全球和低收入国家对接受和承诺疗法(ACT)的见解:1998年至2023年文献计量学研究

IF 3.4 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Re Gal Lim , Siok Ping Voon , Fatahyah Yahya , Fitri Suraya Mohamad , Aidi Ahmi
{"title":"全球和低收入国家对接受和承诺疗法(ACT)的见解:1998年至2023年文献计量学研究","authors":"Re Gal Lim ,&nbsp;Siok Ping Voon ,&nbsp;Fatahyah Yahya ,&nbsp;Fitri Suraya Mohamad ,&nbsp;Aidi Ahmi","doi":"10.1016/j.jcbs.2024.100796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This bibliometric study examined the current state, publication trends, key authors and counties, inter-country collaboration, and research themes of the Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) publications produced globally and in low-to-middle-income countries (LMIC) from 1998 to 2023. 1458 ACT publications, with 287 (19.68%) publications from LMIC, were extracted from the Scopus database and analyzed using biblioMagika, OpenRefine, VOSviewer, and Biblioshiny. The global publications received 41,357 citations over 25 years, while the LMIC publications received approximately 4% (n = 1,713) of the total citations since its first publication in 2010. Most ACT publications were written in English (92.80%) and focused on the fields of psychology and medicine. Publication output rose over time, yet citation trends varied globally and in LMIC. Michael Twohig was the most prolific author with 71 publications, whereas Steven Hayes was the most highly cited author with 6,115 total citations. The US, UK, Iran, and China were the most productive contributors in the global and LMIC contexts, accounting for 51.9% (n = 757) and 76.3% (n = 219) of total publications, respectively. Additionally, the US was the central hub of international scholarly collaboration while limited inter-country collaboration existed in some parts of Asia and Europe. Co-word and factorial analyses identified thematic clusters, knowledge evolution, and potential research opportunities for ACT scholars.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 100796"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global and LMIC insights into Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT): A bibliometric study from 1998 to 2023\",\"authors\":\"Re Gal Lim ,&nbsp;Siok Ping Voon ,&nbsp;Fatahyah Yahya ,&nbsp;Fitri Suraya Mohamad ,&nbsp;Aidi Ahmi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcbs.2024.100796\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This bibliometric study examined the current state, publication trends, key authors and counties, inter-country collaboration, and research themes of the Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) publications produced globally and in low-to-middle-income countries (LMIC) from 1998 to 2023. 1458 ACT publications, with 287 (19.68%) publications from LMIC, were extracted from the Scopus database and analyzed using biblioMagika, OpenRefine, VOSviewer, and Biblioshiny. The global publications received 41,357 citations over 25 years, while the LMIC publications received approximately 4% (n = 1,713) of the total citations since its first publication in 2010. Most ACT publications were written in English (92.80%) and focused on the fields of psychology and medicine. Publication output rose over time, yet citation trends varied globally and in LMIC. Michael Twohig was the most prolific author with 71 publications, whereas Steven Hayes was the most highly cited author with 6,115 total citations. The US, UK, Iran, and China were the most productive contributors in the global and LMIC contexts, accounting for 51.9% (n = 757) and 76.3% (n = 219) of total publications, respectively. Additionally, the US was the central hub of international scholarly collaboration while limited inter-country collaboration existed in some parts of Asia and Europe. Co-word and factorial analyses identified thematic clusters, knowledge evolution, and potential research opportunities for ACT scholars.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science\",\"volume\":\"33 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100796\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212144724000760\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212144724000760","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项文献计量学研究考察了 1998 年至 2023 年期间全球和中低收入国家(LMIC)的接受与承诺疗法(ACT)出版物的现状、出版趋势、主要作者和国家、国家间合作以及研究主题。从 Scopus 数据库中提取了 1458 篇 ACT 出版物,其中 287 篇(19.68%)来自中低收入国家,并使用 biblioMagika、OpenRefine、VOSviewer 和 Biblioshiny 进行了分析。自 2010 年首次发表以来,全球出版物在 25 年内共获得 41,357 次引用,而低收入、中等收入和中等收入国家的出版物获得的引用次数约占总引用次数的 4%(n = 1,713)。大多数 ACT 出版物是用英语撰写的(92.80%),主要集中在心理学和医学领域。随着时间的推移,ACT 的出版物数量不断增加,但全球和低收入与中等收入国家的引文趋势各不相同。迈克尔-特沃希(Michael Twohig)是发表论文最多的作者,共发表了 71 篇论文,而史蒂文-海斯(Steven Hayes)则是被引用次数最多的作者,共被引用了 6115 次。美国、英国、伊朗和中国是全球和低收入与中等收入国家中发表论文最多的国家,分别占论文总数的51.9%(n = 757)和76.3%(n = 219)。此外,美国是国际学术合作的中心,而亚洲和欧洲的一些地区则存在有限的国家间合作。共词分析和因子分析确定了专题集群、知识演变以及 ACT 学者的潜在研究机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Global and LMIC insights into Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT): A bibliometric study from 1998 to 2023

This bibliometric study examined the current state, publication trends, key authors and counties, inter-country collaboration, and research themes of the Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) publications produced globally and in low-to-middle-income countries (LMIC) from 1998 to 2023. 1458 ACT publications, with 287 (19.68%) publications from LMIC, were extracted from the Scopus database and analyzed using biblioMagika, OpenRefine, VOSviewer, and Biblioshiny. The global publications received 41,357 citations over 25 years, while the LMIC publications received approximately 4% (n = 1,713) of the total citations since its first publication in 2010. Most ACT publications were written in English (92.80%) and focused on the fields of psychology and medicine. Publication output rose over time, yet citation trends varied globally and in LMIC. Michael Twohig was the most prolific author with 71 publications, whereas Steven Hayes was the most highly cited author with 6,115 total citations. The US, UK, Iran, and China were the most productive contributors in the global and LMIC contexts, accounting for 51.9% (n = 757) and 76.3% (n = 219) of total publications, respectively. Additionally, the US was the central hub of international scholarly collaboration while limited inter-country collaboration existed in some parts of Asia and Europe. Co-word and factorial analyses identified thematic clusters, knowledge evolution, and potential research opportunities for ACT scholars.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
18.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science is the official journal of the Association for Contextual Behavioral Science (ACBS). Contextual Behavioral Science is a systematic and pragmatic approach to the understanding of behavior, the solution of human problems, and the promotion of human growth and development. Contextual Behavioral Science uses functional principles and theories to analyze and modify action embedded in its historical and situational context. The goal is to predict and influence behavior, with precision, scope, and depth, across all behavioral domains and all levels of analysis, so as to help create a behavioral science that is more adequate to the challenge of the human condition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信