通过观察分析,寻找优化小肠胶囊诊断产量的方法。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Benito Velayos, Loreto Calleja, María Fe Muñoz, Antonella Rizzo, Ana Macho, Lourdes Olmo, Concepción García, Beatriz Antolín, Sandra Izquierdo, Luis Fernández
{"title":"通过观察分析,寻找优化小肠胶囊诊断产量的方法。","authors":"Benito Velayos, Loreto Calleja, María Fe Muñoz, Antonella Rizzo, Ana Macho, Lourdes Olmo, Concepción García, Beatriz Antolín, Sandra Izquierdo, Luis Fernández","doi":"10.1016/j.gastrohep.2024.502223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To search for parameters susceptible to optimization when performing capsule endoscopy (CE) in a third level hospital with high volume and experience in this test.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Retrospective observational study, including 1325 CEs performed between 2017 and 2022. Overall diagnostic yield, effective diagnostic yield, by indication, place of request and waiting list, as well as complete examination rate and cleansing degree were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall diagnostic yield was 70.99%, while the effective diagnostic yield was 72.7%. Diagnostic yields varied between 60.2% and 77.9% depending on the indication and between 64.7% and 74.3% depending on the requesting center. The mean waiting list was 101.15 days, with a tendency to worse results when the waiting list was longer. A total of 77.8% of the examinations were complete. Completion rates were lower in patients >70 years of age (p=0.001), as well as in those with gastric transit >60minutes (p=0.000). A total of 77.3% were clean, with debris that did not impede diagnosis being found in 16.9% and debris that did impede diagnosis in 5.8%. There was a relationship, although not significant, between cleansing degree and age.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The diagnostic yields of CE in our center are in line with those previously reported. Differences were found according to the place of request. Waiting list could also influence diagnostic yield. Completion rates are lower in >70 years of age and when gastric transit is >60minutes. Cleansing degree achieved is acceptable.</p>","PeriodicalId":12802,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterologia y hepatologia","volume":" ","pages":"502223"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Search for small-bowel capsule diagnostic yield optimization conducted through observational analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Benito Velayos, Loreto Calleja, María Fe Muñoz, Antonella Rizzo, Ana Macho, Lourdes Olmo, Concepción García, Beatriz Antolín, Sandra Izquierdo, Luis Fernández\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gastrohep.2024.502223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To search for parameters susceptible to optimization when performing capsule endoscopy (CE) in a third level hospital with high volume and experience in this test.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Retrospective observational study, including 1325 CEs performed between 2017 and 2022. Overall diagnostic yield, effective diagnostic yield, by indication, place of request and waiting list, as well as complete examination rate and cleansing degree were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall diagnostic yield was 70.99%, while the effective diagnostic yield was 72.7%. Diagnostic yields varied between 60.2% and 77.9% depending on the indication and between 64.7% and 74.3% depending on the requesting center. The mean waiting list was 101.15 days, with a tendency to worse results when the waiting list was longer. A total of 77.8% of the examinations were complete. Completion rates were lower in patients >70 years of age (p=0.001), as well as in those with gastric transit >60minutes (p=0.000). A total of 77.3% were clean, with debris that did not impede diagnosis being found in 16.9% and debris that did impede diagnosis in 5.8%. There was a relationship, although not significant, between cleansing degree and age.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The diagnostic yields of CE in our center are in line with those previously reported. Differences were found according to the place of request. Waiting list could also influence diagnostic yield. Completion rates are lower in >70 years of age and when gastric transit is >60minutes. Cleansing degree achieved is acceptable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12802,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastroenterologia y hepatologia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"502223\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastroenterologia y hepatologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gastrohep.2024.502223\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterologia y hepatologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gastrohep.2024.502223","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的在一家开展胶囊内镜检查数量多、经验丰富的三级甲等医院中,寻找进行胶囊内镜检查时容易优化的参数:回顾性观察研究,包括2017年至2022年间进行的1325例胶囊内镜检查。按适应症、申请地点和候诊名单对总体诊断率、有效诊断率以及完整检查率和清洁度进行了分析:总诊断率为 70.99%,有效诊断率为 72.7%。根据适应症的不同,诊断率在 60.2% 至 77.9% 之间,根据申请中心的不同,诊断率在 64.7% 至 74.3% 之间。平均候诊时间为 101.15 天,候诊时间越长,结果越差。共有 77.8% 的检查是完整的。年龄大于 70 岁的患者完成率较低(P=0.001),胃排空时间大于 60 分钟的患者完成率也较低(P=0.000)。共有 77.3% 的患者胃镜检查干净,其中 16.9% 的患者发现了不妨碍诊断的残渣,5.8% 的患者发现了妨碍诊断的残渣。清洁度与年龄之间存在关系,但不显著:我们中心的 CE 诊断率与之前报道的结果一致。结论:我们中心的 CE 诊断率与之前报道的结果一致。等待名单也会影响诊断率。年龄大于 70 岁和胃排空时间大于 60 分钟时,完成率较低。达到的清洁度是可以接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Search for small-bowel capsule diagnostic yield optimization conducted through observational analysis.

Objectives: To search for parameters susceptible to optimization when performing capsule endoscopy (CE) in a third level hospital with high volume and experience in this test.

Patients and methods: Retrospective observational study, including 1325 CEs performed between 2017 and 2022. Overall diagnostic yield, effective diagnostic yield, by indication, place of request and waiting list, as well as complete examination rate and cleansing degree were analyzed.

Results: The overall diagnostic yield was 70.99%, while the effective diagnostic yield was 72.7%. Diagnostic yields varied between 60.2% and 77.9% depending on the indication and between 64.7% and 74.3% depending on the requesting center. The mean waiting list was 101.15 days, with a tendency to worse results when the waiting list was longer. A total of 77.8% of the examinations were complete. Completion rates were lower in patients >70 years of age (p=0.001), as well as in those with gastric transit >60minutes (p=0.000). A total of 77.3% were clean, with debris that did not impede diagnosis being found in 16.9% and debris that did impede diagnosis in 5.8%. There was a relationship, although not significant, between cleansing degree and age.

Conclusions: The diagnostic yields of CE in our center are in line with those previously reported. Differences were found according to the place of request. Waiting list could also influence diagnostic yield. Completion rates are lower in >70 years of age and when gastric transit is >60minutes. Cleansing degree achieved is acceptable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gastroenterologia y hepatologia
Gastroenterologia y hepatologia GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
10.50%
发文量
147
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Gastroenterology and Hepatology is the first journal to cover the latest advances in pathology of the gastrointestinal tract, liver, pancreas, and bile ducts, making it an indispensable tool for gastroenterologists, hepatologists, internists and general practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信