707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging","volume":"11 3","pages":"035502"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11193489/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interpretation time efficiency with radiographs: a comparison study between standard 6 and 12 MP high-resolution display monitors.\",\"authors\":\"Mostafa Abozeed, Kevin Junck, Seth Lirette, Tom Kimpe, Albert Xthona, Srini Tridandapani, Jordan Perchik\",\"doi\":\"10.1117/1.JMI.11.3.035502\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study is to compare interpretation efficiency of radiologists reading radiographs on 6 megapixel (MP) versus 12 MP monitors.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>Our method compares two sets of monitors in two phases: in phase I, radiologists interpreted using a 6 MP, 30.4 in. (Barco Coronis Fusion) and in phase II, a 12 MP, 30.9 in. (Barco Nio Fusion). Nine chest and three musculoskeletal radiologists each batch interpreted an average of 115 radiographs in phase I and 115 radiographs in phase II as a part of routine clinical work. Radiologists were blinded to monitor resolution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interpretation times per radiograph were noted from dictation logs. Interpretation time was significantly decreased utilizing a 12 MP monitor by 6.88 s ( <math><mrow><mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.002</mn></mrow> </math> ) and 6.76 s (8.7%) ( <math><mrow><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.001</mn></mrow> </math> ) for chest radiographs only and combined chest and musculoskeletal radiographs, respectively. When evaluating musculoskeletal radiographs alone, the improvement in reading times with 12 MP monitor was 6.76 s, however, this difference was not statistically significant ( <math><mrow><mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.111</mn></mrow> </math> ). Interpretation of radiographs on 12 MP monitors was 8.7% faster than on 6 MP monitors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Higher resolution diagnostic displays can enable radiologists to interpret radiographs more efficiently.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging\",\"volume\":\"11 3\",\"pages\":\"035502\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11193489/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.11.3.035502\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.11.3.035502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Interpretation time efficiency with radiographs: a comparison study between standard 6 and 12 MP high-resolution display monitors.
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare interpretation efficiency of radiologists reading radiographs on 6 megapixel (MP) versus 12 MP monitors.
Approach: Our method compares two sets of monitors in two phases: in phase I, radiologists interpreted using a 6 MP, 30.4 in. (Barco Coronis Fusion) and in phase II, a 12 MP, 30.9 in. (Barco Nio Fusion). Nine chest and three musculoskeletal radiologists each batch interpreted an average of 115 radiographs in phase I and 115 radiographs in phase II as a part of routine clinical work. Radiologists were blinded to monitor resolution.
Results: Interpretation times per radiograph were noted from dictation logs. Interpretation time was significantly decreased utilizing a 12 MP monitor by 6.88 s ( ) and 6.76 s (8.7%) ( ) for chest radiographs only and combined chest and musculoskeletal radiographs, respectively. When evaluating musculoskeletal radiographs alone, the improvement in reading times with 12 MP monitor was 6.76 s, however, this difference was not statistically significant ( ). Interpretation of radiographs on 12 MP monitors was 8.7% faster than on 6 MP monitors.
Conclusion: Higher resolution diagnostic displays can enable radiologists to interpret radiographs more efficiently.
期刊介绍：
JMI covers fundamental and translational research, as well as applications, focused on medical imaging, which continue to yield physical and biomedical advancements in the early detection, diagnostics, and therapy of disease as well as in the understanding of normal. The scope of JMI includes: Imaging physics, Tomographic reconstruction algorithms (such as those in CT and MRI), Image processing and deep learning, Computer-aided diagnosis and quantitative image analysis, Visualization and modeling, Picture archiving and communications systems (PACS), Image perception and observer performance, Technology assessment, Ultrasonic imaging, Image-guided procedures, Digital pathology, Biomedical applications of biomedical imaging. JMI allows for the peer-reviewed communication and archiving of scientific developments, translational and clinical applications, reviews, and recommendations for the field.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
